中外法治下绿色元宇宙的双碳协同规制研究
Research on Synergistic Regulation of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in the Green Metaverse under Chinese and Foreign Rule of Law
DOI: 10.12677/sd.2026.162072, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 崔雯君:山东理工大学法学院,山东 淄博
关键词: 绿色元宇宙碳中和双碳治理法律治理国际法Green Metaverse Carbon Neutrality Dual Carbon Governance Legal Governance International Law
摘要: 绿色元宇宙的核心价值在于全面促进碳中和目标的实现。作为一种融合了绿色经济与虚拟数字经济的新型社会形态,绿色元宇宙的发展离不开各国在碳减排技术领域的国际合作机制的构建,其成功实现则依赖于科学严谨的法律治理框架。在法律治理层面,绿色元宇宙的国内法治与国际法治的协同推进至关重要。就国内法而言,元宇宙所引发的碳排放问题,涉及相关责任主体的归责机制。其中,如何确立合理的碳减排责任规则,成为亟待解决的关键问题。在国际法层面,绿色元宇宙的全球化推进,关键在于各国采用绿色碳减排技术积极参与其中。为实现这一目标,绿色元宇宙的国内法治理需聚焦于构建元宇宙绿色能源追溯法律制度,同时企业等私人主体也应积极承担起碳减排的责任与义务。
Abstract: The core value of the green metaverse lies in fully advancing the achievement of carbon neutrality goals. As a new social form integrating the green economy and the virtual digital economy, the development of the green metaverse cannot be separated from the establishment of international cooperation mechanisms among countries in the field of carbon emission reduction technologies, and its successful implementation relies on a scientific and rigorous legal governance framework. At the level of legal governance, the coordinated advancement of domestic and international rule of law for the green metaverse is crucial. In terms of domestic law, the carbon emission issues caused by the metaverse involve the liability attribution mechanisms of relevant responsible entities. Among these, how to establish reasonable rules for carbon emission reduction liability has become an urgent key problem to be solved. At the international law level, the global advancement of the green metaverse hinges on countries’ active participation with the adoption of green carbon emission reduction technologies. To achieve this goal, the domestic legal governance of the green metaverse should focus on constructing a legal system for tracing green energy in the metaverse, while private entities such as enterprises should also actively assume their responsibilities and obligations for carbon emission reduction.
文章引用:崔雯君. 中外法治下绿色元宇宙的双碳协同规制研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(2): 204-215. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.162072

参考文献

[1] 程金华. 元宇宙治理的法治原则[J]. 东方法学, 2022(2): 24.
[2] 张钦昱. 元宇宙的规则之治[J]. 东方法学, 2022(2): 11.
[3] 赵骏. 全球治理视野下的国际法治与国内法治[J]. 中国社会科学, 2014(10): 92.
[4] 沈伟. 数字规制的场景、困境与进路: 作为法治场域的元宇宙[J]. 政法论丛, 2024(3): 27.
[5] Zhou, C., Zhang, W., Richardson-Barlow, C. and Zhang, Z. (2025) Navigating Carbon Neutrality: Policy Pathways and Consistency on Industrial Decarbonization in China. Carbon Balance and Management, 20, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Yue, C., Zang, J., He, G., Luo, B., Liu, X., Zhang, L., et al. (2026) Mitigation Strategies for Achieving Carbon Neutrality in the Iron and Steel Industry—A Case Study of Sichuan, China. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 29, Article ID: 101476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 陈海嵩. 国家环境保护义务的溯源与展开[J]. 法学研究, 2014(3): 75.
[8] 唐金环, 吴宛亭, 陈曦. 区块链技术在碳交易体系中的应用研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2023(5): 78.
[9] 刘冰玉. 气候治理投资安排: 溯源、沿革与新路径[J]. 法商研究, 2024(4): 60.
[10] 邵莉莉. 碳中和背景下国际碳排放治理的“共同责任”构建——共同但有区别责任的困境及消解[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(2): 36.
[11] 马腾. 以环境法权范式取代环境权利范式——从环境法现实体系出发[J]. 政治与法律, 2024(8): 135.
[12] 田少帅. 数字经济背景下元宇宙空间的法律治理[J]. 北方法学, 2024, 18(5): 140.
[13] 樊轶侠, 徐昊. 中国数字经济发展能带来经济绿色化吗?——来自我国省际面板数据的经验证据[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021(9): 20.
[14] Raghutla, C., Afroz, S. and Chittedi, K.R. (2025) Environmental Policy and Renewable Energy Pathways to Carbon Neutrality. Discover Environment, 3, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 葛金芬. 元宇宙中身份型虚拟数字人的风险及其刑法规制[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(5): 107.
[16] Yan, S. (2025) Analysis of How Green Finance Helps Enterprises Achieve Low-Carbon Transformation. Financial Economics Research, 3, 18-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 张夏恒. 元宇宙融合新质生产力的价值维度、实现困境及推进路径[J]. 中州学刊, 2024(2): 59.