电商平台中绿色企业的定价策略研究:基于消费者细分的博弈视角
Research on Pricing Strategies of Green Marketing Enterprises in E-Commerce Platforms: A Game-Theoretic Perspective Based on Consumer Segmentation
摘要: 在电商平台推动绿色消费转型的背景下,企业如何通过绿色营销与定价策略实现竞争优势,已成为管理实践与学术研究的关键议题。本文基于霍特林模型,构建了一个包含绿色营销企业与普通企业的双寡头竞争模型,将消费者细分为深绿与浅绿两类,探讨了在统一定价与差异化定价策略下的企业博弈行为。通过理论推导与数值模拟,系统分析了绿色营销成本系数、消费者类型结构及偏好差异对企业定价、市场份额与利润的影响。研究发现,在电商环境中,绿色营销企业能够凭借环保属性获取价格溢价,尤其当双方采用统一定价时,其利润表现最优;而差异化定价虽可精准匹配细分需求,但也可能加剧竞争并压缩利润空间。本文从平台运营与数据赋能的角度,为企业制定绿色产品定价策略提供了理论依据与实践启示,对电商生态中的可持续竞争策略具有参考价值。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of e-commerce platforms driving the transition toward green consumption, how firms can achieve competitive advantage through green marketing and pricing strategies has become a critical issue in both managerial practice and academic research. Building on the Hotelling model, this study develops a duopoly competition framework that includes one green-marketing firm and one conventional firm. Consumers are segmented into “deep-green” and “light-green” types, and the strategic interactions between firms under uniform pricing versus differentiated pricing schemes are examined. Through theoretical derivation and numerical simulation, the study systematically investigates how the green marketing cost coefficient, the composition of consumer types, and preference heterogeneity affect firms’ pricing decisions, market shares, and profitability. The findings reveal that, in an e-commerce context, the green-marketing firm can command a price premium due to its environmental attributes—particularly under uniform pricing, where it achieves the highest profit. Although differentiated pricing allows for more precise alignment with segment-specific demand, it may intensify competition and erode profit margins. From the perspectives of platform operations and data-enabled decision-making, this research offers theoretical grounding and practical insights for firms designing pricing strategies for green products, providing valuable implications for sustainable competitive strategies within e-commerce ecosystems.
文章引用:石悦宇. 电商平台中绿色企业的定价策略研究:基于消费者细分的博弈视角[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(2): 694-704. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.152207

参考文献

[1] 乔时, 姚唐, 王宁, 等. “外察”与“内省”: 环境威胁引发的绿色消费意愿研究——基于道德情绪的双路径模型[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(1): 137-149.
[2] 姚锋敏, 闫颍洛, 李玥, 等. 环境责任视角下供应链的绿色设计与绿色营销决策[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(6): 255-265.
[3] 马述忠, 郭继文. “价格取胜”还是“口碑至上”——基于产品质量视角的电商企业营销策略研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2021(3): 112-120.
[4] 王璐, 马庆庆, 杨劼, 等. 基于复杂网络演化博弈的绿色消费者对新能源汽车扩散的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 74-85.
[5] 李锋, 魏莹. 平台电商的用户细分策略及行为定价[J]. 系统管理学报, 2023, 32(2): 260-275.
[6] 黄祎, 孙广生, 田海峰. 环境偏好、创新成本与企业的环境战略选择: 基于Hotelling空间模型的分析[J]. 系统工程, 2022, 40(2): 78-85.
[7] 白世贞, 赵喜莹. 线上零售商免退货运费险服务策略研究——基于Hotelling模型的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(8): 85-90, 222.
[8] 杨光, 刘新旺, 秦晋栋, 等. 双渠道异质产品市场背景下的概率销售策略[J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 34(5): 1049-1059.
[9] 李响, 刘凤致. “杀熟”还是“一视同仁”?——竞争环境下创新型产品的定价策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2025, 45(12): 4187-4199.
[10] 孙嘉轶, 杜伟龙. 不同供应链结构下消费市场对本土制造业中断动态恢复策略影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 1-18.
https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGGK20250911008.htm, 2025-02-25.
[11] 王今朝, 窦一凡, 黄丽华. 单一供方情境下竞争企业的数据购买策略[J]. 管理科学学报, 2025, 28(4): 47-62.
[12] 夏德, 张云东, 张逸石. 定向绿色广告情景下绿色消费行为演化路径[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(4): 1282-1303.
[13] 赵爱武, 杜建国, 关洪军. 绿色购买行为演化路径与影响机理分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11): 163-170.
[14] 楼高翔, 裘银浩, 夏海洋. 考虑研发努力与营销投入的绿色供应链协调[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(4): 131-139.