直播电商模式下的信任转移机制:政策保障、文化距离与消费者经验
Trust Transfer Mechanism in the Live E-Commerce Model: Policy Guarantee, Cultural Distance and Consumer Experience
摘要: 在数字经济和全球化深度融合背景下,跨境电商已成为国际贸易重要增长极,但信任缺失始终是制约其发展的核心瓶颈。本文基于信任理论、交易成本理论与消费者行为理论,从政策保障、文化距离与消费者经验三个维度,系统分析跨境电商信任建立的内在机制。研究表明:政策保障作为“基础框架”,通过正式与非正式政策降低跨境交易风险;文化距离作为“调节变量”,其负面影响可通过本地化运营与政策完善缓解;消费者经验作为“微观载体”,通过初次体验、重复体验与经验传递构建起互动互补的信任生态体系。据此,本文从政府、企业与平台层面提出优化路径,为构建跨境电商信任体系提供理论参考与实践指引。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the deep integration of the digital economy and globalization, cross-border e-commerce has become a significant growth driver in international trade. However, the lack of trust remains a core bottleneck constraining its development. Based on trust theory, transaction cost theory, and consumer behavior theory, this paper systematically analyzes the internal mechanisms of trust building in cross-border e-commerce from three dimensions: institutional guarantees, cultural distance, and consumer experience. The study finds that policy guarantee serve as the “foundational framework,” reducing cross-border transaction risks through formal and informal institutions; cultural distance acts as a “moderating variable,” whose negative impact can be mitigated through localized operations and institutional improvements; and consumer experience functions as a “micro-level carrier,” constructing an interactive and complementary trust ecosystem through initial experiences, repeated experiences, and the transmission of experiences. Accordingly, this paper proposes optimization pathways from the perspectives of governments, enterprises, and platforms, providing theoretical references and practical guidance for building a trust system in cross-border e-commerce.
文章引用:郝茜茜, 丁莹. 直播电商模式下的信任转移机制:政策保障、文化距离与消费者经验[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 2652-2661. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14113731

参考文献

[1] Pavlou, P.A. and Gefen, D. (2004) Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust. Information Systems Research, 15, 37-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 马述忠, 贺歌, 郭继文. 如何缓解跨境交易中的信息不对称?——来自跨境电商质量认证的经验证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(6): 88-110.
[3] 范金城, 王洪梅. 兼顾卖家和买家考虑的电子商务平台信任机制分析——基于风险感知的调节作用[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(22): 124-127.
[4] 张衍斌. 基于区块链的电子商务信息生态系统模型研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2018(6): 33-44.
[5] 陈桦, 高雅璇, 贾庆丹, 等. 社交商务对跨境电商消费者认知决策的作用机理——MOA视角下机会和能力要素的调节作用[J/OL]. 工程管理科技前沿, 1-12.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=BVV9sVd_tjFiyuYridpf5ZDfEdrkJp5Ms8HkZTcGL8S_7uVSvCQOK2rHHhlip5HMWoE1uzIySxhzB64I2Rh9YIvzu8UINBFbDPtdMMqP4r64EX8JvUN7nChh7se5Ork-OMev6fVK1brRIZ71i01MEXjjYWuwKHxD_iMJWfmLST4=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS, 2025-10-14.
[6] 韦永贵, 张艺川. 跨国文化传播对中国出口贸易的影响研究——基于友好城市的研究视角[J]. 南方经济, 2021(11): 97-121.
[7] 常鑫, 司传煜. 跨境电商对贸易距离效应的影响——基于“一带一路”区域的实证[J]. 商业经济研究, 2019(10): 123-126.
[8] 贾庆丹, 徐晓瑜, 孙换. 社交电商对跨境电商消费者感知信任和购买意愿的影响——充分性分析与必要性分析相结合[J]. 中国流通经济, 2025, 39(7): 67-81.
[9] 马述忠, 梁绮慧, 张洪胜. 消费者跨境物流信息偏好及其影响因素研究——基于1372家跨境电商企业出口运单数据的统计分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(6): 49-64+244.
[10] 朱永明, 王兴萌, 张水潮. 跨境电商物流服务质量对消费者重购意愿影响研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020(5): 113-116.
[11] 闫慧丽, 彭正银. 嵌入视角下社交电商平台信任机制研究——基于扎根理论的探索[J]. 科学决策, 2019(3): 47-72.
[12] 刘晓春. 平台信任机制构建中的调控型治理转向——以直播带货与《广告法》适用冲突为视角[J]. 行政法学研究, 2025(2): 65-79.
[13] 张洪胜, 潘钢健. 跨境电子商务与双边贸易成本: 基于跨境电商政策的经验研究[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(9): 141-157.
[14] 张洪胜, 张小龙. 线上评价系统与中国跨境电商出口——来自eBay平台国内外卖家比较的证据[J]. 经济学动态, 2023(4): 95-114.
[15] Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995) An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Zucker, L.G. (1986) Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
[17] Coase, R.H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 386-405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Hofstede, G. (1980) Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9, 42-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Pine, B.J. and Gilmore, J.H. (1998) Welcome to the Experience Economy. Harvard Business Review, 76, 97-105.
[20] Kogut, B. and Singh, H. (1988) The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 411-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef