食管吻合口瘘内引流法提高胸腔内吻合口瘘恢复的评价分析
Evaluation and Analysis of the Improvement of Intrathoracic Anastomotic Fistula Recovery by Internal Drainage of Esophageal Anastomotic Fistula
摘要: 目的:食管吻合口瘘患者行内引流促进胸腔内食管吻合口瘘恢复的疗效评估。方法:回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年12月在安徽医科大学第二附属医院胸外科行食管癌根治术术后出现胸腔内吻合口瘘患者56例,其中行食管吻合口瘘内引流术患者29例,未行特殊治疗措施的吻合口瘘病人27例,对这些患者的术后瘘口愈合时间、发热持续时间、引流管置管时间、出院时间、体重下降情况、病人疼痛时间等进行评估,结果:食管吻合口瘘内引流组相比对照组术后瘘口愈合时间更短[(36.45 ± 9.23) d vs (65.34 ± 17.58) d, P = 0.002],术后引流量更少[(1074 ± 198.43) mL vs (2012 ± 286.67) mL, P = 0.009],引流管置管时间短[(23.73 ± 9.98) d vs (54.13 ± 12.67) d, P = 0.016],发热累计时间短[(7.64 ± 3.83) d vs (15.84 ± 6.24) d, P = 0.021],出院时间短[(38.69 ± 10.19) d vs (67.35 ± 18.07) d, P = 0.004],术后BMI下降程度低[(19.94 ± 1.23) kg/m2 vs (18.36 ± 1.87) kg/m2, P = 0.035],病人疼痛持续时间更短[(16.21 ± 8.45) d vs (22.23 ± 10.18) d, P = 0.033],压疮发生率更低(3.45% vs 25.93%, P = 0.023)。结论:食管吻合口瘘内引流法可以促进食管吻合口瘘的愈合,改善病人术后恢复情况,降低护理负担,值得临床推广。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of internal drainage in promoting the recovery of intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic fistula in patients with esophageal anastomotic fistula. Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients with intrathoracic anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2023 to December 2024. Among them, 29 patients underwent internal drainage of esophageal anastomotic fistula, and 27 patients with anastomotic fistula did not receive special treatment measures. The postoperative fistula healing time, fever duration, drainage tube placement time, discharge time, weight loss, and patient pain duration of these patients were evaluated. Results: The postoperative fistula healing time of the esophageal anastomotic fistula internal drainage group was shorter than that of the control group [(36.45 ± 9.23) d vs (65.34 ± 17.58) d, P = 0.002], the postoperative drainage volume was less [(1074 ± 198.43) mL vs (2012 ± 286.67) mL, P = 0.009], and the drainage tube placement time was shorter [(23.73 ± 9.98) d vs (54.13 ± 12.67) d, P = 0.016]. The cumulative duration of fever was short [(7.64 ± 3.83) d vs (15.84 ± 6.24) d, P = 0.021], and the discharge time was short [(38.69 ± 10.19) d vs (67.35 ± 18.07) d, P = 0.004]. The degree of postoperative BMI decrease was low [(19.94 ± 1.23) kg/m2 vs (18.36 ± 1.87) kg/m2, P = 0.035], and the duration of pain in patients was shorter [(16.21 ± 8.45) d vs (22.23 ± 10.18) d, P = 0.033]. The incidence of pressure ulcers was lower (3.45% vs 25.93%, P = 0.023). Conclusion: The internal drainage method of esophageal anastomotic fistula can promote the healing of esophageal anastomotic fistula, improve the postoperative recovery of patients, reduce the burden of nursing, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
文章引用:尹程程, 翟玲玲, 曹炜. 食管吻合口瘘内引流法提高胸腔内吻合口瘘恢复的评价分析[J]. 护理学, 2026, 15(1): 16-21. https://doi.org/10.12677/ns.2026.151003

参考文献

[1] Jiang, W., Zhang, B., Xu, J., Xue, L. and Wang, L. (2025) Current Status and Perspectives of Esophageal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancer Communications, 45, 281-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Hong, H., He, Y., Li, Y., Shen, Y. and Qu, Y. (2025) Charting the Future of Esophageal Cancer Translation: Insights from Clinical Trial Landscape. International Journal of Surgery, 111, 2731-2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Qi, L., Sun, M., Liu, W., Zhang, X., Yu, Y., Tian, Z., et al. (2024) Global Esophageal Cancer Epidemiology in 2022 and Predictions for 2050: A Comprehensive Analysis and Projections Based on GLOBOCAN Data. Chinese Medical Journal, 137, 3108-3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Diao, X., Guo, C., Jin, Y., Li, B., Gao, X., Du, X., et al. (2025) Cancer Situation in China: An Analysis Based on the Global Epidemiological Data Released in 2024. Cancer Communications, 45, 178-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Qin, J., Feng, B. and Huang, J. (2025) Perioperative Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 392, Article 1554.
[6] Santillan, A.A., Farma, J.M., Meredith, K.L., Shah, N.R. and Kelley, S.T. (2008) Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Cancer. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 6, 879-884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Chen, X., Dang, Y., Zhang, Q., Ma, Y., Yao, L., Wang, H., et al. (2024) MFI-11 in Chinese Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients with Postoperative Adverse Outcomes. BMC Geriatrics, 24, Article No. 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wang, J., Zhao, L., Lin, J., Yu, Y., Tong, T. and Zhao, Y. (2025) Comparison of Mediastinoscopy and Thoracoscope Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and System Review. BMC Cancer, 25, Article No. 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 赵泽玉. 内引流治疗胸内胃食管吻合口瘘的临床疗效观察[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2017.
[10] 周庆峰. 食管癌根治术后食管胃吻合口瘘危险因素分析及治疗[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 昆明医科大学, 2019.
[11] 时鸿娟, 陈真, 谭潇. 食管癌术后并发吻合口瘘的风险因素研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2025, 65(10): 129-133.
[12] 康颖. 食管癌术后吻合口瘘的护理研究进展[J]. 继续医学教育, 2022, 36(4): 165-168.
[13] 樊景春. 食管癌切除胃代食管吻合术术后并发吻合口瘘患者的护理[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊), 2021, 28(6): 151-153.
[14] 费静, 沈黎黎. 食管癌围手术期护理研究进展[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2020, 8(27): 91+99.
[15] Liu, S., Qiao, L., Liu, Y., Liu, H., Li, Y., Sun, J., et al. (2024) Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Mixed Nutrition for Postoperative Esophageal Cancer Patients in China: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 14, Article ID: 1417765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Wei, W., Chen, Z., He, Y., Feng, H., Hou, J., Lin, D., et al. (2015) Long-Term Follow-Up of a Community Assignment, One-Time Endoscopic Screening Study of Esophageal Cancer in China. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33, 1951-1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Tachimori, Y. (1998) Diagnosis and Surgery of Esophageal Cancer. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 28, 57-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 胡银燕, 赵林芳, 贺晓映, 等. 1例食管癌术后并发重度免疫检查点抑制剂相关肺炎及吻合口瘘患者的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(14): 1752-1756.
[19] 丁倩, 何爽, 宁妍妍, 等. 精细化营养支持对食管癌患者术后营养状况、恢复情况及生活质量的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2022, 20(5): 513-516.