人工智能审判的正当性研究
Research on the Legitimacy of Artificial Intelligence Trial
摘要: 人工智能审判的正当性主要包括审判正当性、推理正当性、程序正当性三个重要部分,是其能否融入到司法审判领域的关键。以司法实践的成果来看,当前的司法人工智能能给司法审判提供极大的便利,所以比起可行性问题,更应当关注司法人工智能参与审判的正当性问题。从当今的时代背景来看,人工智能参与到司法审判中来已经是必然趋势。因此,对人工智能审判的正当性进行研究将会从法理层面为新兴科技在审判实践中的合理运用提供理论依据。
Abstract: The legitimacy of artificial intelligence trials mainly includes three important parts: trial legitimacy, reasoning legitimacy, and procedural legitimacy. These are keys to whether it can be integrated into the judicial trial field. From the perspective of achievements in judicial practice, current judicial AI can provide significant convenience for judicial trials. Therefore, rather than focusing on the issue of feasibility, greater attention should be paid to the legitimacy of AI’s participation in judicial trials. Against the backdrop of the current era, the involvement of AI in judicial trials has become an inevitable trend. Consequently, researching the legitimacy of AI in judicial trials will provide a theoretical basis from the perspective of jurisprudence for the rational application of emerging technologies in trial practice.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
左卫民. 数字司法的中国图景[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2023.
|
|
[2]
|
王禄生. 司法大数据与人工智能技术应用的风险及伦理规制[J]. 法商研究, 2019, 36(2): 101-112.
|
|
[3]
|
贾章范. 司法人工智能的话语冲突、化解路径与规范适用[J]. 科技与法律, 2019(6): 59-67.
|
|
[4]
|
张继成. 价值判断是法律推理的灵魂[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2001(1): 65-69.
|
|
[5]
|
[德]霍恩. 法律科学与法哲学导论[M]. 罗莉, 译. 北京: 北京法律出版社, 2005.
|
|
[6]
|
孙海波. 反思智能化裁判的可能及限度[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2020, 28(5): 80-99.
|
|
[7]
|
刘东亮. 技术性正当程序: 人工智能时代程序法和算法的双重变奏[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(5): 64-79.
|
|
[8]
|
发展负责任的人工智能: 新一代人工智能治理原则发布[J]. 科技与金融, 2019(7): 2-3.
|
|
[9]
|
[德]尤尔根∙哈贝马斯. 在事实与规范之间——关于法律和民主法治国的商谈理论[M]. 童世骏, 译. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 2014.
|
|
[10]
|
(2019) Artificial Intelligence; Researchers from Fujitsu Report New Studies and Findings in the Area of Artificial Intelligence (Demystifying AI: What Digital Transformation Leaders Can Teach You about Realistic Artificial Intelligence). Journal of Robotics & Machine Learning. https://scholar.cnki.net/zn/Detail/index/GARJ2019/SPQDF11FFB42928CE5505F75816154DD2523
|
|
[11]
|
[美]理查德∙A∙波斯纳. 法理学问题[M]. 苏力, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002.
|
|
[12]
|
唐丰鹤. 司法人工智能与人类法官的互补之道——以当事人公正感为中心的思考[J]. 求是学刊, 2023, 50(4): 122-134.
|
|
[13]
|
丁晓东. 人机交互决策下的智慧司法[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(4): 58-68.
|