基于二元干预的安宁疗护对老年癌症晚期患者生活质量及照顾者准备度的影响
Impact of Hospice Care Based on a Dichotomous Intervention Strategy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Cancer Quality of Life and Facilitates Caregiver Readiness
DOI: 10.12677/ns.2025.1411268, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 邱 莲, 谭美珍*, 田康林, 杨川敏:秀山县人民医院肿瘤科,重庆;黄 玲:秀山县人民医院重症医学科,重庆
关键词: 安宁疗护照顾者老年二元干预生活质量Hospice Care Carers Elderly Dyadic Interventions Quality of Life
摘要: 目的:评价基于二元干预策略的安宁疗护在晚期癌症患者生活质量及照顾者准备度中的应用效果,为家庭临终关怀工作提供实践依据。方法:选取2024年1月~2025年3月秀山县人民医院肿瘤科收治的60例老年晚期癌症患者及照顾者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和安宁组各30例。对照组接受癌症常规护理,安宁组加用二元干预策略的安宁疗护。通过应用中文版照护者准备度量表及中文版EORTC QLQ-C15-APL量表,分别在干预前后对两组的影响进行了评估。结果:安宁组在干预4周照顾者准备度总分(Z = −6.115, P < 0.001)及患者生活质量总分(t = −3.85, P < 0.001)均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:在安宁疗护中采用二元干预策略有利于提高患者的生活质量和照顾者的准备度。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of hospice care based on a dichotomous intervention strategy on the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer, facilitate caregiver readiness, and provide a practical basis for home hospice care. Methods: Sixty elderly patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers admitted to the Oncology Department of Xiushan County People’s Hospital from January 2024 to March 2025 were selected as the study subjects and were divided into 30 cases each in the control and hospice groups using a random number table method. The control group received routine cancer care, while the hospice group received hospice care with a dyadic intervention strategy. The effects of the two groups were assessed before and after the intervention using the Chinese version of the Caregiver Preparedness Scale and the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-C15-APL. Results: The total caregiver readiness score (Z = −6.115, P < 0.001) and the total patient quality of life score (t = −3.85, P < 0.001) were higher in the hospice group than in the control group after 4 weeks of intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of dichotomous intervention strategies in hospice care improves patient quality of life and facilitates caregiver readiness.
文章引用:邱莲, 谭美珍, 田康林, 杨川敏, 黄玲. 基于二元干预的安宁疗护对老年癌症晚期患者生活质量及照顾者准备度的影响[J]. 护理学, 2025, 14(11): 1998-2005. https://doi.org/10.12677/ns.2025.1411268

参考文献

[1] 张正, 张莉芳, 刘彦廷, 等. 《2022全球癌症统计报告》解读[J]. 中国医院统计, 2024, 31(5): 393-400.
[2] 王娟, 夏源, 姚玉秀, 等. “生命之树”集体叙事实践在安宁疗护患者照顾者中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理, 2024, 24(6): 840-845.
[3] 喻婷, 周川茹, 王聪, 等. 安宁疗护的概念分析[J]. 护理研究, 2025, 39(2): 177-182.
[4] 鞠美涵, 李婷婷, 史根芽, 等. 照顾者准备度评估工具研究进展[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2023, 38(20): 1842-1847.
[5] Yan, Q., Zhu, C., Li, L., Li, Y., Chen, Y. and Hu, X. (2024) The Effect of Targeted Palliative Care Interventions on Depression, Quality of Life and Caregiver Burden in Informal Caregivers of Advanced Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 160, Article 104895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 温华, 陈长英, 唐涵, 等. 晚期癌症患者家庭照顾者准备度的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(7): 1087-1091.
[7] Chen, D., Liu, Q., Zhang, L. and Qian, H. (2025) Effectiveness of Dyadic Psychoeducational Intervention on Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Nursing, 48, 316-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wang, X., Zang, L., Hui, X., Meng, X., Qiao, S., Fan, L., et al. (2025) Dyadic Interventions for Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 161, Article 104948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 安宁疗护中心基本标准和管理规范(试行) [J]. 中国护理管理, 2017, 17(3): 289-290.
[10] Walsh, C.A., Currin-McCulloch, J., Faris, N.R., Nguyen, T.S.T. and Al Achkar, M. (2024) “Living with Loss”: A Qualitative Exploration of Existential Fears among People with Advanced Lung Cancer in Online Lung Cancer Support Groups. Palliative and Supportive Care, 22, 1811-1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Park, Y.J. and Lee, M.K. (2021) Effects of Nurse-Led Nonpharmacological Pain Interventions for Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 54, 422-433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 许湘华, 谌永毅, 肖亚洲, 等. 安宁疗护家庭会议专家共识[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(13): 1541-1544.
[13] 白云波, 范志刚, 刘瑾. 盐酸羟考酮缓释片治疗原发性肺癌患者放化疗期间神经病理性疼痛的临床观察[J]. 中国医药, 2025, 20(1): 47-52.
[14] Li, M., Zhang, L., Li, N., Luo, X., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2023) Effects of Couple-Based Dyadic Interventions on Breast Cancer Patients and Their Intimate Partners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79, 3192-3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Adegboyega, B., Joseph, A., Alabi, A., Omomila, J., Ngema, L.M., Ainsworth, V., et al. (2023) Patient Reported Outcomes Following Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Patients with Brain Metastases in NSIA-LUTH Cancer Center. BMC Cancer, 23, Article No. 1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] O’Hea, E.L., Creamer, S., Flahive, J.M., Keating, B.A., Crocker, C.R., Williamson, S.R., et al. (2022) Survivorship Care Planning, Quality of Life, and Confidence to Transition to Survivorship: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Women Ending Treatment for Breast Cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 40, 574-594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Koyama, N., Matsumura, C., Tahara, Y., Sako, M., Kurosawa, H., Nomura, T., et al. (2022) Symptom Clusters and Their Influence on Prognosis Using EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL Scores in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 30, 135-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 杜晓霞, 孙媛媛, 鲁德玕, 等. “一核多元”安宁疗护模式对肺癌晚期患者癌因性疲乏、希望水平及抑郁情绪的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(2): 335-339.
[19] 施敏, 蔡余琴, 徐增进. 安宁疗护对癌症生命晚期患者的不适症状及生活质量的影响[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2024, 39(6): 1042-1044.
[20] Miyazaki, K., Suzukamo, Y., Ikenaga, M., Ohsumi, S., Saito, M., Satomi, E., et al. (2025) Interpretation of Clinically Meaningful Change in Cancer Palliative Care Patients’ Quality of Life: Minimally Important Difference for EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 9, Article No. 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Matsumura, C., Koyama, N., Okuno, K., Nakamura, N., Sako, M., Kurosawa, H., et al. (2023) Survival Prediction of Patients Who Were Terminally Ill Using the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL Scores and Laboratory Test Values. Palliative Medicine Reports, 4, 202-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Padhi, S., Meher, P., Pujari, L., Mekap, H.S. and Patro, K.C. (2025) Prospective Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients with Brain Metastasis Receiving Whole Brain Radiotherapy. Indian Journal of Cancer, 61, 812-817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Dionne-Odom, J., Azuero, A., Dosse, C., Bechthold, A., Currie, E., Reed, R., et al. (2022) A Lay Navigator-Led Early Palliative Care Intervention for African American and Rural Family Caregivers of Individuals with Advanced Cancer (Project Cornerstone): A Pilot Randomized Trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 63, 859-860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kristanti, M.S., Hidayati, N.W. and Maryadi, (2023) Comparison of Palliative Care Education for Family Caregivers in High-and-Low-Income Countries: An Integrative Review. Belitung Nursing Journal, 9, 411-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ke, Y., Cheung, Y.B., Bakitas, M., Odom, J.N., Lum, E., Tan, D.S.W., et al. (2024) ENABLE-SG (Educate, Nurture, Advise, before Life Ends for Singapore) as a Proactive Palliative Care Model: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Wait-List Controlled Trial. BMC Palliative Care, 23, Article No. 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Jones, S.M.W., Ton, M., Heffner, J.L., Malen, R.C., Cohen, S.A. and Newcomb, P.A. (2023) Association of Financial Worry with Substance Use, Mental Health, and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 17, 1824-1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]