教师课堂流畅性对小学生学习判断和测试成绩的影响
The Influence of Teachers’ Lecture Fluency on Pupils’ Judgments of Learning and Test Scores
摘要: 课堂流畅性对小学生学习判断具有重要影响。本研究以小学五、六年级学生为被试,考察教师课堂流畅性对小学生元认知监测的影响。被试观看一个6分钟左右的教学视频,视频中的教学可能是流畅的,也可能是不流畅的。学习完成后,由被试预测在10分钟以后能回忆出视频中多少信息,并进行教师评价、学生自评和记忆测试。结果发现:课堂流畅性对小学生的元认知监测及实际学习效果没有显著影响,小学生对视频内容的兴趣及上课意愿也没有增加。但是,流畅的教师在教师评价问题上的得分显著高于不流畅的教师,如课堂的组织、整体教学效果等方面。这表明流畅的教学可能仍会以间接的方式促进学习,而不仅仅通过测试成绩表现出来。
Abstract: Lecture fluency plays an important role in pupils’ judgment of learning. In this study, the fifth and sixth grade primary school students were chosen as subjects to explore the impact of teachers’ lecture fluency on metacognitive monitoring. Participants watched a six-minute lecture video, which was either fluent or not. Immediately after the video, participants were asked to predict how much information they could recall from the video after ten minutes. Then participants completed instructor evaluations, self-assessment and a memory test. The results showed that lecture fluency did not significantly affect the metacognitive monitoring and actual learning. It also did not increase pupils’ interest in the material and willingness to attend class. However, the fluent instructor was rated significantly higher than the disfluent instructor on instructor evaluation questions, such as the preparedness and effectiveness. This shows that the fluent teaching might benefit learning in indirect ways, rather than just through test scores.
文章引用:杜嘉鑫, 万博温. 教师课堂流畅性对小学生学习判断和测试成绩的影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(9): 667-677. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.149851

参考文献

[1] Alter, A.L. and Oppenheimer, D.M. (2009) Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Oppenheimer, D.M. (2008) The Secret Life of Fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Rhodes, M.G. and Castel, A.D. (2008) Memory Predictions Are Influenced by Perceptual Information: Evidence for Metacognitive Illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615-625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 周永兰. 教师讲课流畅性对学生元认知监测和控制的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2017.
[5] Fiechter, J.L., Fealing, C., Gerrard, R. and Kornell, N. (2018) Audiovisual Quality Impacts Assessments of Job Candidates in Video Interviews: Evidence for an AV Quality Bias. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3, Article No. 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Reber, R. and Schwarz, N. (1999) Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Dohle, S. and Montoya, A.K. (2017) The Dark Side of Fluency: Fluent Names Increase Drug Dosing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23, 231-239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Carpenter, S.K., Wilford, M.M., Kornell, N. and Mullaney, K.M. (2013) Appearances Can Be Deceiving: Instructor Fluency Increases Perceptions of Learning without Increasing Actual Learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1350-1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Carpenter, S.K., Northern, P.E., Tauber, S.U. and Toftness, A.R. (2020) Effects of Lecture Fluency and Instructor Experience on Students’ Judgments of Learning, Test Scores, and Evaluations of Instructors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26, 26-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Toftness, A.R., Carpenter, S.K., Geller, J., Lauber, S., Johnson, M. and Armstrong, P.I. (2017) Instructor Fluency Leads to Higher Confidence in Learning, but Not Better Learning. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Motz, B.A., de Leeuw, J.R., Carvalho, P.F., Liang, K.L. and Goldstone, R.L. (2017) A Dissociation between Engagement and Learning: Enthusiastic Instructions Fail to Reliably Improve Performance on a Memory Task. PLOS ONE, 12, e0181775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Carpenter, S.K., Mickes, L., Rahman, S. and Fernandez, C. (2016) The Effect of Instructor Fluency on Students’ Perceptions of Instructors, Confidence in Learning, and Actual Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 161-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 李景杰. 元认知10-15岁少年儿童记忆监控能力的实验研究[J]. 心理学报, 1989, 21(1): 88-96.
[14] 林崇德, 沃建中. 7~11岁儿童自我监控能力的发展及对认知操作的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(4): 1-7.
[15] 刘童. 国内关于不同研究对象学习判断的研究综述[J]. 太原城市职业技术学院学报, 2016(10): 164-166.
[16] 贾宁, 白学军, 彭建国. 小学高年级学生学习判断的发展[J]. 心理科学, 2011, 34(2): 402-406.
[17] Flavell, J.H. (1979) Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. and Buchner, A. (2007) G*power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Koriat, A. (2008) Easy Comes, Easy Goes? The Link between Learning and Remembering and Its Exploitation in Metacognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 416-428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Neath, I. (1996) How to Improve Your Teaching Evaluations without Improving Your Teaching. Psychological Reports, 78, 1363-1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Naftulin, D.H., Ware, J.E. and Donnelly, F.A. (1973) The Doctor Fox Lecture: A Paradigm of Educational Seduction. Academic Medicine, 48, 630-635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Ware, J.E. and Williams, R.G. (1975) The Dr. Fox Effect: A Study of Lecture Effectiveness and Ratings of Instruction. Journal of Medical Education, 50, 149-156.
[23] Williams, R.G. and Ware, J.E. (1976) Validity of Student Ratings of Instruction under Different Incentive Conditions: A Further Study of the Dr. Fox Effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 48-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Marsh, H.W., Fleiner, H. and Thomas, C.S. (1975) Validity and Usefulness of Student Evaluations of Instructional Quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 833-839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Galbraith, C.S., Merrill, G.B. and Kline, D.M. (2012) Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Valid for Measuring Student Learning Outcomes in Business Related Classes? A Neural Network and Bayesian Analyses. Research in Higher Education, 53, 353-374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Yunker, P.J. and Yunker, J.A. (2003) Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Valid? Evidence from an Analytical Business Core Course. Journal of Education for Business, 78, 313-317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef