基于复杂网络方法的中国金融市场联动分析
Analysis of Interconnectedness in China’s Financial Markets Based on the Complex Network Approach
DOI: 10.12677/sa.2025.149256, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨采钰:江西理工大学软件工程学院,江西 南昌;蔡序军*, 张 帆:江西理工大学基础课教学部,江西 南昌
关键词: 跨市场联动图注意力网络系统性风险Cross-Market Interconnectedness Graph Attention Network Systemic Risk
摘要: 本文基于2017~2025年中国股票、外汇、债券、货币、黄金及期货市场高频数据,设计动态波动识别调整时间窗口,结合线性格兰杰因果检验与Hiemstra-Jones非线性检验构建因果关系网络,并运用核回归与VAR脉冲响应函数量化传染强度。引入图注意力网络模型,通过余弦退火学习率调度和混合损失函数实现风险传染路径的动态拓扑建模。实证发现:中国金融市场风险传导呈现显著非对称性,外汇市场为核心枢纽,尤其美元兑在岸人民币汇率与美元兑离岸人民币汇率具有显著双向联动关系;股票与期货市场自解释性较高。但股票市场仍受外汇、债券及期货市场外溢冲击;货币市场作为共同影响因素广泛关联各子市场,债券市场对外汇冲击敏感,黄金市场则承受多市场联合冲击。
Abstract: Based on high-frequency data from China’s stock, foreign exchange, bond, money, gold, and futures markets spanning 2017~2025, this paper designs a dynamically adjusted time window driven by volatility identification. It constructs a causal relationship network by integrating the linear Granger causality test and the Hiemstra-Jones nonlinear test, and employs kernel regression and the VAR impulse response function to quantify contagion intensity. Additionally, the Graph Attention Network (GAT) model is introduced, and dynamic topological modeling of risk contagion paths is achieved through cosine annealing learning rate scheduling and a hybrid loss function. Empirical results reveal that risk transmission in China’s financial markets exhibits significant asymmetry: the foreign exchange market acts as a core hub, with particularly prominent two-way interconnectedness between the USD/onshore RMB exchange rate and the USD/offshore RMB exchange rate. The stock and futures markets demonstrate high self-explanatory power, yet the stock market remains susceptible to spillover shocks from the foreign exchange, bond, and futures markets. As a common influencing factor, the money market maintains extensive connections with various sub-markets; the bond market is sensitive to foreign exchange shocks, while the gold market endures joint shocks from multiple markets.
文章引用:杨采钰, 蔡序军, 张帆. 基于复杂网络方法的中国金融市场联动分析[J]. 统计学与应用, 2025, 14(9): 54-69. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2025.149256

参考文献

[1] 方茜. 基于智能计算的短期汇率与黄金价格联动关系研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海财经大学, 2023.
[2] 靳雨佳. 金融市场的联动效应与风险溢出研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022.
[3] 汪哲宇. 不确定性视角下的金融市场溢出效应分析与策略应对[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2022.
[4] 何枫, 郝晶, 谭德凯, 等. 中国金融市场联动特征与系统性风险识别[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(2): 289-305.
[5] 陈志刚. 金融市场联动与系统性风险[J]. 中国金融, 2018(3): 50-52.
[6] 阮珊妮. 中国金融子市场风险联动关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东财经大学, 2020.
[7] 宫晓莉, 熊熊. 波动溢出网络视角的金融风险传染研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020(5): 39-58.
[8] 何宸浩. 基于时空图神经网络模拟动量溢出效应的股票涨跌预测研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2022.
[9] Silvapulle, P. and Choi, J. (1999) Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Stock Price-Volume Relation: Korean Evidence. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 39, 59-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 吴小卫. 大湾区建设背景下广东区域城镇化对制度转型的影响——基于VAR模型的脉冲响应函数分析[J]. 中国集体经济, 2024(11): 58-61.
[11] Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A.W. and Pelizzon, L. (2012) Econometric Measures of Connectedness and Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sectors. Journal of Financial Economics, 104, 535-559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015) Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks. American Economic Review, 105, 564-608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef