基于CiteSpace的CNKI客家文化研究动态分析(2020~2025):热点、趋势与前沿
A Dynamic Analysis of Hakka Culture Research on CNKI (2020~2025) Based on CiteSpace: Hotspots, Trends, and Frontiers
摘要: 本文基于CNKI数据库收录的2020至2025年6月客家文化研究文献,运用CiteSpace的可视化分析并绘制相关知识图谱,系统梳理该领域的研究热点、趋势与前沿方向。研究发现:基于乡村振兴战略与数字技术发展的背景,客家文化研究呈现从传统理论阐释向实践应用转型的特征,研究主题由早期的“文化保护”(2020~2022)逐步转向“活化利用”(2023~2025),“数字人文”“文旅融合”等新兴概念的涌现,形成学科交叉创新态势。通过知识图谱分析显示:研究主体呈现“核心–边缘”分布,钟俊昆等学者构成核心研究集群,但整体合作密度仅0.0028,反映学术共同体尚待完善;机构合作形成以赣南师范大学和江西理工大学为双核的协同网络,2025年新兴机构的跨区域连接显现协同创新趋势。关键词共现与聚类分析显示,“文化传承”“数字人文”“乡村振兴”等主题成为新兴热点,而“产品设计”“客家舞蹈”等应用领域的研究显著增长。研究揭示三大前沿方向:(1) 数字技术赋能下的文化传承机制;(2) 跨境客家比较研究的理论突破空间;(3) “文化空间生产”作为学术–政策衔接的新枢纽。在“文化–技术–政策”三维框架下,突破单一学科视角,将文化本体、技术手段和政策导向(如乡村振兴)有机结合,同时警惕技术异化与政策短视,回归“以文化为本”的核心逻辑,为客家文化的创新性发展提供理论支撑。
Abstract: Based on literature on Hakka culture research from 2020 to June 2025 included in the CNKI database, this study employs CiteSpace for visual analysis and mapping of knowledge graphs to systematically examine the research hotspots, trends, and frontier directions in this field. The findings reveal that, against the backdrop of rural revitalization strategies and digital technology development, Hakka culture research is shifting from traditional theoretical interpretation to practical application. Research themes have gradually transitioned from early “cultural preservation” (2020~2022) to “activation and utilization” (2023~2025). Emerging concepts such as “digital humanities” and “cultural-tourism integration” reflect an interdisciplinary innovation trend. Knowledge graph analysis indicates that research entities exhibit a “core-periphery” distribution, with scholars like Zhong Junkun forming core research clusters. However, the overall collaboration density is only 0.0028, indicating that the academic community remains underdeveloped. Institutional collaboration has formed a synergistic network with Gannan Normal University and Jiangxi University of Science and Technology as dual cores. By 2025, cross-regional connections among emerging institutions reveal a trend toward collaborative innovation. Keyword co-occurrence and cluster analysis show that themes such as “cultural inheritance”, “digital humanities”, and “rural revitalization” have become emerging hotspots, while applied fields like “product design” and “Hakka dance” have experienced significant growth. The study identifies three major frontier directions: (1) mechanisms of cultural inheritance empowered by digital technology; (2) theoretical breakthroughs in cross-border Hakka comparative studies; and (3) “cultural space production” as a new nexus linking academia and policy. Within a three-dimensional framework of “culture-technology-policy”, this research advocates transcending single-disciplinary perspectives by integrating cultural ontology, technological means, and policy guidance (e.g., rural revitalization), while remaining vigilant against technological alienation and policy short-sightedness. Ultimately, it calls for a return to the core logic of “culture-centricity” to provide theoretical support for the innovative development of Hakka culture.
文章引用:赵冰, 徐佳慧. 基于CiteSpace的CNKI客家文化研究动态分析(2020~2025):热点、趋势与前沿[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(9): 105-113. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.149783

参考文献

[1] 周颜玲. 我国主流意识形态建设视域下传承弘扬中华优秀传统文化研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2019.
[2] 张俊竹, 刘格拉. 挖掘客家文化内涵铸牢中华民族共同体意识[J]. 国际公关, 2025(6): 15-17.
[3] 段晓卿. 2001-2020年CNKI非遗研究文献计量分析[J]. 文化遗产, 2021(4): 28-36.
[4] 单宇, 范武邱. 国内法律翻译研究图谱分析(1992-2016)——基于中国知网702篇研究文献的考量[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018(4): 85-93.
[5] 曹小琴, 陈嘉鸿, 许芳婷. 基于CiteSpace的中国客家文化领域知识图谱研究[J]. 湖南包装, 2021, 36(2): 48-53.
[6] 陈晨, 黄滢. 基于CiteSpace的国内非物质文化遗产研究知识图谱分析[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41(14): 228-234.
[7] 陈悦. 引文空间分析原理与应用: CiteSpace实用指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 3-10.
[8] 魏嘉星, 朱强. 文化生态保护区建设的路径探索与思考——以赣南客家文化生态保护区为例[J]. 赣南师范大学学报, 2024, 45(2): 49-54.
[9] 张海静, 李铭. 洛带客家传统装饰雕塑的数字化传播路径研究[J]. 丝网印刷, 2025(2): 133-135.
[10] 吴岚, 杨卿艺. 赣南客家旅游服饰的创新设计与市场应用探索[J]. 西部皮革, 2024, 46(17): 104-106.
[11] 吴海燕. 客家文化符号与创意产业的发展研究[J]. 丝网印刷, 2025(7): 91-93.
[12] 明心武, 肖静, 刘海锋. 客家文化国际传播的策略探析[J]. 传媒论坛, 2022, 5(23): 86-88.