肾盂结石患者泌尿软镜应用与住院时间的相关性研究
A Study on the Correlation between the Application of Urological Flexible Endoscopy and Hospital Stay in Patients with Renal Pelvis Stones
DOI: 10.12677/ns.2025.1410253, PDF,   
作者: 王然然:珠海市中西医结合医院手术室,广东 珠海
关键词: 肾盂结石输尿管软镜住院时间快速康复DRGRenal Pelvis Stones Flexible Ureteroscope Length of Stay Quick Recovery DRG
摘要: 目的:探讨肾盂结石患者行逆行输尿管软镜碎石术(fURS)后住院时间(LOS) > 48 h的独立危险因素,为快速康复外科(ERAS)路径优化及DRG支付下的日间化管理提供循证截点。方法:回顾性纳入2023年1月~2025年4月珠海市中西医结合医院90例肾盂结石且行fURS患者,按LOS分为≤48 h组与>48 h组各45例。比较两组围手术期指标,采用多因素Logistic回归分析LOS延长的独立影响因素。结果:90例平均LOS (49.33 ± 16.28) h,50%患者 > 48 h。结石最大径、术前尿培养阳性、手术时间及术后6 h CRP进入最终模型:结石最大径每增加1 mm,LOS > 48h风险升高16% (OR = 1.16);尿培养阳性使风险增加5.1倍(OR = 5.10);手术时间每延长1 min,风险增加4% (OR = 1.04);术后6 h CRP每升高1 mg/L,风险增加13% (OR = 1.13)。模型C-index = 0.86,Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.60。结论:结石负荷、术前菌尿、手术效率及早期炎症反应是肾盂结石fURS术后LOS延长的四大可干预因素;基于上述指标构建的预测模型可为日间病例筛选与DRG成本控制提供量化工具。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the independent risk factors of hospitalization time (LOS) > 48 h after retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURS) for patients with renal pelvis stones, and to provide evidence-based cut-off points for path optimization of rapid rehabilitation surgery (ERAS) and daytime management with DRG payment. Methods: From January 2023 to April 2025, 90 patients with pyelolithiasis who underwent fURS in Zhuhai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine were retrospectively included, and were divided into two groups according to LOS: ≤ 48 h group and > 48 h group with 45 cases in each group. The perioperative indexes of the two groups were compared, and the independent influencing factors of LOS prolongation were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression. Results: The average LOS of 90 patients was (49.33 16.28) h, and 50% patients were more than > 48 h hours. The maximum diameter of stone, positive urine culture before operation, operation time and 6 h CRP after operation entered the final model: the risk of LOS > 48 hours increased by 16% for every 1mm increase in the maximum diameter of stone (or = 1.16); Positive urine culture increased the risk by 5.1 times (OR = 5.10). The risk increased by 4% (or = 1.04) for every 1min extension of operation time. Every increase of 1mg/L of 6 h CRP 6 days after operation increased the risk by 13% (OR = 1.13). Model C-index = 0.86, Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.60. Conclusion: Stone load, preoperative bacteriuria, operation efficiency and early inflammatory reaction are the four major intervening factors of LOS prolongation after fURS for renal pelvis stones. The prediction model based on the above indicators can provide quantitative tools for daytime case screening and DRG cost control.
文章引用:王然然. 肾盂结石患者泌尿软镜应用与住院时间的相关性研究[J]. 护理学, 2025, 14(10): 1895-1900. https://doi.org/10.12677/ns.2025.1410253

参考文献

[1] 郭洪, 王东文. 软性膀胱镜及NBI技术在泌尿外科的应用(附光盘) [J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 24(12): 975-978, 994.
[2] 孙一乐. 输尿管软镜技术处理泌尿系结石的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(4): 6192-6196.
[3] 周聪, 王亚洲, 吴青霞, 等. CT影像组学机器学习模型预测逆行输尿管软镜碎石术后泌尿系结石清石率[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2025, 22(1): 52-57.
[4] 龚国毅, 曾健文, 赖香茂, 等. 健侧卧奔跑位联合负压吸引的输尿管软镜技术治疗单侧输尿管上段及肾盂结石的临床效果[J]. 江苏大学学报(医学版), 2025, 35(1): 70-72.
[5] 刘慧荣. 代谢综合征评分与肾结石患者经皮肾镜碎石术术后感染的相关性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湛江: 广东医科大学, 2024.
[6] 王硕, 时新宇, 王晓甫, 等. 术前尿培养阴性患者输尿管软镜碎石术后发热的危险因素分析及预测发热列线图模型的构建[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 45(3): 202-207.
[7] Xiao, J., Chen, H., Ge, J., Kuang, J., Huang, X., Zhai, Q., et al. (2025) Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Two Different Types of Ureteral Access Sheaths in RIRS for the Treatment of 2-4 Cm Renal Stones. World Journal of Urology, 43, Article No. 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 陈文炜, 何彦丰, 卢凯鑫, 等. 预测输尿管软镜碎石术后并发尿源性脓毒症的反向传播神经网络模型构建[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2025, 54(1): 99-107.