输尿管软镜手术清石效率及相关影响因素分析
Analysis of the Efficiency of Flexible Ureteroscopic Surgery and Related Influencing Factors
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1592642, PDF,   
作者: 杜齐志*, 缪忠清:暨南大学第二临床医学院深圳市人民医院泌尿外科,广东 深圳;林泽裕:中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院深汕中心医院,广东 广州;肖克峰, 江洪涛#:暨南大学第二临床医学院深圳市人民医院泌尿外科,广东 深圳;深圳市人民医院深圳市泌尿外科微创工程技术研究开发中心,广东 深圳
关键词: 输尿管软镜肾结石结石体积清石效率 Flexible Ureteroscopy Kidney Stones Stone Volume Stone Removal Efficiency
摘要: 目的:研究单次输尿管软镜碎石取石术治疗肾结石的清石效率及相关影响因素。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年8月在深圳市人民医院接受单次输尿管软镜碎石取石术,术后影像学检查无残留结石的100例患者的临床资料。使用MIMICS (Materialise’s interactive medical image control system)软件对术前结石CT影像进行3D重建并计算结石体积负荷,结合手术时间得出单位时间内结石清除体积作为清石效率(mm3/min),并对结石体积、年龄、性别、体质指数(Body Mass Index BMI)、结石左右侧、结石部位、结石数量、结石平均CT值、结石成分等可能的影响因素进行分析。100例患者中,男性61例,女性39例;年龄(49.36 ± 12.92)岁;结石位于左侧55例,右侧45例;BMI (24.37 ± 3.04) kg/m2;结石平均CT值(858.49 ± 244.07) HU;全下盏结石29例,非全下盏结石71例;结石主要成分为草酸钙结石72例,非草酸钙结石19例,数据缺失9例;单个结石77例,结石数量 ≥ 2个23例;结石体积中位值529.03 (256.79, 1115.87) mm3 (表1)。结果:100例患者手术均顺利完成,清石效率中位值9.46 (4.70, 19.01) mm3/min。单因素分析结果,结石体积负荷与清石效率呈正相关(P < 0.05);全下盏结石与非全下盏结石的清石效率中位值分别为5.18 (4.09, 11.96) mm3/min和12.90 (5.38, 21.23) mm3/min,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);结石数量为单个和≥2个的清石效率中位值分别为8.35 (4.09, 16.71) mm3/min与13.85 (8.53, 23.00) mm3/min,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05,表2)。多因素分析结果,体积是清石效率的独立影响因素(P < 0.05,表3)。结论:MIMICS软件结合CT影像对结石进行3D成像并精确测量体积,有助于计算单位时间的清石体积,为评估可能的手术时长提供依据;结石体积、数量、部位是清石效率的影响因素。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the stone removal efficiency and related influencing factors of single flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in the treatment of kidney stones. Methods: The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent a single flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy at Shenzhen People’s Hospital from January 2021 to August 2022 and were found to have no residual stones by imaging after surgery were retrospectively analyzed. MIMICS (Materialise’s interactive medical image control system) software was used to reconstruct the preoperative stone CT images and calculate the stone volume load, and the stone removal volume per unit time was obtained as the stone removal efficiency (mm3/min) in combination with the operation time. The possible influencing factors such as stone volume, age, gender, BMI, stone location (left and right), whether it is a total lower calyx calculus, the number of stones, the average CT value of stones, and the components of stones were analyzed. Among the 100 patients, 61 were males and 39 were females, age (49.36 ± 12.92) years; There were 55 cases on the left side and 45 cases on the right side of the stone. BMI (24.37 ± 3.04) kg/m2; The mean CT value of stones was (858.49 ± 244.07) HU. There were 29 cases of total lower calyx calculus and 71 cases of non-whole lower calyx calculus. There were 72 cases of calcium oxalate stones and 19 cases of non-calcium oxalate stones, and 9 cases were missing data. There were 77 cases of single stones, and the number of stones ≥ 2 were 23 cases. The median stone volume was 529.03 (256.79, 1115.87) mm3 (Table 1). Results: All 100 patients successfully completed the operation, and the median stone removal efficiency was 9.46 (4.70, 19.01) mm3/min. The results of univariate analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between stone volume load and stone removal efficiency (P < 0.05), and the median stone removal efficiency of total and non-whole lower calyx calculus was 5.18 (4.09, 11.96) mm3/min and 12.90 (5.38, 21.23) mm3/min, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The median efficiency of stone removal for the number of single stones and ≥2 stones was 8.35 (4.09, 16.71) mm3/min and 13.85 (8.53, 23.00) mm3/min, respectively, with statistical significance (P < 0.05, Table 2). The results of multivariate analysis suggested that volume was an independent factor of stone clearing efficiency. Conclusion: MIMICS software combined with CT images can perform 3D imaging of stones and accurately measure the volume, which is helpful to calculate the volume of stone clearing per unit time, and provides a basis for evaluating the stone removal time. The volume, number and location of stones are the influencing factors of stone removal efficiency.
文章引用:杜齐志, 林泽裕, 缪忠清, 肖克峰, 江洪涛. 输尿管软镜手术清石效率及相关影响因素分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(9): 1436-1442. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1592642

参考文献

[1] 曾国华, 麦赞林, 夏术阶, 等. 中国成年人群尿石症患病率横断面调查[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(7): 528-532.
[2] Zewu, Z., Cui, Y., Feng, Z., Yang, L. and Chen, H. (2019) Comparison of Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Treating Intermediate-Size Renal Stones (2-3cm): A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. International braz j urol, 45, 10-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 范伟洪, 薛晓荣, 陈自立, 等. 肾结石应用输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗效果对比及并发症分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2019, 17(27): 52-54.
[4] 徐鑫, 蒋召强, 刁统祥, 等. 经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜碎石术治疗肾结石的Meta分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 32(5): 365-369.
[5] 丁强, 谢文华, 何屹. 40-80Hz钬激光微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜手术治疗肾结石患者的疗效比较[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 29(1): 65-68
[6] 闫娟, 符华敏, 蓝俏俏, 等. 输尿管软镜碎石术后患者发生尿路感染的影响因素[J]. 中国民康医学, 2024, 36(1): 18-20, 24.
[7] 赵长永. 输尿管软镜术后尿源性脓毒血症的治疗及危险因素分析[J]. 遵义医科大学学报, 2022, 45(4): 518-521.
[8] Wilhelm, K., Miernik, A., Hein, S., Schlager, D., Adams, F., Benndorf, M., et al. (2018) Validating Automated Kidney Stone Volumetry in CT and Mathematical Correlation with Estimated Stone Volume Based on Diameter. Journal of Endourology, 32, 659-664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Wang, J., Huang, Z., Wang, F., Yu, X. and Li, D. (2019) Materialise’s Interactive Medical Image Control System (MIMICS) Is Feasible for Volumetric Measurement of Urinary Calculus. Urolithiasis, 48, 443-446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 周乐, 汪波, 孟令超. 一次性电子输尿管软镜联合末端可弯负压软镜鞘治疗马蹄肾肾结石的疗效分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2025, 40(4): 318-321.
[11] 伦晓璐, 王永传, 周海军, 等. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗2-4cm肾结石临床疗效观察[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 9(4): 245-249.
[12] 洪嘉宝, 杨晓华, 舒渊源, 等. 输尿管软镜碎石在治疗老年肾结石的临床疗效分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2024, 29(2): 333-335.
[13] 周洋, 秦松林, 刘婷, 等. 不同方式治疗2-4cm鹿角型肾结石的临床疗效[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(8): 44-48.
[14] 伦晓璐, 王永传, 任安吉, 等. 输尿管软镜术在拟从事特殊职业人群无症状肾结石中的应用[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 27(4): 335-337, 351.
[15] Breda, A., Ogunyemi, O., Leppert, J.T. and Schulam, P.G. (2009) Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for Multiple Unilateral Intrarenal Stones. European Urology, 55, 1190-1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 何星成, 柯昌兴. 输尿管软镜在特殊人群肾结石治疗中的应用进展[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 25(2): 186-189.
[17] Giusti, G., Proietti, S., Villa, L., Cloutier, J., Rosso, M., Gadda, G.M., et al. (2016) Current Standard Technique for Modern Flexible Ureteroscopy: Tips and Tricks. European Urology, 70, 188-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Karagöz, M.A., Erihan, I.B., Doluoğlu, Ö.G., et al. (2020) Efficacy and Safety of fURS in Stones Larger than 20 mm: Is It Still the Threshold? Central European Journal of Urology, 73, 49-54.
[19] Huang, J., Xie, J., Huang, X., Yuan, Q., Jiang, H. and Xiao, K. (2020) Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for Renal Stones 2 Cm or Greater: A Single Institutional Experience. Medicine, 99, e22704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]