管理者态度对电商商家促销与定价策略的影响研究
The Impact of Managerial Attitude on E-Commerce Sellers’ Promotion and Pricing Strategies
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14113640, PDF,   
作者: 汪绮敏:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;刘 蒙, 干宏程*:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;上海理工大学超网络研究中心,上海
关键词: 管理者态度乐观主义质量差异促销策略Managerial Attitudes Optimism Quality Differentiation Promotional Strategy
摘要: 在电商平台商家的竞争环境中,管理者的主观态度常影响其对促销效果的评估,从而左右市场策略选择。乐观型管理者往往高估促销带来的边际收益,导致策略偏离理性预期。为此,本文在考虑产品质量差异的双寡头竞争框架下,引入管理者态度差异,分析低质量商家管理者持乐观态度时对市场均衡及利润格局的影响。研究表明,(1) 促销成本在竞争中具有关键约束作用,成本过低时易引发过度促销,而较高的成本水平有助于形成稳定均衡;(2) 管理者的乐观态度会强化促销强度并加剧价格竞争,使市场竞争更加激烈;(3) 该态度差异重塑了利润格局,高质量商家的利润下降,而低质量商家在一定程度上受益。
Abstract: In the competitive environment of e-commerce platform merchants, managers’ subjective attitudes often influence their assessment of promotional effectiveness, thereby shaping market strategy choices. Optimistic managers tend to overestimate the marginal benefits of promotions, leading to strategies deviating from rational expectations. To address this, this paper introduces managerial attitude differences within a duopoly competition framework that accounts for product quality variations. It analyzes the impact of optimistic attitudes among managers of low-quality merchants on market equilibrium and profit distribution. The findings reveal that: (1) Promotion costs exert a critical constraint in competition; excessively low costs may trigger excessive promotions, while higher cost levels contribute to stable equilibrium formation; (2) Managerial optimism intensifies promotion intensity and exacerbates price competition, heightening market rivalry; (3) This attitudinal divergence reshapes the profit distribution, causing profit declines for high-quality merchants while benefiting low-quality merchants to a certain extent.
文章引用:汪绮敏, 刘蒙, 干宏程. 管理者态度对电商商家促销与定价策略的影响研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 1920-1928. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14113640

参考文献

[1] Jiang, B. and Liu, C. (2019) Managerial Optimism in a Competitive Market. Production and Operations Management, 28, 833-846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Liu, Z., Gao, R., Zhou, C. and Ma, N. (2019) Two-Period Pricing and Strategy Choice for a Supply Chain with Dual Uncertain Information under Different Profit Risk Levels. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 173-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 康凯, 高思颖, 张敬. 考虑决策者风险态度的供应链融资与定价策略[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2019, 24(5): 32-42.
[4] 陶毅, 杨锐思, 林强, 等. 考虑竞争与风险规避行为的电商供应链融资与定价决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 190-200.
[5] 尤天慧, 刘春怡, 曹兵兵. 考虑成员风险态度的零售商资金约束闭环供应链定价与回收决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 10-17.
[6] Choi, T.M., Ma, C., Shen, B., et al. (2019) Optimal Pricing in Mass Customization Supply Chains with Risk-Averse Agents and Retail Competition. Omega, 88, 150-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Gupta, V. and Ivanov, D. (2019) Dual Sourcing under Supply Disruption with Risk-Averse Suppliers in the Sharing Economy. International Journal of Production Research, 58, 291-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 姜璇, 贾朕, 吴伶俐. 基于网络平台市场的销售商促销竞争策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(1): 217-227.
[9] 栗跃峰, 潘景铭, 唐小我. 零售商主导型供应链返券促销策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(4): 772-781.
[10] 罗美玲, 李刚, 梁冬寒. 知名品牌制造商与零售商的联合消费者返利促销[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(1): 174-184.
[11] 王聪, 杨德礼. 电商平台折扣券对制造商双渠道策略的影响研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(6): 1525-1535.
[12] 张华, 李莉, 朱星圳, 等. 网络购物平台最优价格促销策略: 价格折扣还是现金券? [J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 130-141.