《个人信息保护法》框架下我国智能网联汽车的个人信息保护研究
Research on Personal Information Protection in China’s Intelligent Connected Vehicles under the Framework of the Personal Information Protection Law
摘要: 新型汽车的“联网”功能日益普及，在智能网联汽车行业持续扩张、新型智能网联汽车应用和设备层出不穷的今天，妥善收集和处理用户个人隐私信息至关重要。因此，了解驾驶联网汽车及其数据服务所涉及的隐私问题，比了解其他消费品的隐私问题更为紧迫。然而，智能网联汽车应用开发者通常并未充分考虑这些措施，导致不安全的应用被发布。本文对智能网联汽车个人信息领域的安全和隐私问题进行了研究，主要包含三个部分：一是回顾相关学术文献；二是提出当前我国智能网联汽车个人信息保护存在的问题；三是为开发者提出一些建议，以帮助他们创建符合现行安全和隐私法规的智能应用。本文将对现有的安全和隐私标准及认证进行补充，并为应用开发者和研究人员提供一份简明指南。
Abstract: The “connectivity” function of new cars is becoming increasingly widespread. With the continuous expansion of the intelligent connected vehicle industry and the emergence of numerous new intelligent connected vehicle applications and devices, the proper collection and processing of users’ personal privacy information is crucial. Therefore, understanding the privacy issues involved in driving connected cars and their data services is more urgent than understanding the privacy issues of other consumer products. However, intelligent connected vehicle application developers often do not fully consider these measures, leading to the release of insecure applications. This paper studies the security and privacy issues in the field of personal information in intelligent connected vehicles, mainly in three parts: first, a review of relevant academic literature; second, the current problems in the protection of personal information in intelligent connected vehicles in my country; and third, suggestions for developers to help them create intelligent applications that comply with current security and privacy regulations. This paper will supplement existing security and privacy standards and certifications and provide a concise guide for application developers and researchers.
文章引用：黄露茜. 《个人信息保护法》框架下我国智能网联汽车的个人信息保护研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(1): 182-191. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.121024

参考文献

[1] 张玥, 朱庆华. 国外信息隐私研究述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(13): 140-148.
[2] 张大伟, 谢兴政. 隐私顾虑与隐私倦怠的二元互动: 数字原住民隐私保护意向实证研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(7): 101-110.
[3] 贾若男, 王晰巍, 范晓春. 社交网络用户个人信息安全隐私保护行为影响因素研究[J]. 现代情报, 2021, 41(9): 105-114+143.
[4] 曹明增, 张磊, 李晶. 基于位置服务中的位置隐私保护技术综述[J]. 计算机技术与发展, 2024, 34(6): 1-9.
[5] 程啸. 论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(3): 102-122+207-208.
[6] 欧阳洋, 袁勤俭. 电子商务中消费者隐私关注对行为意向的影响研究[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 34(5): 75-80.
[7] 曹达. 我国社交媒体隐私政策文本与个人信息保护水平研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2019.
[8] 李青, 苏明雪, 聂含韵. 教育类App隐私保护评价指标构建和保护现状研究[J]. 中国远程教育, 2022(9): 69-77.
[9] 王娜, 杨宇婷, 张灿灿, 等. 运动健康类App用户隐私政策规避行为形成机理研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2023, 19(12): 1-10.
[10] 刘璐. 电商平台用户隐私保护策略与路径设计研究——基于国内主流电商平台隐私条款的分析[J]. 企业经济, 2025, 44(4): 89-97.
[11] 雷丽彩, 郭芷欣. 基于政府监管的社交媒体用户隐私保护演化博弈分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2024, 20(8): 39-50.
[12] 余成峰. 平台媒介的兴起: 隐私保护的范式与悖论[J]. 东方法学, 2024(5): 74-87.
[13] 李畅畅. APP个人信息保护政策困境与应对路径[J]. 信息安全研究, 2024, 10(2): 177-183.
[14] Schwartz, P.M. and Peifer, K.N. (2017) Transatlantic Data Privacy Law. Georgetown Law Journal, 106, 115-179.
[15] Acquisti, A. and Grossklags, J. (2005) Privacy and Rationality in Individual Decision Making. IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, 3, 26-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Ben-Shahar, O. and Schneider, C.E. (2017) The Failure of Mandated Disclosure. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 4, 146-169.
[17] Cranor, L.F. (2012) Necessary but Not Sufficient: Standardized Mechanisms for Privacy Notice and Choice. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 10, 273.
[18] Solove, D.J. (2012) Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126, 1880-1903.
[19] Tschider, C.A. (2020) Beyond the “Black Box”. Denver Law Review, 98, 683.
[20] Litman-Navarro, K. (2019) We Read 150 Privacy Policies. They Were an Incomprehensible Disaster. The New York Times.
[21] Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R. and Horne, D.A. (2007) The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41, 100-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Auxier, B., Rainie, L., Anderson, M., et al. (2019) Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused and Feeling Lack of Control over Their Personal Information.
[23] Waldman, A.E. (2020) Cognitive Biases, Dark Patterns, and the ‘Privacy Paradox’. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 105-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Chen, L., Huang, Y., Ouyang, S., et al. (2021) The Data Privacy Paradox and Digital Demand. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[25] Jones, M.L. and Kaminski, M.E. (2020) An American’s Guide to the GDPR. General Data Protection Regulation, 98, 93.
[26] Waldman, A.E. (2022) Privacy, Practice, and Performance. California Law Review, 110, 1221.
[27] Waldman, A.E. (2019) Privacy Law’s False Promise. Washington University Law Review, 97, 773.
[28] Schwartz, P.M. (2008) Reviving Telecommunications Surveillance Law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 75, 287-315.
[29] Bradley, C.G. (2022) Privacy Theater in the Bankruptcy Courts. Hastings Law Journal, 74, 607.
[30] Bamberger, K.A. and Mulligan, D.K. (2015) Privacy on the Ground: Driving Corporate Behavior in the United States and Europe. MIT Press.
[31] Waldman, A.E. (2018) Privacy’s Law of Design. University of California, Irvine Law Review, 9, 1239.
[32] Solove, D.J. and Schwartz, P.M. (2021) ALI Data Privacy: Overview and Black Letter Text. University of California, Irvine Law Review, 68, 1252.
[33] Solove, D.J. and Hartzog, W. (2014) The FTC and the New Common Law of Privacy. Columbia Law Review, 114, 583-676.
[34] Cui, S. and Qi, P. (2021) The Legal Construction of Personal Information Protection and Privacy under the Chinese Civil Code. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, Article 105560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐