职业打假者适用惩罚性赔偿研究
A Study on Punitive Damages for Professional Counterfeit Detectors
摘要: 《消费者权益保护法》颁布之后出现了“知假买假”这一灰色地带,职业打假人出现在公众视野,其是否具有消费者的身份成为案件争议焦点。消费者的判断标准存在分歧,采取综合标准可以避免随意扩大或者限缩《消费者权益保护法》的适用范围。分类型区分职业打假者是否具有消费者的身份,有利于保护民营经济发展,也有利于打击制假售假行为。
Abstract: Following the enactment of the Consumer Rights Protection Law, the practice of “knowingly purchasing counterfeit goods” emerged as a gray area, bringing professional counterfeit fighters into public discourse. Whether these individuals qualify as consumers has become a central point of legal contention. Divergent criteria for defining consumers exist, and adopting a comprehensive standard helps prevent arbitrary expansion or narrowing of the law’s applicability. Classifying professional counterfeit fighters based on typology to determine their consumer status can contribute to safeguarding the development of the private economy while effectively combating the production and sale of counterfeit goods.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈年冰. 重视惩罚性赔偿制度的激励功能——以《消费者权益保护法》中的惩罚性赔偿制度为例[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 43(2): 69-73.
|
|
[2]
|
李毅君. 消费者权益保护法中惩罚性赔偿条款的适用[J]. 人民司法, 2015(23): 82-86.
|
|
[3]
|
肖嘉楠. 知假买假者有权主张多倍赔偿金[J]. 人法司法, 2023(11): 67-71.
|
|
[4]
|
梁慧星. 消费者权益保护法第49条的解释与适用[N]. 人民法院报, 2001-03-29(3).
|
|
[5]
|
壬子, 何山. “还我一个宁静的公序良俗”——消费者权益保护法有关问题访谈录[J]. 中国律师, 1998(3): 35-37.
|
|
[6]
|
王利明. 消费者的概念及消费者权益保护法的调整范围[J]. 政治与法律, 2002(2): 2-11.
|
|
[7]
|
尚连杰. “知假买假”的效果证成与文本分析[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2015, 18(1): 81-91.
|
|
[8]
|
崔格豪. 食品市场职业打假人权利的法律边界[J]. 食品与机械, 2023, 39(12): 60-64.
|
|
[9]
|
王瑞金. 对职业打假人的两种评价[J]. 中国质量监管, 2024(1): 36-38.
|