电商平台经营者大数据杀熟的法律规制研究
Legal Regulation Research on Big Data Price Discrimination by E-Commerce Platform Operators
摘要: 随着大数据技术在电子商务领域的广泛应用,“大数据杀熟”已成为平台经济运行中备受关注的治理难题。该行为不仅侵害消费者权益,更对市场公平与诚信秩序构成系统性威胁。本文在系统梳理相关文献与法律实践的基础上,从法学视角对大数据杀熟的双重属性——价格歧视与价格欺诈——进行辨析,指出其认定困境主要源于技术依赖性、隐蔽性及法律规制难度大。通过分析我国在立法、执法与司法环节面临的现实挑战,并借鉴欧盟、美国、日本等法域在数据治理与算法问责方面的经验,提出应构建以“告知–同意”为基石、以算法透明为核心、以权利救济为保障的多层次规制体系。本研究旨在为遏制大数据杀熟、完善平台经济治理提供理论支撑与制度设计参考。
Abstract: With the extensive application of big data technology in the field of e-commerce, “big data killing the fittest” has become a governance dilemma that has attracted much attention in the operation of platform economy. This behavior not only infringes on consumers’ rights and interests, but also poses a systematic threat to market fairness and integrity. On the basis of a systematic review of relevant literature and legal practice, this article analyzes the dual attributes of big data killing the fittest-price discrimination and price fraud-from legal perspective, and points out that the main difficulties in identifying them stem from technical dependency, concealment, and the difficulty of legal regulation. By analyzing the realistic challenges faced by our in legislation, law enforcement and judicature, and drawing on the experience of the EU, the United States, Japan and other legal domains in data governance and algorithm accountability, this proposes that we should build a multi-level regulatory system with “inform-consent” as the cornerstone, algorithm transparency as the core, and rights relief as the guarantee. The purpose of this study is to provide theoretical support and institutional design reference for curbing big data killing the fittest and improving the governance of platform economy.
文章引用:顾光熙. 电商平台经营者大数据杀熟的法律规制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 2799-2804. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14113749

参考文献

[1] 刘佳明. 大数据“杀熟”的定性及其法律规制[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 21(1): 56-61+68.
[2] 周元, 钱龙. “大数据杀熟”的成因体系、现实困境和治理路径探讨[J]. 河南牧业经济学院学报, 2022, 35(6): 61-69.
[3] 廖建凯. “大数据杀熟”法律规制的困境与出路——从消费者的权利保护到经营者算法权力治理[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2020, 22(1): 70-82.
[4] 胡元聪, 冯一帆. 大数据杀熟中消费者公平交易权保护探究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 51(1): 161-176.
[5] 展锦涛. 电商平台“杀熟”行为与消费者的应对策略探析——基于价格歧视的视角[J]. 中国商论, 2025, 34(2): 160-163.
[6] 丁凯明. 强化对“大数据杀熟”的法律规制——以消费者权益保护法实施条例的出台为例[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2025(1): 107-109.
[7] 范雪飞, 田翔宇. 平台大数据“杀熟”的反垄断规制困境与路径优化[J]. 竞争政策研究, 2024(1): 61-72.
[8] 李国昊, 梁永滔, 苏佳璐. 数据确权背景下电商平台大数据“杀熟”治理分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(11): 227-232.
[9] 李长安, 孙雨意, 韩威鹏. 数字经济时代算法歧视问题研究[J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报, 2024, 38(4): 58-66.