使用与满足理论视角下微博SVIP用户行为及营销研究
Research on Weibo SVIP User Behavior and Marketing from the Perspective of Usage and Satisfaction Theory
摘要: 本研究基于使用与满足理论与传播隐私管理理论,通过半结构化访谈法对16位微博SVIP用户进行深入分析,系统探讨其付费动机、行为策略及平台功能对隐私观念的影响。研究发现,用户付费行为呈现三类典型画像:实用导向型用户视SVIP为提升内容运营与数据分析效率的“生产力工具”;身份表达型用户将其作为获取社群认同与情感满足的“社交货币”;隐私焦虑型用户则出于防御动机,通过消费赎回个人隐私控制权,反映出深刻的“隐私悖论”。研究进一步指出,“查看访客”功能引发显著隐私边界湍流,使用户行为从自由探索转向策略性博弈。基于此,本文提出应依据用户画像实施差异化营销沟通,并通过“隐私选择权让渡”“信息模糊化”等产品创新重构SVIP的隐私伦理价值,在提升商业效能的同时重建用户信任,为社交媒体付费功能的可持续发展提供理论启示与实践路径。
Abstract: This study is based on the Use and Gratification Theory (U&G) and the Communication Privacy Management Theory (CPM). Through semi-structured interviews, 16 Weibo SVIP users were analyzed in depth to systematically explore the impact of their payment motivations, behavioral strategies, and platform functions on privacy concepts. Research has found that there are three typical profiles of user payment behavior: utility oriented users view SVIP as a “productivity tool” to improve content operation and data analysis efficiency; Identity expressive users use it as a “social currency” to gain community recognition and emotional satisfaction; Privacy anxious users, driven by defensive motives, redeem their personal privacy control through consumption, reflecting a profound “privacy paradox”. The study further suggests that the “view visitors” feature triggers significant privacy boundary turbulence, shifting user behavior from free exploration to strategic gaming. Based on this, this article proposes that differentiated marketing communication should be implemented based on user profiles, and the privacy ethical value of SVIP should be reconstructed through product innovations such as “invisible access” and “information blurring”. This will not only enhance business efficiency but also rebuild user trust, providing theoretical inspiration and practical paths for the sustainable development of social media payment functions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中国互联网络信息中心. 第53次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R/OL]. 2024-03-22. https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2024/0322/c88-10964.html, 2024-03-30.
|
|
[2]
|
Atz, E. and Blumler, J.G. (1975) The Uses of Mass Communications. Sage Publications Inc.
|
|
[3]
|
王茜. 社交化、认同与在场感: 运动健身类APP用户的使用动机与行为研究[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2018, 40(12): 149-156.
|
|
[4]
|
Yang, H. and Lin, C. (2014) Why Do People Stick to Facebook Web Site? A Value Theory-Based View. Information Technology & People, 27, 21-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Ruggiero, T.E. (2000) Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Whiting, A. and Williams, D. (2013) Why People Use Social Media: A Uses and Gratifications Approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16, 362-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Pai, P. and Arnott, D.C. (2013) User Adoption of Social Networking Sites: Eliciting Uses and Gratifications through a Means-End Approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1039-1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
甘春梅. 社交媒体使用动机与功能使用的关系研究: 以微信为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(11): 106-115.
|
|
[9]
|
何迎朝, 陈红花. 微博使用动机与行为特征研究综述[J]. 商业时代, 2014(5): 68-70.
|
|
[10]
|
Petronio, S. (1991) Communication Boundary Management: A Theoretical Model of Managing Disclosure of Private Information between Marital Couples. Communication Theory, 1, 311-335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
林进奎. 营销创新与教育营销[J]. 东岳论丛, 2004(3): 189-191.
|
|
[12]
|
雷婧. 数字内容营销视角下消费者与营销实体互动过程研究——基于家电制造业的多案例研究[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 55(2): 154-166.
|
|
[13]
|
熊瑛. 电商平台游戏化营销对消费者持续购买意愿的影响研究——基于使用和满足理论的视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(20): 71-74.
|
|
[14]
|
李飘飘. 社交媒体传播隐私管理的理论研究述评[J]. 东南传播, 2019(11): 108-111.
|
|
[15]
|
刘海, 卢慧, 阮金花, 等. 基于“用户画像”挖掘的精准营销细分模型研究[J]. 丝绸, 2015, 52(12): 37-42, 47.
|