改良Hardinge入路半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的短期临床疗效
Short-Term Clinical Efficacy of Modified Hardinge Approach Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly
摘要: 目的:探究改良hardinge入路行髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的短期疗效及安全性能,为临床治疗方案的选定提供实证参考。方法:回顾性分析2023年7月至2025年9月于本院接受改良hardinge入路髋关节置换术的17例老年股骨颈骨折患者临床资料。所有患者术前完成全面检查以评估手术耐受度,术中采用改良hardinge入路实施人工髋关节置换,术后常规开展抗感染、抗凝治疗及康复指导。观察患者手术时长、切口长度、术中出血量、术后24 h引流量、首次下床负重时间、伤后至手术间隔及术后住院天数等围术期指标;采用Harris髋关节功能评分评估术后1个月、3个月的关节功能恢复状况,并记录术后并发症发生情况。结果:17例患者均顺利完成手术,无术中严重并发症。手术时长50~100 min,切口长度8~12 cm,术中出血量50~200 ml,术后24 h引流量20~230 ml,首次下床负重时间2~5 d,伤后至手术间隔2~9 d,术后住院天数7~17 d。术后1个月Harris评分为81~89分,术后3个月升至93~97分,后者较前者显著提高。术后随访3~12个月,未出现深静脉血栓、假体脱位、感染等严重并发症。结论:改良hardinge入路髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折具有手术耗时短、术中出血少、术后恢复快等优势,短期疗效确切且安全性高,值得临床推广。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of modified hardinge approach hip arthroplasty in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, providing evidence-based reference for clinical treatment selection. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 17 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent modified hardinge approach hip arthroplasty in our hospital from July 2023 to September 2025. All patients underwent comprehensive preoperative evaluations to assess surgical tolerance. The modified hardinge approach was employed for total hip arthroplasty (THA) during the procedure, followed by standard postoperative care including anti-infection therapy, anticoagulation, and rehabilitation guidance. Perioperative parameters were monitored, including operative duration, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume within 24 hours postoperatively, first ambulation time, interval from injury to surgery, and postoperative hospitalization duration. Harris Hip Function Score was used to evaluate postoperative joint function recovery at 1 and 3 months, with postoperative complications recorded. Results: All 17 patients underwent successful surgery without intraoperative severe complications. The operative duration ranged from 50 to 100 minutes, with incision lengths of 8~12 cm and intraoperative blood loss of 50~200 mL. Postoperative drainage volume at 24 hours ranged from 20 to 230 mL. The first ambulation time was 2~5 days, the interval from injury to surgery was 2~9 days, and the postoperative hospitalization duration was 7~17 days. The Harris score was 81~89 at 1 month postoperatively and increased to 93~97 at 3 months, with the latter showing a significant improvement. During the 3~12 months follow-up, no severe complications such as deep vein thrombosis, prosthesis dislocation, or infection were observed. Conclusion: The modified hardinge approach for hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures demonstrates advantages including shorter operative time, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and faster postoperative recovery. With confirmed short-term efficacy and high safety, this technique is worthy of clinical promotion.
文章引用:张洋, 朱天信, 张文远, 周铮, 吴吉祥, 朱恒杰. 改良Hardinge入路半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的短期临床疗效[J]. 生物医学, 2026, 16(1): 179-186. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjbm.2026.161019

参考文献

[1] 高悠水. 2021年AAOS《老年髋部骨折的治疗: 基于循证的临床诊疗指南》解读[J]. 中国骨伤, 2023, 36(3): 279-283.
[2] 杜宪辉, 王树相. 老年股骨颈骨折术后并发症及危险因素分析的研究进展[J]. 现代医学与健康研究(电子版), 2025, 9(4): 40-44.
[3] 宋宝东, 浦瑶瑶, 赵洪伟. 老年股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换术不同手术时机对术后髋关节功能及并发症的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2018, 38(14): 3406-3407.
[4] 贾大维. 人工髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2019, 17(23): 29-30.
[5] 宋国瑞, 刘军, 张晨, 等. 加速康复外科理念在老年全髋关节置换术围术期的临床应用研究[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2021, 43(2): 137-140.
[6] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 云南省创伤骨科临床医学中心(解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院). 中国髋关节置换入路选择临床实践指南(2021年版) [J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6): 651-659.
[7] Wayne, N. and Stoewe, R. (2009) Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the Lateral Hardinge Approach to an Anterior Mini-Invasive Approach. Orthopaedics Reviews, 1, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 陈佳, 李西成. 髋部骨折: 争议与挑战[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2017, 3(4): 193-196.
[9] 赵红星, 张超, 陶金刚, 等. 不同入路的髋关节置换术的早期疗效和炎性应激研究[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2023, 40(6): 1171-1174.
[10] 江海亮, 梁健铭, 陈晴, 等. 直接前方入路与后外侧入路髋关节置换术的早期临床疗效比较[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2023, 16(1): 31-36.
[11] 朱林松, 戴俊. 前外侧入路与后外侧入路半髋关节置换术治疗老年移位股骨颈骨折的临床疗效比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(21): 101-104.
[12] 马邹, 张上上, 张鹏, 等. 微创直接前侧入路与后外侧入路髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的效果对比观察[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2022, 43(5): 307-313.
[13] 刘弘扬, 许弘佳, 梁俊生. 微创直接前侧入路半髋关节置换术治疗高龄Evans Ⅰ型股骨转子间骨折患者的早期疗效观察[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2022, 27(12): 817-822.
[14] 黄朝明, 夏绍祥, 裴儒, 等. 改良后外侧入路与传统后外侧入路内固定治疗三踝骨折的疗效对比[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2025, 34(5): 413-416.
[15] 符诗坚, 张涛, 曹博然, 等. 直接前路微创手术在僵直髋全髋关节置换术中短期应用效果观察[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2020, 48(9): 1079-1080.
[16] 袁志, 刘常浩. 髋部骨折治疗进展[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2018, 20(8): 561-565.