人机协同与循证决策融合的《决策理论与方法》课程教学改革研究
Research on the Teaching Reform of the “Decision Theory and Methods” Course Based on Integrating Human-Machine Collaboration with Evidence-Based Decision Making
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2025.1591724, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 赵 娜*:山东工商学院管理科学与工程学院,山东 烟台;刘丰军:滨州医学院卫生管理学院,山东 烟台
关键词: 决策理论人机协同循证决策课程教改Decision-Making Theory Human-Machine Collaboration Evidence-Based Decision-Making Curriculum Reform
摘要: 本研究聚焦于《决策理论与方法》课程教学中存在的“经验依赖、数据缺位、评价失衡”等决策困境,提出融合人机协同与循证决策理念的教学改革路径。基于“数据启发”范式,构建了教师认知系统与机器智能系统协同运行的循证教学决策模型,设计了覆盖教学计划、课堂互动与学习评价三阶段的“三阶循证”教学模式,实现从经验导向向证据支撑的教学决策转型。教学实践表明,该模式能够有效提升学生的决策认知能力、科研创新能力与反思能力,强化了课程的实践导向与方法论价值。研究实现了决策科学与教学实践、人工智能与教育智慧、数据证据与教育人文的三重融合,为研究生课程教学改革与高层次人才培养提供了新思路与实践范式。
Abstract: This study addresses critical challenges in the teaching of the “Decision Theory and Methods” course, including excessive reliance on teachers’ experience, lack of data-informed instructional decisions, and evaluation systems biased toward knowledge transmission. Drawing on the paradigm of data-informed decision-making, the research integrates human-machine collaboration and evidence-based practices to develop a dual-system instructional decision model combining machine intelligence with teacher cognition. A three-phase evidence-based instructional model—covering planning, in-class interaction, and evaluation—is designed to support a transition from experience-driven to evidence-supported teaching decisions. Empirical implementation demonstrates that the model enhances students’ decision-making cognition, research innovation, and reflective thinking, while reinforcing the course’s methodological and practical orientation. The study achieves a threefold integration of decision science and instructional practice, artificial intelligence and educator insight, and data evidence and educational values. It offers a novel approach for graduate-level curriculum reform and high-level talent cultivation in the context of intelligent education.
文章引用:赵娜, 刘丰军. 人机协同与循证决策融合的《决策理论与方法》课程教学改革研究[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(9): 681-688. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.1591724

参考文献

[1] 丁奕然, 吕立杰. 论教法定势的二重实践样态及其固化突破策略[J]. 教育学报, 2019, 15(3): 40-47.
[2] 张乐乐, 顾小清. 多模态数据支持的课堂教学行为分析模型与实践框架[J]. 开放教育研究, 2022, 28(6): 101-110.
[3] 王长林, 林万成, 韩军涛. 专业思维能力导向下新文科教学模式创新设计研究[J]. 中国大学教学, 2025(7): 91-96.
[4] 王陆, 彭玏, 马如霞. 大数据循证视角下高质量课堂教学的数据特征[J]. 电化教育研究, 2024, 45(3): 10-17.
[5] 张瑞, 谢燕萍. 数字化赋能课堂教学循证评价的价值表征、逻辑框架与实践进路[J]. 现代教育管理, 2025(4): 79-89.
[6] Kurilovas, E. (2020) On Data-Driven Decision-Making for Quality Education. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, Article ID: 105774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 胡钦太, 凌小兰, 梁心贤. 人工智能时代教育的内涵阐释、关键特征与应变之道[J]. 开放教育研究, 2025, 31(4): 12-20, 73.