我国犯罪构成理论的思考
Reflections on the Theory of Criminal Constitutions in China
摘要: 犯罪构成理论,对于刑法学的发展作用及意义是不言而喻的。随着时代的发展,我国犯罪构成四要件理论固有的缺陷逐渐显露,而三阶层理论的引入更是让传统理论迎来真正的挑战,故学界一直存在“移植说”与“肯定说”两种对立观点。本文梳理了犯罪构成理论不同的学术观点、争论分歧,分析了三阶层犯罪构成理论的优越性,表明我们应当正确认识不同理论的优缺点,进行合理的借鉴与移植,努力构建具有中国特色的犯罪构成理论。
Abstract: The theory of criminal composition plays an undeniable role and significance in the development of criminal law. However, with the progress of the times, the inherent flaws of the four-element theory in China gradually emerged, and the introduction of the three-tier theory posed a genuine challenge to the traditional theory. As a result, there have always been two opposing viewpoints in academia: the “transplantation theory” and the “affirmation theory.” This paper reviews the different academic perspectives and disputes on the theory of criminal composition, analyzes the advantages of the three-tier theory of criminal composition, and indicates that we should correctly recognize the strengths and weaknesses of different theories, make reasonable references and transplants, and strive to construct a theory of criminal composition with Chinese characteristics.
文章引用:洪晨溢. 我国犯罪构成理论的思考[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(2): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.122034

参考文献

[1] 高铭暄. 论四要件犯罪构成理论的合理性暨对中国刑法学体系的坚持[J]. 中国法学, 2009(2): 5-11.
[2] 王充. 犯罪构成的争议问题与思考路径[J]. 关东学刊, 2025(1): 5-19.
[3] 于阳. 改造我国四要件的犯罪构成体系——“一机两翼式”犯罪构成体系之提倡[J]. 政法论丛, 2022(4): 106-118.
[4] 姚建龙, 刘兆炀. 否定四要件犯罪构成理论之再反思[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2023, 38(4): 63-80.
[5] 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第六版. 法律出版社, 2021: 130-131.
[6] 陈荣飞. 犯罪构成之属性探究[J]. 湖湘法学评论, 2025, 5(3): 47-66.
[7] 张明楷. 犯罪构成理论的课题[J]. 环球法律评论, 2003(3): 262-274.
[8] 曾粤兴. 犯罪客体的教义学新解[J]. 河南警察学院学报, 2025, 34(5): 61-70.
[9] 赵国强. 高铭暄教授“四要件犯罪构成理论”评述[J]. 北京社会科学, 2024(3): 53-61.
[10] [日]大谷实. 刑法总论[M]. 黎宏, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 71.