PLIF术后手术部位感染发生影响因素的 Meta分析
Meta-Analysis of Influencing Factors for the Occurrence of Surgical Site Infection after PLIF
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.162643, PDF,   
作者: 赵泽宇*, 王 磊, 于海洋:内蒙古医科大学研究生院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;杜志才#:内蒙古医科大学第二附属医院脊柱外科,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 后路腰椎间融合术感染影响因素Meta分析Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Infection Influencing Factors Meta-Analysis
摘要: 目的:系统评价后路腰椎间融合术(posterior lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF)后患者发生手术部位感染的影响因素。方法:广泛检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library等国际知名数据库,以及中国知网、万方、维普等国内权威数据库,时间跨度自各数据库建立至2024年4月1日。由两名独立的研究人员分别进行文献的初步筛选和资料提取,采用Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)对纳入的文献进行质量评分,利用RevMan 5.4和Stata 15.1两款专业统计软件,我们对提取的数据进行了深入的Meta分析。结果:最终共纳入21项研究,涉及的总样本达13,257例。结论:后路腰椎间融合术后患者发生手术部位感染的独立危险因素包括年龄 ≥ 60岁(RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.27, 2.35)、手术时间 ≥ 3 h (RR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.83, 3.08)、术后脑脊液漏(RR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.33)、糖尿病(RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.68, 2.30)、吸烟(RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.95)、饮酒(RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.19)、融合节段 ≥ 3个(RR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.59, 4.43)、术后白蛋白水平 < 3.5 g/dl (RR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.71, 6.56)、术前停留时间(RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.21)。后路腰椎间融合术后患者发生手术部位感染的独立保护因素为男性(RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.92)。
Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the influencing factors of surgical site infection in patients after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library and other internationally renowned databases, as well as domestic authoritative databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, from the establishment of each database to April 1, 2024. Two independent researchers conducted preliminary screening and data extraction, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to score the quality of the included studies, and RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.1 were used to conduct in-depth Meta-analysis of the extracted data. Results: A total of 21 studies were included, with a total sample of 13,257 cases. Conclusion: Independent risk factors for surgical site infection in patients after posterior lumbar interbody fusion include age ≥ 60 years (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.27, 2.35), operative time ≥ 3 hours (RR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.83, 3.08), postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.33), diabetes mellitus (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.68, 2.30), cigarette smoking (RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.95), alcohol consumption (RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.19), fusion segments ≥ 3 (RR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.59, 4.43), postoperative albumin level < 3.5 g/dl (RR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.71, 6.56), and length of stay before surgery (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.21). Male sex was an independent protective factor for surgical site infection after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.92).
文章引用:赵泽宇, 杜志才, 王磊, 于海洋. PLIF术后手术部位感染发生影响因素的 Meta分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(2): 2393-2405. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.162643

参考文献

[1] Radcliff, K.E., Neusner, A.D., Millhouse, P.W., Harrop, J.D., Kepler, C.K., Rasouli, M.R., et al. (2015) What Is New in the Diagnosis and Prevention of Spine Surgical Site Infections. The Spine Journal, 15, 336-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Kurtz, S.M., Lau, E., Ong, K.L., Carreon, L., Watson, H., Albert, T., et al. (2012) Infection Risk for Primary and Revision Instrumented Lumbar Spine Fusion in the Medicare Population. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 17, 342-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 陈曾丽, 蒋运兰, 彭寒梅, 等. 胃癌根治术后并发肺部感染危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 医学新知, 2023, 33(4): 252-263.
[4] 洪海南, 潘文俊, 郭宇华. 腰椎后路融合内固定术后手术切口感染的危险因素分析[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2022, 25(6): 787-790.
[5] 贺国宇, 季兴华, 冯皓宇, 等. 老年腰椎退行性疾病患者后路融合和内固定术后切口感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2022, 41(12): 1502-1507.
[6] 吴积, 王彬彬, 于晨, 等. PLIF手术部位早期感染的危险因素[J]. 西部医学, 2019, 31(3): 393-395, 402.
[7] 王如来, 熊敏, 周升. 腰椎后路融合术后急性手术部位感染的危险因素分析[J]. 骨科, 2020, 11(1): 13-18.
[8] 向渝, 刘明永, 殷翔, 等. 腰椎退行性疾病行后路内固定融合术后早期感染清创的危险因素分析[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2021, 30(2): 108-113.
[9] 张树东, 黄一琳, 李继洋. 腰椎退行性病变患者行后路腰椎椎体间融合术后手术部位感染危险因素分析[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2023, 37(12): 1245-1248.
[10] 刘春, 钱志刚, 孙启才. 腰椎滑脱症术后伤口感染危险因素分析[J]. 中国骨伤, 2019, 32(10): 882-885.
[11] 林文杰, 魏波, 符莉莉, 等. PLIF老年患者手术部位感染的病原学特点及危险因素分析[J]. 广东医科大学学报, 2021, 39(5): 575-578.
[12] 杨明, 张文涛, 柯嵩, 等. 腰椎后路融合术后手术部位感染的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2021, 10(4): 248-254.
[13] 袁世民, 丘青中. 腰椎后路融合术术后感染的危险因素分析[J]. 岭南急诊医学杂志, 2018, 23(3): 268-271.
[14] 潘军伟, 铁博然, 张凯博, 等. 初次后路腰椎间融合早期手术部位感染的相关因素[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 392-396.
[15] 李光秀. 后路腰椎椎间融合内固定病人术后切口感染的影响因素分析[J]. 全科护理, 2021, 19(7): 951-954.
[16] 李贺, 王宸, 吴小涛, 等. 腰椎后路椎间融合术后伤口感染的相关因素分析[J]. 江苏医药, 2014, 40(7): 794-796.
[17] 刘斌, 甘维, 王华富, 等. 腰椎后路融合内固定术后感染的多因素logistic回归分析[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2020, 23(6): 788-791.
[18] 桑朝辉, 任海龙, 孟湛东, 等. 后路腰椎融合内固定术后感染的危险因素分析[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2018, 38(8): 969-974.
[19] Chaichana, K.L., Bydon, M., Santiago-Dieppa, D.R., Hwang, L., McLoughlin, G., Sciubba, D.M., et al. (2014) Risk of Infection Following Posterior Instrumented Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease in 817 Consecutive Cases. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 20, 45-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Li, Z., Liu, P., Zhang, C., Xu, G., Zhang, Y., Chang, Y., et al. (2019) Incidence, Prevalence, and Analysis of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Lumbar Fusion Surgery: ≥2-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study. World Neurosurgery, 131, e460-e467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Pei, H., Wang, H., Chen, M., Ma, L., Liu, G. and Ding, W. (2021) Surgical Site Infection after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Instrumentation in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease. International Wound Journal, 18, 608-615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Qu, S., Sun, M., Sun, H. and Hu, B. (2022) C‐Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio (CAR) in Predicting Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Following Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF). International Wound Journal, 20, 92-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] He, Z., Zhou, K., Tang, K., Quan, Z., Liu, S. and Su, B. (2020) Perioperative Hypoalbuminemia Is a Risk Factor for Wound Complications Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15, Article No. 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Yang, Y., Yu, J., Xiao, Z., Kang, Y. and Zhou, B. (2023) Role of Pre-Operative Nutrition Status on Surgical Site Infection after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Study. Surgical Infections, 24, 942-948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kong, L., Liu, Z., Meng, F. and Shen, Y. (2017) Smoking and Risk of Surgical Site Infection after Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surgical Infections, 18, 206-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Okuda, S., Fujimori, T., Oda, T., Yamasaki, R., Maeno, T., Yamashita, T., et al. (2016) Patient-Based Surgical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Patient Satisfaction Analysis. Spine, 41, E148-E154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Shrestha, S., Wenju, P., Shrestha, R. and Karmacharya, R.M. (2016) Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infections in Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 14, 107-111.
[28] 金军伟, 赵刚, 和桓德, 等. 腰椎后路术后感染的治疗体会[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2017, 32(11): 1195-1196.