我国轻罪犯罪附随后果的适用反思与规范路径研究
Research on the System of Collateral Consequences for Minor Crime: Reflection and Normative Approaches
摘要: 随着我国刑事立法活性化与犯罪结构轻刑化趋势的演进,“轻罪时代”特征日益凸显。轻罪数量增多,轻罪发生率逐年上升,而与之相配套的犯罪附随后果制度却没有作出系统性调适,导致出现刑罚效应过度扩张、前科人员社会复归困难、制度运行失范等问题。当前,附随后果的适用标准模糊、与罪行之间的实质关联性薄弱、以及可能产生的负面连带效应等困境,制约着该制度摆脱重刑时代的桎梏从而走向现代化与法治化。鉴于此,本文在全面梳理实践现状与实践困境的基础上,从限缩适用范围、构建以人身危险性为核心的评估标准、以及探索建立分层式的前科消灭与复权机制三方面,对我国犯罪附随后果的适用机制进行了系统性的完善,以期在社会防卫与人权保障之间实现最大的平衡,促进我国前科附随后果制度能够更好契合现代法治精神。
Abstract: With the trend of active criminal legislation and the mitigation of crime structure in China, the characteristics of the “era of minor crime” are becoming increasingly prominent. The number of minor crime cases is increasing, and the incidence of minor crime is rising year by year, yet the corresponding system of collateral consequences has not been systematically adjusted, leading to issues such as excessive expansion of punitive effects, difficulties in the social reintegration of individuals with criminal records, and irregularities in system operation. Currently, the ambiguous application standards, weak substantive connection between consequences and offenses, and potential negative spillover effects hinder the transformation of this system from a traditional punitive mindset to a modern rule-of-law function. In view of this, this paper, on the basis of a comprehensive review of the current situation and the practice dilemma, has systematically improved the application mechanism of the consequences of crime in China from three aspects: limiting the scope of application, constructing the assessment standard with the core of personal danger, and exploring the establishment of a hierarchical mechanism of the elimination of criminal record and the restoration of rights. The aim is to balance social defense and human rights protection, promoting the alignment of this system with the spirit of the modern rule of law.
文章引用:王艳. 我国轻罪犯罪附随后果的适用反思与规范路径研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(1): 112-119. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.141015

参考文献

[1] 卢建平. 刑事一体与犯罪分层[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2025(3): 38-55.
[2] 龚逸. 轻罪治理视域下犯罪分层的路径探究[J]. 连云港职业技术学院学报, 2023, 36(4): 27-33.
[3] 彭文华. 我国犯罪附随后果制度规范化研究[J]. 法学研究, 2022, 44(6): 171-188.
[4] 李金玲. 防止“隐性处罚”: 轻罪治理中犯罪附随后果制度的优化路径[J]. 北京警察学院学报, 2025(2): 39-48.
[5] 邹子铭. 轻罪扩张背景下的犯罪附随后果研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2023, 44(6): 153-172.
[6] 徐宏, 沈烨娜. 轻罪治理背景下我国犯罪附随后果制度的反思与重构[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(1): 67-79.
[7] 付强, 符洪雪. 优化我国犯罪附随后果制度的几点建议[J]. 人民检察, 2015(20): 76-77.
[8] 劳东燕. 风险社会与功能主义的刑法立法观[J]. 法学评论, 2017, 35(6): 12-27.
[9] 罗翔. 犯罪附随性制裁制度的废除[J]. 政法论坛, 2023, 41(5): 24-35.
[10] 冯迎港. 困局与破局: 我国轻罪犯罪后果适用的优化路径构建[J]. 甘肃理论学刊, 2024(4): 93-102.
[11] 张磊, 王之春. 轻微犯罪前科附随后果的规制路径研究[J]. 公民与法(审判版), 2025(2): 10-18.
[12] 何荣功. 预防刑法的扩张及其限度[J]. 法学研究, 2017, 39(4): 138-154.
[13] 陈俊秀. 我国刑罚附随后果之体系检视与调适路径[J]. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 46(4): 109-120.
[14] 陈修勇. 轻微犯罪非定罪记录的类型化分析与封存路径建构[J]. 现代法学, 2025, 47(5): 131-147.
[15] 姚莉. 我国轻微犯罪记录封存制度构建研究[J]. 法学研究, 2025, 47(5): 134-152.
[16] 李兰英, 张曦. 为“复权”而“赋权”——“刑事被遗忘权”在轻微犯罪记录封存制度中的嵌入及实现[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2025, 65(6): 38-50+237.
[17] 孙锐. 犯罪附随后果规范化研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东政法学院, 2025.