Wiltse入路在腰椎疾病中的研究进展
Research Progress of Wiltse Approach in Lumbar Spine Disorders
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.162633, PDF,   
作者: 苗 鑫, 龚向东, 姚汝斌*:大理大学临床医学院,云南 大理
关键词: 腰椎疾病Wiltse入路研究进展Lumbar Spine Disorders Wiltse Approach Research Progress
摘要: 本文旨在综述Wiltse入路的历史发展、解剖基础、临床应用、技术革新及研究进展。重点探讨Wiltse入路的临床研究、解剖学研究,关注其手术技术细节与围手术期指标及临床疗效。据现有证据表明,Wiltse入路在腰椎后路手术中能有效完成螺钉置入、减压及植骨融合,与传统入路相比,其临床优势显著,能通过对椎旁肌的保护实现更少的组织损伤、减少术中出血、术后腰背痛、缩短住院时间。该入路已从传统的开放技术通过联合可扩张通道、内镜及导航系统辅助等转变为多元化的微创平台。Wiltse入路已成为腰椎疾病外科治疗的重要微创技术。其核心理念——通过天然解剖入路工作以最大限度地保护椎旁肌功能从而减少术中损伤而获得了强有力的循证医学支持。未来的研究方向应聚焦于复杂病例的适用性、更精细的解剖变异研究,以及不同技术变体间成本效益的比较。
Abstract: This article aims to systematically review the historical development, anatomical basis, clinical applications, technical innovations, and research advancements of the Wiltse approach. The focus is placed on clinical and anatomical studies related to the Wiltse approach, emphasizing its surgical techniques, perioperative indicators, and clinical efficacy. Existing evidence indicates that the Wiltse approach can effectively accomplish screw placement, decompression, and bone graft fusion in posterior lumbar surgeries. Compared to traditional approaches, it demonstrates significant clinical advantages, including reduced tissue trauma through the preservation of paraspinal muscles, decreased intraoperative bleeding, less postoperative back pain, and shorter hospital stays. This approach has evolved from traditional open techniques into a diversified minimally invasive platform, incorporating expandable channels, endoscopic assistance, and navigation systems. The Wiltse approach has become an important minimally invasive technique in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disorders. Its core principle—working through a natural anatomical pathway to maximize the protection of paraspinal muscle function and minimize intraoperative damage—is strongly supported by evidence-based medicine. Future research should focus on its applicability in complex cases, more detailed studies of anatomical variations, and cost-effectiveness comparisons among different technical variants.
文章引用:苗鑫, 龚向东, 姚汝斌. Wiltse入路在腰椎疾病中的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(2): 2312-2318. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.162633

参考文献

[1] Chiu, A.P., Chia, C., Arendt-Nielsen, L. and Curatolo, M. (2024) Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Low Back Pain. Minerva Anestesiologica, 90, 330-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Brinjikji, W., Luetmer, P.H., Comstock, B., Bresnahan, B.W., Chen, L.E., Deyo, R.A., et al. (2014) Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36, 811-816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Ravindra, V.M., Senglaub, S.S., Rattani, A., Dewan, M.C., Härtl, R., Bisson, E., et al. (2018) Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Estimating Global Incidence and Worldwide Volume. Global Spine Journal, 8, 784-794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Cheng, M., Xue, Y., Cui, M., Zeng, X., Yang, C., Ding, F., et al. (2025) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Low Back Pain: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 and Projections to 2050. Spine, 50, E128-E139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Chang, D., Lui, A., Matsoyan, A., Safaee, M.M., Aryan, H. and Ames, C. (2024) Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally. Neurospine, 21, 487-501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Yaman, O., Gushcha, A., Vaishya, S., Zileli, M., Zygourakis, C. and Oertel, J. (2024) The Role of Conservative Treatment in Lumbar Disc Herniations: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. World Neurosurgery: X, 22, Article ID: 100277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Pranata, R., Lim, M.A., Vania, R. and July, J. (2020) Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery versus Microscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery, 138, e450-e458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Staats, P.S., Hagedorn, J.M., Reece, D.E., Strand, N.H. and Poree, L. (2023) Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Spacers for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A 2-Year Medicare Claims Benchmark Study. Pain Practice, 23, 776-784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Fleege, C., Rickert, M. and Rauschmann, M. (2015) PLIF-und TLIF-Verfahren. Indikation, Technik, Vor-und Nachteile. Der Orthopäde, 44, 114-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Schnake, K.J., Rappert, D., Storzer, B., Schreyer, S., Hilber, F. and Mehren, C. (2018) Lumbale Spondylodese—Indikationen und Techniken. Der Orthopäde, 48, 50-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Wiltse, L.L., Bateman, J.G., Hutchinson, R.H. and Nelson, W.E. (1968) The Paraspinal Sacrospinalis-Splitting Approach to the Lumbar Spine. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 50, 919-926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Boucher, H.H. (1959) A Method of Spinal Fusion. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 41, 248-259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gautschi, O.P., Schatlo, B., Schaller, K. and Tessitore, E. (2011) Clinically Relevant Complications Related to Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracolumbar Surgery and Their Management: A Literature Review of 35,630 Pedicle Screws. Neurosurgical Focus, 31, E8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Wiltse, L.L. and Spencer, C.W. (1988) New Uses and Refinements of the Paraspinal Approach to the Lumbar Spine. Spine, 13, 696-706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Weaver, E.N. (2007) Lateral Intramuscular Planar Approach to the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 7, 270-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 单建林, 张志成, 陈萌萌, 等. 腰椎手术Wiltse入路准确进入多裂肌与最长肌间隙的解剖学基础[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(6): 631-634.
[17] Hofste, A., Soer, R., Hermens, H.J., Wagner, H., Oosterveld, F.G.J., Wolff, A.P., et al. (2020) Inconsistent Descriptions of Lumbar Multifidus Morphology: A Scoping Review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21, Article No. 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Palmer, D.K., Allen, J.L., Williams, P.A., Voss, A.E., Jadhav, V., Wu, D.S., et al. (2011) Multilevel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Multifidus-Longissimus Cleavage Planes in the Lumbar Spine and Potential Clinical Applications to Wiltseʼs Paraspinal Approach. Spine, 36, 1263-1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Vialle, R., Wicart, P., Drain, O., Dubousset, J. and Court, C. (2006) The Wiltse Paraspinal Approach to the Lumbar Spine Revisited: An Anatomic Study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 445, 175-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Prajapati, H.P. and Kumar, R. (2020) Thoracolumbar Fracture Classification: Evolution, Merits, Demerits, Updates, and Concept of Stability. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 35, 92-97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Chang, W., Zhang, D., Liu, W., Lian, X., Jiao, Z. and Chen, W. (2018) Posterior Paraspinal Muscle versus Post-Middle Approach for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Medicine, 97, e11193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Jiang, F., Li, X., Liu, L., Xie, Z., Xu, Y., Ren, G., et al. (2022) The Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery, 164, 310-322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 翟晓娜, 于芳, 冯志杰, 等. Wiltse入路与后正中入路椎弓根内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效分析[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2025, 46(5): 332-336.
[24] 董天云. 不同入路椎弓根螺钉内固定术在胸腰段脊柱骨折中的应用效果比较[J]. 大医生, 2025, 10(12): 43-45.
[25] Junhui, L., Zhengbao, P., Wenbin, X., Lu, H., Shengyun, L., Shunwu, F., et al. (2017) Comparison of Pedicle Fixation by the Wiltse Approach and the Conventional Posterior Open Approach for Thoracolumbar Fractures, Using MRI, Histological and Electrophysiological Analyses of the Multifidus Muscle. European Spine Journal, 26, 1506-1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Liu, H., Li, J., Sun, Y., Wang, X., Wang, W., Guo, L., et al. (2022) A Comparative Study of a New Retractor-Assisted WILTSE TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and Traditional PLIF for Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases. Orthopaedic Surgery, 14, 1317-1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Street, J.T., Andrew Glennie, R., Dea, N., DiPaola, C., Wang, Z., Boyd, M., et al. (2016) A Comparison of the Wiltse versus Midline Approaches in Degenerative Conditions of the Lumbar Spine. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 25, 332-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 夏进先, 祝茂松, 龚俊, 等. 椎旁肌间隙入路经关节突病灶清除椎体间植骨融合治疗腰椎间隙感染[J]. 骨科, 2022, 13(5): 458-460.
[29] 李丹, 罗冬冬, 赵海林, 等. 椎旁肌肉间隙入路手术切除胸腰椎旁肿瘤的疗效分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2023, 28(6): 383-385.
[30] Kieser, D.C., Thakar, C., Cunningham, G., Vidakovic, H., Hammer, N. and Nnadi, C. (2020) The Value of a Modified Wiltse Approach for Deformity Correction in Neuromuscular Scoliosis. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 14, 170-174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 李海俊. 经二次改良Wiltse入路脊柱手术的基础及临床研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 南京医科大学, 2015.
[32] Li, H., Yang, L., Xie, H., Yu, L., Wei, H. and Cao, X. (2015) Surgical Outcomes of Mini-Open Wiltse Approach and Conventional Open Approach in Patients with Single-Segment Thoracolumbar Fractures without Neurologic Injury. Journal of Biomedical Research, 29, 76-82.
[33] Lin, H.B., Wu, X.W., Li, R.Y., Dai, J.H. and Chen, X.H. (2010) [Metrx Quadrant System in the Surgery of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Preliminary Clinical Application]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 90, 1756-1759.
[34] Tian, N., Huang, Q., Zhou, P., Zhou, Y., Wu, R., Lou, Y., et al. (2010) Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy with Different Assisted Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. European Spine Journal, 20, 846-859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Joseph, J.R., Smith, B.W., Liu, X. and Park, P. (2017) Current Applications of Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Neurosurgical Focus, 42, E2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]