青岛地区某医院肿瘤疾病组和非肿瘤疾病组 金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性的比较
Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus Resistance between Tumor Disease Group and Non-Tumor Disease Group in a Hospital in Qingdao
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.162490, PDF,   
作者: 许丹丹:青岛大学青岛医学院,山东 青岛;赵自云*:康复大学青岛中心医院检验科,山东 青岛
关键词: 肿瘤疾病非肿瘤疾病金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性Tumor Diseases Non-Tumor Diseases Staphylococcus aureus Resistance
摘要: 目的:为了给临床有效防治金黄色葡萄球菌感染提供科学的用药依据,本研究针对肿瘤疾病与非肿瘤疾病相关的金黄色葡萄球菌耐药情况,开展了对比分析研究。方法:收集我院2019年1月至2024年12月期间,从各类临床标本中分离获取的非重复金黄色葡萄球菌菌株;整个研究过程执行参照卫生部医政司医院感染监测小组制定的诊断准则,将其划分为肿瘤疾病组与非肿瘤疾病组,对两组的耐药率开展卡方检验,同时针对其耐药特性及成因进行探析。结果:在非肿瘤疾病组的金黄色葡萄球菌中,该菌对万古霉素、克林霉素、利福平在内的6种抗生素的耐药率明显高于肿瘤疾病组;但红霉素的耐药率表现却恰好相反;两组之间青霉素类药物的耐药性无差别。2019年至2024年,两组疾病中金黄色葡萄球菌对红霉素与青霉素整体维持较高的抗药率,克林霉素、四环素和庆大霉素总体呈现下降态势,利福平的抗药率一直维持较低水平,环丙沙星的抗药率则呈现上升趋势,肿瘤疾病组中苯唑西林的抗药率也表现出上升趋势。结论:肿瘤疾病组的金黄色葡萄球菌对克林霉素、利福平、四环素、苯唑西林、庆大霉素及环丙沙星的耐药程度较非肿瘤疾病组感染低,耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌的检出占比也低于非肿瘤疾病组感染,该现象可能与两类患者的免疫情况、抗生素接触经历以及临床治疗策略存在不同有关。医院应建立联合管理机制,积极加强多部门协作,推行临床抗菌药的规范管理及合理使用,降低临床细菌耐药率,遏制多重耐药菌的增长。
Abstract: Objective: To provide a scientific basis for clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections, this study conducted a comparative analysis of S. aureusresistance patterns between tumor-related and non-tumor-related diseases. Methods: Unique S. aureusstrains isolated from various clinical specimens in our hospital between January 2019 and December 2024 were classified into tumor and non-tumor disease groups per the diagnostic criteria established by the Hospital Infection Surveillance Team of the Medical Administration Department, Ministry of Health. Chi-square tests were used to compare resistance rates between groups, and resistance characteristics and underlying causes were explored. Results: In the non-tumor disease group, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) displayed significantly higher resistance rates to six antibiotics, including vancomycin, clindamycin, and rifampicin, compared to the tumor disease group. Conversely, erythromycin resistance showed the opposite pattern. No significant difference in penicillin-class antibiotic resistance was observed between the two groups. From 2019 to 2024, S. aureusin both groups maintained relatively high overall resistance to erythromycin and penicillin-class antibiotics. Resistance to clindamycin, tetracycline, and gentamicin exhibited a downward trend; rifampicin resistance remained consistently low; ciprofloxacin resistance increased over time; and oxacillin resistance in the tumor disease group also showed an upward trend. Conclusion: Staphylococcus aureus in the tumor disease group exhibited lower resistance levels to clindamycin, rifampicin, tetracycline, oxacillin, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin compared to the non-tumor disease group. Additionally, the detection rate of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was lower in the tumor group. This disparity may be attributed to differences in immune status, antibiotic exposure history, and clinical treatment strategies between the two patient populations. Hospitals should establish a joint management mechanism, strengthen multi-departmental collaboration, promote standardized management and rational use of clinical antimicrobials, reduce bacterial resistance rates, and curb the proliferation of multidrug-resistant bacteria.
文章引用:许丹丹, 赵自云. 青岛地区某医院肿瘤疾病组和非肿瘤疾病组 金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性的比较[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(2): 1095-1103. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.162490

参考文献

[1] Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B., Kowalewski, C., Krolak-Ulinska, A. and Marusza, W. (2022) Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23, Article 8088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 牟晓峰, 赵自云, 张磊. 医院和社区获得性金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性比较[J]. 青岛大学医学院学报, 2010, 46(6): 500-501+504.
[3] Hassoun, A., Linden, P.K. and Friedman, B. (2017) Incidence, Prevalence, and Management of MRSA Bacteremia across Patient Populations—A Review of Recent Developments in MRSA Management and Treatment. Critical Care, 21, Article No. 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 全国细菌耐药监测网. 全国细菌耐药监测网2018-2021年中医医院多重耐药菌监测报告[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1148-1158.
[5] 刘晨, 陈崇翔, 赵擎宇. 肿瘤医院感染患者革兰阳性菌分布与耐药性及经验性抗MRSA的研究[J]. 现代临床医学, 2021, 47(3): 185-187+194.
[6] 丁新玲, 李曼. 金黄色葡萄球菌标本分布及耐药情况分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2022, 17(12): 1442-1445.
[7] Marino, A., Maniaci, A., Lentini, M., Ronsivalle, S., Nunnari, G., Cocuzza, S., et al. (2025) The Global Burden of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Epidemiologia, 6, Article 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 张利. 某基层医院临床微生物检验和细菌耐药性的分析[J]. 饮食保健, 2022(5): 41-44.
[9] Sallah, Y.H., Bratti, V.F., Rafinejad-Farahani, B., Jayasekar Zurn, S., Johnson, S., Crestani, A.S., et al. (2025) Antimicrobial Resistance in Patients with Haematological Malignancies: A Scoping Review. The Lancet Oncology, 26, e242-e252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Cojutti, P., Scarparo, C., Sartor, A., Coato, P., Rigoli, R. and Pea, F. (2015) A 5-Year Survey of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from Patients with Bloodstream Infections in Northeast Italy. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 81, 53-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Aklilu, E. and Chia, H.Y. (2020) First Mecc and Meca Positive Livestock-Associated Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (mecC MRSA/LA-MRSA) from Dairy Cattle in Malaysia. Microorganisms, 8, Article 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Duarte, F.C., Danelli, T., Tavares, E.R., Morguette, A.E.B., Kerbauy, G., Grion, C.M.C., et al. (2019) Fatal Sepsis Caused by Meca-Positive Oxacillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: First Report in a Tertiary Hospital of Southern Brazil. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 25, 293-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 阮红日. 金黄色葡萄球菌噬菌体的分离鉴定及其对生物被膜的作用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2021.
[14] Gao, W., Yang, J., Zhang, X., Tian, L., Xu, D., Xu, S., et al. (2024) Omadacycline for Diverse Infections in China: A Real-World Analysis of Efficacy and Safety. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 13, 2509-2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Loganathan, A., Bozdogan, B., Manohar, P. and Nachimuthu, R. (2024) Phage-Antibiotic Combinations in Various Treatment Modalities to Manage MRSA Infections. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, Article ID: 1356179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Behera, M., Singh, P., Verma, A.K., De, S. and Ghorai, S.M. (2025) Activity of GS-Linked Chimeric Endolysin Chapk-Sh3bk against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms: An In-Vitro, Ex-Vivo and In-Vivo Study. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 11, Article No. 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zeden, M.S., Gallagher, L.A., Bueno, E., Nolan, A.C., Ahn, J., Shinde, D., et al. (2023) Metabolic Reprogramming and Altered Cell Envelope Characteristics in a Pentose Phosphate Pathway Mutant Increases MRSA Resistance to β-Lactam Antibiotics. PLOS Pathogens, 19, e1011536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 谭庆菊, 王一鸣, 周善良, 等. 金黄色葡萄球菌的分布特点及预防对策[J]. 山东医学高等专科学校学报, 2023, 45(4): 287-289.