社交平台“弱关系交往”的信任研究——以小红书平台为例
Research on Trust in “Weak-Tie Interaction” on Social Platforms —Taking Xiaohongshu Platform as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14124186, PDF,   
作者: 霍赛歌:南京邮电大学数字媒体与设计艺术学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 强弱连接网络信任社交平台Strong and Weak Connections Network Trust Social Platforms
摘要: 在生活分享类社交平台蓬勃发展的当下,以小红书为代表的平台构建起从社交互动到消费决策的完整生态链,社交成为其实现商业价值的立身之本,其中“弱关系交往”更是常见的交流场景。基于此,本文从强弱连接的关系视角出发,运用访谈法探究“弱关系交往”过程中信任的演变机制及社交平台中信任的媒介化表现形式,旨在为社交平台的长期发展提供借鉴。研究发现,弱关系社交是当代年轻人的低频刚需,信任是决定交往过程中关系强弱程度的关键因素;同时归纳出信任的三种媒介化表现,即非刚需信任、事件性信任、经验性信任。由此得出结论:明晰弱关系交往中的信任机制与表现形式,有助于社交平台优化社交功能,维系用户关系,实现平台商业价值与社交价值的平衡发展。
Abstract: In the current era when life-sharing social platforms are booming, platforms represented by Xiaohongshu have built a complete ecosystem from social interaction to consumption decision-making. Social connection serves as the cornerstone for realizing commercial value on these platforms, with “weak-tie interactions” being a common communication scenario. Based on this, from the perspective of strong and weak ties, this study employs in-depth interviews to explore the evolution mechanism of trust in the process of “weak-tie interactions” and the mediatized manifestations of trust within social platforms. The research aims to provide insights for the long-term development of social platforms. The findings indicate that weak-tie socialization is a low-frequency yet essential need among contemporary young people, with trust being a critical factor determining the strength of relationships during interactions. Additionally, the study identifies three mediatized manifestations of trust: non-essential trust, event-based trust, and experiential trust. The conclusion drawn is that clarifying the trust mechanisms and their manifestations in weak-tie interactions can help social platforms optimize their social functions, maintain user relationships, and achieve a balanced development of commercial and social value.
文章引用:霍赛歌. 社交平台“弱关系交往”的信任研究——以小红书平台为例[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 2859-2867. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124186

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第56次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[R]. 北京: 中国互联网络信息中心, 2025.
https://cnnic.cn/n4/2025/0721/c88-11328.html, 2025-07-21.
[2] Granovetter, M. (1974) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Harvard University Press.
[3] Bian, Y. (1997) Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62, 366-385.
[4] 段俊吉. “零糖社交”: 当代青年人际关系的新型样态及其逻辑[J]. 中国青年研究, 2025(5): 76-84+75.
[5] 邱泽奇, 乔天宇. 强弱关系, 还是关系人的特征同质性? [J]. 社会学评论, 2018, 6(1): 3-20.
[6] 许德娅, 刘亭亭. 强势弱关系与熟络陌生人: 基于移动应用的社交研究[J]. 新闻大学, 2021(3): 49-61, 119.
[7] Granovetter, M. (1983) The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 刘睿翔. 从“广场”到“近邻”——强关系视角下微信视频号传播策略探析[J]. 视听, 2022(5): 126-128.
[9] 谢英香. “90后”大学生网络社交中信任关系的研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2013.
[10] 谢英香. “90后”大学生网络信任建构过程研究[J]. 当代青年研究, 2014(6): 58-64.
[11] Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999) Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization Science, 20, 791-815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Bian, Y. (2018) The Prevalence and the Increasing Significance of Guanxi. The China Quarterly, 235, 597-621.
[13] 黄光国, 胡先缙, 等. 面子: 中国人的权利游戏[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2004: 7-10.
[14] Luhmann, N. (1979) Trust and Power. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[15] 乔纳森·特纳. 社会学理论的结构(下) [M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2001: 113-114.
[16] 欧文·戈夫曼. 日常生活中的自我呈现[M]. 冯钢, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008: 3.
[17] Whitty, M.T. and Gavin, J. (2001) Age/Sex/Location: Uncovering the Social Cues in the Development of Online Relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 623-630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]