马尔可夫切换拓扑下时滞多智能体系统间歇事件触发领导跟随一致性研究
Research on Leader Following Consensus Triggered by Intermittent Events in Time-Delay Multi-Agent Systems under Markov Switching Topology
DOI: 10.12677/dsc.2025.144046, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 陶雪梅, 张海洋*:云南民族大学数学与计算机科学学院,云南 昆明;熊良林:云南开放大学传媒与信息工程学院,云南 昆明
关键词: 间歇事件触发控制采样控制马尔可夫切换过程多智能体系统Intermittent Event-Triggered Control Sampled Control Markov Switching Process Multi-Agent Systems
摘要: 本文研究一类在马尔可夫切换拓扑和间歇通信约束下的时滞多智能体系统的领导跟随一致性问题. 智能体间的通信拓扑建模为马尔可夫切换拓扑, 基于采样控制设计一种基于邻居相对状态信息的非 周期间歇分布式事件触发一致性协议, 有效地排除 Zeno 行为. 智能体只在满足特定触发条件时进 行控制更新和信息传输, 有效地降低通信负担和能量消耗, 同时, 通过动态比例系数法, 充分考虑时 滞因素, 设置最小控制时间和最小休眠时间约束合理的选取控制宽度, 避免控制器频繁切换导致的 系统振荡和设备磨损问题. 然后, 利用李雅普诺夫稳定性理论、Kronecker 技术以及图论等方法, 推导出保证多智能体系统实现领导跟随一致性的充分条件. 最后, 通过数值仿真验证所提控制协议 的有效性和理论结果的正确性.
Abstract: This paper investigates the leader-follower consensus problem for a class of delayed multi-agent systems subject to Markovian switching topologies and intermittent com- munication constraints. The communication topology among the agents is modeled as a Markovian switching topology. Based on sampled control, a non-periodic inter- mittent distributed event-triggered consensus protocol is designed using neighboring relative state information, effectively excluding Zeno behavior. Agents perform con- trol updates and information transmissions only when specific triggering conditions are met, effectively reducing communication burden and energy consumption. Concur- rently, employing a dynamic proportional coefficient method, time-delay factors are fully considered. By setting constraints on minimum control time and minimum sleep- ing time, the control width is reasonably selected, thus avoiding system oscillations and equipment wear caused by frequent controller switching. Subsequently, using methods such as Lyapunov stability theory, Kronecker techniques, and graph theo- ry, sufficient conditions are derived to guarantee the achievement of leader-follower consensus in the multi-agent system. Finally, numerical simulations are performed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed control protocol and the correctness of the theoretical results.
文章引用:陶雪梅, 张海洋, 熊良林. 马尔可夫切换拓扑下时滞多智能体系统间歇事件触发领导跟随一致性研究[J]. 动力系统与控制, 2025, 14(4): 464-483. https://doi.org/10.12677/dsc.2025.144046

参考文献

[1] Shahkar, S. (2025) Cooperative Localization of Multi-Agent Autonomous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) Networks in Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transporta- tion Systems, 6, 49-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Yang, Y., Wang, M., Wang, J., Li, P. and Zhou, M. (2025) Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Integrated Demand Forecasting and Inventory Optimization in Sensor-Enabled Retail Supply Chains. Sensors, 25, 2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Wang, J. (2025) Multi Agent System Based Smart Grid Anomaly Detection Using Blockchain Machine Learning Model in Mobile Edge Computing Network. Computers and Electrical En- gineering, 121, Article 109825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Gao, T., Li, Z. and Zhou, B. (2025) Dual and Reduced-Order Observer Based Attack-Free Pro- tocols for Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Markovian Switching Topologies. Systems & Control Letters, 202, Article 106118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Wang, G., Lyu, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2026) Optimal Distributed Finite-Time Consensus Control of Multi-Agent Systems with Markovian Switching Topologies and Applications to Micro- Grids. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 508, Article 129629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Guo, H., Feng, G. and Bi, C. (2024) Stochastic Distributed Tracking of Heterogeneous Multi- Agent Systems with Markovian Switching Topologies and Infinite Delays. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 35, 324-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Dou, Y., Xing, G., Ma, A. and Zhao, G. (2024) A Review of Event-Triggered Consensus Control in Multi-Agent Systems. Journal of Control and Decision, 12, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Han, F. and Jin, H. (2025) Impulsive Control of Nonlinear Multiagent Systems: A Hybrid Fuzzy Adaptive and Event-Triggered Strategy. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 33, 1889-1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ni, H., Mu, C., Kong, F. and Zhu, S. (2025) Practical Fixed-Time Consensus of Discontinuous Multi-Agent Systems: Adaptive Intermittent Control with Time-Varying Gains Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22, 14657-14668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Ni, J., Song, Y., Huang, X. and Wang, Y. (2025) Leader-Follower Consensus Control with Hier- archical Prescribed Performance for Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems under Reversing Actuator Faults. Automatica, 177, Article 112332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Wang, R., Sun, J., Zhang, J., Ding, X., Wang, G. and Wu, Y. (2025) Bipartite Consensus Con- trol of Multi-Agent Systems with Region-Dependent Intermittent Communication. In: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer Nature Singapore, 179-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Zou, Y. and Tian, E. (2025) Bipartite Consensus Control for Multi-Agent Systems with Inter- mittent Communication: A Data-Driven Method. International Journal of Robust and Non- linear Control, 35, 3460-3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Sun, J., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Sun, H., Liu, L. and Shan, Q. (2025) Adaptive Consensus Control of Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems with Mixed-Delays via Energy-Based Intermittent Communication Scheme. Journal of Nonlinear, Complex and Data Science, 26, 31-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Wang, Y. and Zhu, F. (2025) Distributed Hybrid Dynamic Event-Triggered Consensus Control for Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineer- ing, 22, 10470-10483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Guo, G., Tan, H., Feng, Y. and Wang, Y. (2025) Event-Triggered Super-Twisting Fixed-Time Consensus Control for Networked Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems with Disturbance. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22, 11920-11932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Gao, Y. and Wang, L. (2011) Sampled-data Based Consensus of Continuous-Time Multi-Agent Systems with Time-Varying Topology. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 56, 1226- 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Ding, L. and Guo, G. (2015) Sampled-Data Leader-Following Consensus for Nonlinear Multi- Agent Systems with Markovian Switching Topologies and Communication Delay. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 352, 369-383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Ge, X. and Han, Q. (2017) Consensus of Multiagent Systems Subject to Partially Accessible and Overlapping Markovian Network Topologies. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 47, 1807- 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Ding, L. and Zheng, W.X. (2017) Network-based Practical Consensus of Heterogeneous Non- linear Multiagent Systems. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 47, 1841-1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Seuret, A. and Gouaisbaut, F. (2013) Wirtinger-Based Integral Inequality: Application to Time-Delay Systems. Automatica, 49, 2860-2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Park, P., Ko, J.W. and Jeong, C. (2011) Reciprocally Convex Approach to Stability of Systems with Time-Varying Delays. Automatica, 47, 235-238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Hu, S. and Yue, D. (2012) Event-Triggered Control Design of Linear Networked Systems with Quantizations. ISA Transactions, 51, 153-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef