跨境电商知识产权风险分析与防控体系构建
Risk Analysis and Prevention System Construction for Intellectual Property in Cross-Border E-Commerce
摘要: 随着跨境电商成为我国对外贸易的重要渠道,其在扩展海外市场的同时也面临日益严峻的知识产权纠纷挑战。本研究表明,当前我国跨境电商知识产权纠纷呈现高发态势,主要集中于美、欧等核心市场,涉及专利、商标侵权及恶意诉讼等多重风险。这些风险根源于严苛的平台规则、知识产权的地域性壁垒、企业自身合规意识与能力的系统性缺失,以及由“搭便车”行为与集体行动困境所导致的行业预警与互助机制的缺位。为此,本文在知识产权战略管理与集体行动理论框架下,构建了一个立体防控体系:在企业层面,主张通过加强意识、前瞻布局、做好FTO分析来构建全链条风险防控体系;在行业层面,倡议组建协同防御制度,通过构建行业预警平台、组织联合应诉、设立行业保险等方式,形成集体应对合力。
Abstract: As cross-border e-commerce has become an important channel for China’s foreign trade, it not only expands its market overseas but also faces increasingly severe challenges in intellectual property disputes. This study shows that current intellectual property disputes in China’s cross-border e-commerce are on the rise, mainly concentrated in core markets such as the United States and Europe, involving multiple risks such as patent and trademark infringement and malicious lawsuits. These risks stem from strict platform rules, geographical barriers to intellectual property rights, the systematic lack of enterprises’ compliance awareness and ability, as well as the absence of industry early warning and mutual assistance mechanisms caused by “free-riding” behavior and collective action dilemmas. Therefore, based on the framework of intellectual property strategic management and collective action theory, this paper has constructed a three-dimensional prevention and control system: at the enterprise level, it advocates building a full-chain risk prevention and control system by strengthening awareness, making forward-looking plans, and conducting FTO analysis; at the industry level, it proposes establishing a collaborative defense system, through building an industry early warning platform, organizing joint litigation, and establishing industry insurance, to form collective response strength.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中国知识产权研究会 国家海外知识产权纠纷应对指导中心. 2024年度中国企业海外知识产权纠纷调查[R/OL]. http://files.cnips.org.cn/upload/file/JFDC2025.pdf, 2025-12-08.
|
|
[2]
|
黄栋, 王娟娟. “一带一路”背景下企业创新国际化中的海外知识产权保护[J]. 企业经济, 2023, 42(5): 18-29.
|
|
[3]
|
屈幸. 跨境电商知识产权保护问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林财经大学, 2019.
|
|
[4]
|
关永红. 跨境电商商标侵权风险识别与提升应对能力对策探析[J]. 中华商标, 2025(10): 65-68.
|
|
[5]
|
蔡玉龙. 非专利实施主体恶意诉讼规制问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2018.
|
|
[6]
|
陈喆, 解丽敏. 《中美经贸协议》“通知-删除”规则与中国网络版权立法回应[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2021, 32(3): 105-112.
|
|
[7]
|
暗礁中突围: 跨境企业的知识产权维权困境[EB/OL]. 法治日报·法治周末官网. http://m.legalweekly.cn/fzzg/2025-04/24/content_9172360.html, 2025-12-08.
|
|
[8]
|
Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
曼瑟尔∙奥尔森. 集体行动的逻辑[M]. 陈郁, 郭宇峰, 李崇新, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1995.
|
|
[10]
|
面对美国“337调查”平衡车何以接连胜诉[EB/OL]. 中新网. https://www.chinanews.com.cn/cj/2017/09-04/8321664.shtml, 2025-12-09.
|
|
[11]
|
通力律师, 通力法评. 知产观点|中国企业出海美国的知识产权纠纷及其应对策略简述[EB/OL]. 2025-02-21. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA3ODA5MzI3Mw==&mid=2650293025&idx=1&sn=60f2d5002f5ebc2cbd287cc21b9f147a&chksm=867fb1b582bceb9f08b470bec8fb28500c9a8be91af7a0dd92266d6b7845c0ac9258fb324b68#rd, 2025-12-09.
|
|
[12]
|
金明浩. 中国企业海外知识产权纠纷应对机制分析[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2018(2): 169-177.
|