我国船舶碰撞致油污损害责任制度研究
Research on China’s Liability Regime for Oil Pollution Damage Caused by Ship Collisions
摘要: 船舶碰撞致油污损害责任制度存在归责原则错位、基金功能异化及法律适用冲突等问题。现行立法强制将责任绑定于漏油船舶,剥夺受害方向非漏油过错方索赔的权利,违背过错责任原则,导致司法裁判尺度混乱。油污基金被迫承担本应由碰撞过错方分担的巨额赔偿,赔偿范围限于直接损失,排除生态修复等关键项目,限额设置严重脱离实际。国内法与国际公约的适用混乱加剧赔偿悬殊,责任主体僵化限定于船舶所有人,忽视实际控制人的责任。针对这些问题,本文建议构建油污严格责任与碰撞过错责任并行的双层归责体系,赋予受害方选择权;完善基金补充赔偿定位,扩展生态损害赔付范围并提高限额;厘清国际公约适用边界,统一裁判标准;明确光租人等实际控制主体的法律责任,建立覆盖生态修复全周期的赔偿机制。
Abstract: The current liability regime for oil pollution damage caused by ship collisions suffers from misalignment in liability principles, functional distortion of compensation funds, and conflicts in legal application. Existing legislation compulsorily assigns liability solely to the oil-spilling vessel, thereby depriving victims of the right to claim compensation from non-spilling but at-fault parties. This approach contravenes the fault liability principle and leads to inconsistent judicial rulings. Consequently, oil pollution compensation funds are forced to bear substantial liabilities that should rightfully be shared by collision-fault parties. Moreover, the compensation scope is limited to direct losses, excluding critical items such as ecological restoration, while compensation caps are severely detached from practical needs. Chaotic application of domestic laws and international conventions exacerbates disparities in compensation. Liability subjects remain rigidly confined to vessel owners, overlooking the responsibilities of actual controllers. To address these issues, this paper proposes establishing a dual-layer liability system combining strict liability for oil pollution and fault liability for collisions, granting victims the right to choose between claims; refining the supplementary role of compensation funds, expanding coverage for ecological damage, and raising compensation limits; clarifying the boundaries of international convention application to unify adjudication standards; and defining the legal liability of actual controllers, e.g., bareboat charterers, while establishing a comprehensive compensation mechanism covering the entire ecological restoration cycle.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
余晓汉. 船舶碰撞漏油事故中非漏油船舶的所有人过错归责相关问题辨析——“达飞佛罗里达”轮油污案再审判决内外的思考[J]. 国际法研究, 2023(2): 58-77.
|
|
[2]
|
帅月新, 施依柠. 船舶碰撞导致油污损害之民事赔偿责任分析研究[J]. 中国海事, 2017(6): 39-41.
|
|
[3]
|
欧阳振远. 审理油污案件的法律问题分析及解决[J]. 中国海商法年刊, 2010, 21(4): 40-46.
|
|
[4]
|
沙琳琳. 船舶互有过失碰撞造成油污损害时非漏油方的赔偿原则[J]. 中国海事, 2005(4): 55-57.
|
|
[5]
|
徐国平. 论《民法典》背景下的船舶油污侵权第三人责任立法[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2023, 7(1): 31-50.
|
|
[6]
|
杨成. 《海商法》修订下关于船舶油污损害赔偿制度的研究[J]. 中国海事, 2022(9): 64-68.
|
|
[7]
|
司玉琢. 国际海事立法趋势及对策研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2002: 189.
|
|
[8]
|
谷德近. 美国海洋溢油事故的赔偿范围[J]. 中国审判, 2012(2): 32-33.
|
|
[9]
|
韩立新, 司玉琢. 船舶碰撞造成油污损害民事赔偿责任的承担[J]. 中国海商法年刊, 2003, 14(1): 215-226.
|
|
[10]
|
廖兵兵. 论生态文明视域下我国海洋生态环境损害赔偿制度的完善[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海财经大学, 2023.
|