数据知识产权异议登记程序建构
Construction of the Opposition Registration Procedure for Data Intellectual Property Rights
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.148768, PDF,   
作者: 郭雅欣:南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 数据产权异议程序利害关系人Data Property Rights Opposition Procedures Stakeholders
摘要: 数据知识产权登记制度中的异议程序发挥着维护真正权利人利益的功能,有必要对数据知识产权异议登记程序进行科学规则设计。利害关系人应当作为异议申请的主体;在异议审查标准方面,对异议申请的形式审查不仅能够提高审查效率,促进数据流通,也符合公正的法律价值追求。在对数据产权登记的异议申请的处理上,有必要采取“行政一审、司法二审”的层级审查模式,且应当设定证据答辩规则,促进纠纷的实际解决。
Abstract: The opposition registration system plays many functions, such as safeguarding the interests of real rights holders, and the opposition procedure of data property rights registration also plays an irreplaceable and important role in data property rights registration. In terms of opposition examination standards, the formal examination of opposition applications can improve the efficiency of examination and promote the circulation of data. The interested party should be the subject of the opposition application, and stipulating a shorter opposition period is conducive to the realization of the efficiency value. In the handling of objection applications for data property rights registration, it is necessary to adopt the handling mode of “administrative first instance and judicial second instance”, and evidence defense rules should be set up to promote the actual resolution of disputes.
文章引用:郭雅欣. 数据知识产权异议登记程序建构[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(8): 720-727. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.148768

参考文献

[1] 郭珺, 杜颖. 我国商标异议程序优化的四点考量[J]. 理论探索, 2023(3): 123-128.
[2] 刘点, 肖冬梅. 日本专利异议制度回归缘由及其启示[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 42(3): 45-50.
[3] 王学辉, 主编. 行政诉讼制度比较研究[M]. 北京: 中国检察出版社, 2004: 205.
[4] 斯金锦. 行政诉讼原告资格——“法律上利害关系”要件研究[J]. 公法研究, 2005(2): 164-181
[5] 尹飞, 李倩. 异议登记申请四论——《房屋登记办法》研讨之八[J]. 中国房地产, 2008(11): 16-19.
[6] 陈广辉, 杨云霞. 异议登记不当损害责任裁判路径管窥——张某诉陈某财产损害赔偿纠纷案[J]. 法律适用, 2019(24): 22-30.
[7] 程啸. 论异议登记的法律效力与构成要件[J]. 法学家, 2011(5): 64-77, 177.
[8] 汪乐. 案外人异议之诉中显名股东名下的股权权属审查标准——以隐名股东作为债务人为切入点[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(1): 115-124.
[9] 王莲峰, 胡丹阳. 商标异议制度改革研究——以《商标法修订草案(征求意见稿)》为视角[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2023, 38(5): 1-13.
[10] 董慧娟, 贺朗. 新“商标法”背景下恶意注册之类型化及规制——以商标审查程序为重点[J]. 电子知识产权, 2020(6): 48-59.
[11] 姚鹤徽. 英美法商标侵权判定之混淆标准的演化与启示[J]. 北方法学, 2017, 11(6): 13-27.
[12] 刘春田. 知识产权法[M]. 北京: 北京高等教育出版社, 2015: 302.