跨境电商海外仓存储假冒商品的法律责任解构——以销售假冒注册商标的商品罪为核心视角
Deconstruction of Legal Liability for Overseas Warehouses of Cross-Border E-Commerce Storing Counterfeit Goods—From the Core Perspective of the Crime of Selling Goods Bearing Counterfeit Registered Trademarks
摘要: 随着跨境电商出口业务的蓬勃发展,海外仓逐渐成为假冒商品非法流转的关键环节,相关商标侵权案件呈增长态势。本文以我国《刑法》第二百一十四条“销售假冒注册商标的商品罪”为核心,结合跨境电商行业特性与司法实践,界定跨境电商海外仓的法律定位及犯罪构成要素,剖析管辖权跨境衔接、境外证据采信、情节量化认定等法律适用难点,系统解构此类行为的刑事、民事、行政责任,并结合亚马逊海外仓售假典型案例提炼实践启示。最后从立法、司法、行业监管、企业合规四个维度提出完善路径,以期为司法实践提供理论参考,强化跨境电商知识产权保护,推动行业健康有序发展。
Abstract: With the vigorous development of cross-border e-commerce export business, overseas warehouses have gradually become a key link in the illegal circulation of counterfeit goods, and related trademark infringement cases are on the rise. Focusing on Article 214 of China’s Criminal Law, the “Crime of Selling Goods Bearing Counterfeit Registered Trademarks”, this paper combines the characteristics of the cross-border e-commerce industry and judicial practice to define the legal positioning of cross-border e-commerce overseas warehouses and the constituent elements of the crime. It analyzes the difficulties in legal application such as cross-border connection of jurisdiction, admissibility of overseas evidence, and quantitative determination of circumstances, and systematically deconstructs the criminal, civil and administrative liabilities of such acts. Practical insights are extracted from the typical case of counterfeit sales in Amazon’s overseas warehouses. Finally, improvement paths are proposed from four dimensions: legislation, judicature, industry supervision and enterprise compliance, aiming to provide theoretical reference for judicial practice, strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights in cross-border e-commerce, and promote the healthy and orderly development of the industry.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
宋海英, 许琳. 海外仓——电商时代物流业发展的必然趋势[J]. 全国流通经济, 2015(7): 24-25.
|
|
[2]
|
黄祥青. 侵犯知识产权犯罪司法认定若干问题探讨[J]. 法律适用, 2006(7): 41-45.
|
|
[3]
|
梁静. 跨境电商知识产权法律风险及应对研究——基于网络空间的分析[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)社会科学, 2016(11): 183-184.
|
|
[4]
|
刘维. 我国商标侵权的法律构造研究——以混淆可能性为中心[J]. 研究生法学, 2010, 25(5): 64-90.
|
|
[5]
|
唐方成, 仝允桓. 经济全球化背景下的开放式创新与企业的知识产权保护[J]. 中国软科学, 2007(6): 58-62.
|
|
[6]
|
施张凌. 跨境电商经营者的民事责任分析[J]. 商情, 2019(10): 113.
|
|
[7]
|
李阳. 域外刑事证据可采性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2016.
|
|
[8]
|
刘太宗, 刘涛. “两高”《关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》解读[J]. 人民检察, 2025(10): 18-28.
|
|
[9]
|
喻尚. 协同治理视角下加强跨境电商知识产权保护的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海海关学院, 2023.
|
|
[10]
|
熊英. 电子商务平台经营者知识产权保护义务与责任分析——以《电子商务法》规定为限[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2019(4): 10-15.
|
|
[11]
|
雅婷胡. 知识产权保护视域下电子商务平台的侵权责任研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(1): 3863-3869.
|
|
[12]
|
鲍永正. 电子商务知识产权法律制度研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2025.
|
|
[13]
|
那朝英. 大数据时代跨境电子商务中的多元治理主体及其协同治理结构研究[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2021(6): 122-130.
|
|
[14]
|
鲁旭. 外贸B2C海外仓的流程再造效果与市场价值[J]. 对外经贸实务, 2015(11): 63-66.
|
|
[15]
|
魏婷婷. 基于私力执行与智能合约的跨境电商纠纷解决机制构建[J]. 中国流通经济, 2020, 34(12): 92-101.
|
|
[16]
|
刘文娟. 跨境电商面临的“海外仓”税务合规风险及应对策略[J]. 注册税务师, 2025(2): 42-44.
|
|
[17]
|
Leydesdorff, L., Kushnir, D. and Rafols, I. (2012) Interactive Overlay Maps for US Patent (USPTO) Data Based on International Patent Classification (IPC). Scientometrics, 98, 1583-1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|