决奈达隆与胺碘酮联合利伐沙班用于房颤射频消融术后安全性及有效性的临床研究
Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Dronedarone Combined with Amiodarone and Rivaroxaban for Atrial Fibrillation after Radiofrequency Ablation
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.162609, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 丛 晨:青岛大学青岛医学院,山东 青岛;青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院心内科,山东 烟台;朱雪峰, 初红霞*:青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院心内科,山东 烟台
关键词: 心房颤动射频导管消融术决奈达隆胺碘酮利伐沙班安全性有效性甲状腺相关异常肺毒性血药浓度房颤负荷远期复发Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Dronedarone Amiodarone Rivaroxaban Safety Efficacy Thyroid-Related Abnormalities Pulmonary Toxicity Blood Concentration Atrial Fibrillation Burden Long-Term Recurrence
摘要: 目的:前瞻性分析决奈达隆联合利伐沙班与胺碘酮联合利伐沙班用于非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者射频导管消融术(CA)后的安全性与有效性。方法:纳入600例首次接受CA治疗的非瓣膜性AF患者,随机分入决奈达隆联合利伐沙班组(D-R组)与胺碘酮联合利伐沙班组(A-R组),每组300例,各抽取80例监测利伐沙班血药浓度,对比出血事件、器官不良反应、AF空白期(术后3个月内)与远期(术后3~6个月)复发率及房颤负荷。结果 两组CRNMB (临床相关性非大出血)发生率接近(6.7% vs. 4.9%),均无大出血;监测子组利伐沙班谷、峰浓度无显著差异(P均 > 0.05)。A-R组甲状腺相关异常(11.9% vs. 1.4%)及肺部不良反应(1.1% vs. 0%)发生率显著高于D-R组(P均 < 0.05)。两组空白期复发率(23.4% vs. 22.1%)、远期复发率(12.4% vs. 11.6%)及房颤负荷[3.8% ± 1.5% vs. 3.6% ± 1.4%]无统计学差异(P均 > 0.05)。结论:决奈达隆联合利伐沙班与胺碘酮联合利伐沙班疗效相当,且在甲状腺及肺部安全性上更具优势,可作为CA术后个体化用药优选方案。
Abstract: Objective: To prospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of dronedarone combined with amiodarone and rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) following radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA). Methods: A total of 600 patients with non-valvular AF undergoing CA for the first time were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the dronedarone plus rivaroxaban group (D-R group) or the amiodarone plus rivaroxaban group (A-R group), with 300 patients in each group. Among them, 80 patients from each group were selected to monitor rivaroxaban plasma concentrations. The incidences of bleeding events, organ-related adverse reactions, AF recurrence during the blanking period (within 3 months post-CA) and the long-term period (3~6 months post-CA), as well as atrial fibrillation burden, were compared. Results: The incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) was comparable between the two groups (6.7% vs. 4.9%), with no major bleeding events reported. In the monitored subgroups, the trough and peak concentrations of rivaroxaban showed no significant difference (all P > 0.05). The A-R group had significantly higher incidences of thyroid-related abnormalities (11.9% vs. 1.4%) and pulmonary adverse reactions (1.1% vs. 0%) compared to the D-R group (all P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in blanking period recurrence rates (23.4% vs. 22.1%), long-term recurrence rates (12.4% vs. 11.6%), or atrial fibrillation burden [3.8% ± 1.5% vs. 3.6% ± 1.4%] (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: Dronedarone combined with rivaroxaban demonstrated comparable efficacy to amiodarone combined with rivaroxaban while offering advantages in thyroid and pulmonary safety, making it a preferred option for individualized treatment after CA.
文章引用:丛晨, 朱雪峰, 初红霞. 决奈达隆与胺碘酮联合利伐沙班用于房颤射频消融术后安全性及有效性的临床研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(2): 2112-2122. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.162609

参考文献

[1] Kirchhof, P., Benussi, S., Kotecha, D., et al. (2022) 2022 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in Collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal, 43, 2852-2959.
[2] Wazni, O., Marrouche, N.F., Martin, D.O., et al. (2005) Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA, 293, 2634-2640.
[3] Marrouche, N.F., Wazni, O., Chugh, A., et al. (2010) Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Trial. JAMA, 303, 333-340.
[4] Kirchhof, P., Benussi, S., Kotecha, D., Ahlsson, A., Atar, D., Casadei, B., et al. (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in Collaboration with EACTS. European Heart Journal, 37, 2893-2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Savelieva, I. and Camm, A.J. (2007) Dronedarone: A New Antiarrhythmic Drug for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Heart, 93, 1388-1395.
[6] Camillo, C., Brignole, M., Bongiorni, M.G., et al. (2010) Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction: Mechanisms, Predisposing Factors and Management. Thyroid, 20, 493-506.
[7] du Manoir, S., van Dijk, A., Kamp, O., et al. (2007) Amiodarone-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: Clinical Presentation, Treatment and Outcome in 32 Patients. Netherlands Journal of Medicine, 65, 359-364.
[8] Giustozzi, M., Sorrentino, S., De Ponti, R., et al. (2018) Drug-Drug Interactions with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Focus on Clinical Implications. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 74, 1569-1583.
[9] Connolly, S.J., Crijns, H.J., Hanff, E.A., et al. (2010) Dronedarone versus Amiodarone for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter. New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 1678-1687.
[10] 王浩, 李学奇, 于波. 胺碘酮与决奈达隆治疗心房颤动的疗效及安全性Meta分析[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(8): 632-638.
[11] 中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会, 中国医师协会心律学专业委员会. 心房颤动导管消融中国专家共识(2021) [J]. 中华心律失常学杂志, 2021, 25(4): 305-324.
[12] Eikelboom, J.W., Connolly, S.J., Brueckmann, M., et al. (2010) Definition of Major Bleeding in Clinical Investigations of Antihemostatic Medicinal Products in Non-Surgical Patients. Thrombosis Research, 126, e132-e135.
[13] TIo, H. (2019) Guidance for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Thrombosis Haemostasis, 119, 1580-1606.
[14] Hori, M., Matsumoto, M., Tanahashi, N., Momomura, S., Uchiyama, S., Goto, S., et al. (2012) Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The J-ROCKET AF Study. Circulation Journal, 76, 2104-2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]