养老机构服务质量危机及对策研究
Research on the Service Quality Crisis and Countermeasures in Elderly Care Institutions
摘要: 本研究针对中国养老机构面临的服务质量危机展开系统性分析。在人口老龄化加剧与家庭养老功能弱化的背景下,养老机构呈现“高端过剩、普惠短缺”的结构性失衡,同时暴露养老机构存在基础服务质量低下、设施安全隐患、护工情感劳动异化、监管体系滞后等核心问题。基于公共产品理论、情感劳动理论与资源依赖理论,研究揭示危机的深层成因:政府与市场责任边界模糊导致补贴不足与监管失效;护工群体因情绪耗竭与职业歧视陷入服务异化;机构对外部资源的过度依赖引发服务标准波动。为破解危机,论文提出三维对策:政策层面构建“需求–成本–绩效”精准补贴模型,推行长护险试点,建立智慧监管平台;管理层面设计“一人一案”个性化照护方案,量化情感劳动价值,实施透明化运营;行业层面深化医养结合资源整合,搭建“金字塔式”人才晋升体系。研究旨在通过多元协同治理推动养老行业从“生存型”向“质量型”转型,保障老年人权益并缓解社会养老压力。
Abstract: This study conducts a systematic analysis of the service quality crisis faced by elderly care institutions in China. Against the backdrop of an intensifying aging population and the weakening of family support functions, elderly care institutions exhibit a structural imbalance of “excess at the high end and shortage at the inclusive level”, while also revealing core issues such as low basic service quality, potential safety hazards in facilities, alienation of emotional labor among caregivers, and lagging regulatory systems. Based on public goods theory, emotional labor theory, and resource dependence theory, the study uncovers the underlying causes of the crisis: the blurring of responsibility boundaries between the government and the market leads to insufficient subsidies and ineffective regulation; the caregiver group falls into service alienation due to emotional exhaustion and occupational discrimination; and institutions’ excessive dependence on external resources triggers fluctuations in service standards. To address the crisis, the paper proposes a three-dimensional approach: at the policy level, constructing a “demand-cost-performance” precision subsidy model, piloting long-term care insurance, and establishing a smart regulatory platform; at the management level, designing personalized care plans for each individual, quantifying the value of emotional labor, and implementing transparent operations; and at the industry level, deepening the integration of medical and elderly care resources and building a “pyramid-style” talent promotion system. The study aims to promote the transformation of the elderly care industry from a “survival-oriented” to a “quality-oriented” model through multi-dimensional collaborative governance, safeguarding the rights and interests of the elderly and alleviating social pressure on elderly care.
文章引用:吴伊蓁. 养老机构服务质量危机及对策研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(9): 687-696. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.149853

参考文献

[1] 中国政府网. 中共中央 国务院印发《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》[EB/OL]. 2016-10-25.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm, 2023-05-12.
[2] 中国政府网. 健康中国行动(2019-2030年) [EB/OL]. 2019-07-15.
https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm, 2023-05-12.
[3] 中国政府网. 关于进一步推进医养结合发展的指导意见[EB/OL]. 2022-07-18.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-07/22/content_5702161.htm, 2023-05-13.
[4] 中国政府网. 国务院关于印发“十四五”国家老龄事业发展和养老服务体系规划的通知[EB/OL]. 2022-02-21.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-02/21/content_5674844.htm, 2023-05-13.
[5] 中国政府网. 中共中央 国务院关于加强新时代老龄工作的意见[EB/OL]. 2021-11-24.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-11/24/content_5653181.htm, 2023-05-13.
[6] 赵娜, 方卫华. 供给侧改革背景下城市机构养老服务评价及优化——基于服务质量差距模型的视角[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 44(6): 37-42.
[7] 张红凤, 张栋, 卜范富. 养老服务机构服务质量影响因素及其地区差异——基于山东省十七地市的实证分析[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2018, 34(2): 16-25.
[8] 张浩成, 方纪元, 沈阳, 居晨浩, 王杉杉, 郭清. 养老机构医养结合服务质量评价指标体系的构建——基于SPO模型[J]. 卫生软科学, 2020, 34(9): 23-27.
[9] 杨倩文, 杨硕, 王家合. 政府购买机构养老服务绩效评价指标体系构建与实证应用[J]. 社会保障研究, 2021(5): 60-71.
[10] 马跃如, 陈强. 政府行为下养老机构竞争策略研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2021, 26(1): 52-60.
[11] 陈平, 陈若思. 日本居家养老服务模式建设经验及启示[J]. 社会政策研究, 2023(3): 50-63.
[12] 冯小溪, 任素娟. 我国医养结合健康服务体系现状、困境及优化策略研究[J]. 未来与发展, 2023, 47(5): 83-88.
[13] 宁玉叶, 蒋文慧. 养老机构失能老人生活质量调查——以H市为例[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2023, 41(13): 97-100.
[14] 王丹. 积极面对老龄化视角下机构养老发展的困境及对策——以贵阳市X区为例[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2022(23): 70-72.
[15] 谈在祥, 丁甜甜. 乡村振兴背景下农村医养结合养老中存在的问题与对策[J]. 卫生软科学, 2020, 34(3): 19-23.
[16] 日本内阁府2020年版《高齢社会白書》(全体版) [EB/OL].
https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2020/html/zenbun/index.html, 2025-08-18.
[17] Allcock, N., McGarry, J. and Elkan, R. (2002) Management of Pain in Older People within the Nursing Home: A Preliminary Study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 10, 464-471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Eskildsen, M. and Price, T. (2009) Nursing Home Care in the Usa. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 9, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Vänje, A. and Forssberg, K.S. (2021) Being There No Matter What: Working in Publicly Provided Homecare Services. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 11, 43-62.
[20] Gonzalez, L. (2020) Will For-Profits Keep up the Pace in the United States? The Future of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly and Implications for Other Programs Serving Medically Vulnerable Populations. International Journal of Health Services, 51, 195-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Okma, K. and Gusmano, M.K. (2019) Aging, Pensions and Long-Term Care: What, Why, Who, How? Comment on “Financing Long-Term Care: Lessons from Japan”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 9, 218-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Gronroos, C. (1982) An Applied Service Marketing Theory. International Service Quality Association.
[23] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988) SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
[24] 张燕坤. 养老机构标准化与服务质量管理探索[J]. 中国标准化, 2021(20): 47-51.
[25] 保罗·A·萨缪尔森, 威廉·D·诺德豪斯. 经济学[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2004.
[26] 李晓凯. 现代性情境下的个体情感——兼论《心灵的整饰: 人类情感的商业化》[J]. 兰州文理学院学报: 社会科学版, 2021, 37(5): 112-117.
[27] 马迎贤. 资源依赖理论的发展和贡献评析[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2005(1): 116-119+130.