二氧化碳地质封存过程中断层活化光纤监测适用性研究
A Study on the Applicability of Fault Activation Monitoring Using Fiber Optics during Carbon Dioxide Geological Sequestration Process
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2026.162019, PDF,   
作者: 王杉杉:成都理工大学能源学院(页岩气现代产业学院),四川 成都
关键词: 二氧化碳地质封存光纤监测数值模拟流固耦合CO2 Geosequestration Fiber Optic Monitoring Numerical Simulation Hydro-Mechanical Coupling
摘要: 二氧化碳地质封存是一种将工业产生和大气中捕获的二氧化碳气体安全地储存到地下储层中,并防止其泄露进入大气层对气候造成影响的技术。现有研究表明断层活化、盖层破裂及井筒失效等因素会导致二氧化碳地质封存过程中的泄漏,需要借助监测手段进行安全性监测。分布式光纤传感技术因其井下无电源、抗电磁能力强以及可大范围监测等特性,广泛应用于石油、土木等领域,但尚未应用于二氧化碳地质封存泄露监测。本文首先介绍二氧化碳地质封存技术和光纤监测技术的研究现状及意义,整理归纳目前二氧化碳地质封存典型项目。而后,选定阿尔及利亚In salah二氧化碳封存项目的Krechba气田作为研究区域,通过数值模拟研究了二氧化碳地质封存过程中断层活化光纤监测的应用场景,并探究了二氧化碳注入压力对监测效果的影响。结果表明,随着二氧化碳不断注入,当遇到断层时,会优先沿渗透率更高的断层运移,断层内压力骤增,光纤监测点处会产生明显的拉张应变信号,且不同地质和工程参数会对应变信号特征产生显著影响。研究结果对于分布式光纤监测技术在二氧化碳地质封存过程中的实际应用具有重要参考价值,并为进一步优化监测方案和提高封存系统的安全性提供了理论基础。
Abstract: Carbon dioxide geological sequestration is a technology that safely stores industrial and captured CO2 gas underground in reservoirs, preventing its release into the atmosphere and mitigating its impact on climate. Existing studies have shown that factors such as fault activation, cap rupture and wellbore failure will lead to leakage during the geological storage of carbon dioxide, and safety monitoring needs to be carried out with the help of monitoring methods. Distributed optical fiber sensing technology is widely used in petroleum, civil engineering and other fields due to its characteristics of no underground power supply, strong electromagnetic resistance and large-scale monitoring, but has not yet been applied to carbon dioxide geological storage leakage monitoring. This paper first introduces the research status and significance of carbon dioxide geological storage technology and optical fiber monitoring technology and summarizes the current typical projects of carbon dioxide geological storage. Then, the Krechba gas field of the in salah CO2 storage project in Algeria was selected as the research area, and the application scenarios of fault layer activation fiber monitoring in the process of CO2 geological storage were studied through numerical simulation CO2 injection pressure on the monitoring effect were explored. The results show that with the continuous injection of carbon dioxide, when encountering faults, it will preferentially migrate along faults with higher permeability, the pressure in the faults will increase sharply, obvious tensile strain signals will be generated at the optical fiber monitoring points, and different geological and engineering parameters will have a significant impact on the characteristics of strain signals. The research results have important reference value for the practical application of distributed optical fiber monitoring technology in the process of CO2 geological storage, and provide a theoretical basis for further optimizing the monitoring scheme and improving the security of the storage system.
文章引用:王杉杉. 二氧化碳地质封存过程中断层活化光纤监测适用性研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(2): 189-199. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.162019

参考文献

[1] 赵改善. 二氧化碳地质封存地球物理监测:现状、挑战与未来发展[J]. 石油物探, 2023, 62(2): 194-211.
[2] 舒娇娇. 深部咸水层封存二氧化碳迁移规律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2020.
[3] 宫玉菲. CO2封存物性参数分析及地质精准建模研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2020.
[4] 贺凯. CO2地质封存系统完整性演化及其泄漏研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2019.
[5] 王金龙, 崔大伟, 郭萍. 二氧化碳深部含盐水层地质封存国际研究进展及启示[J]. 环境保护, 2013, 41(17): 71-72.
[6] 王晓桥, 马登龙, 夏锋社, 张晓明, 王瑜, 毛维高. 封储二氧化碳泄漏监测技术的研究进展[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(2): 23-34.
[7] 霍传林. 我国近海二氧化碳海底封存潜力评估和封存区域研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2014.
[8] 柳玉昕. 二氧化碳埋存对储层及盖层的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2017.
[9] 张军, 李桂菊. 二氧化碳封存技术及研究现状[J]. 能源与环境, 2007(2): 33-35.
[10] 姜睿. 国内外CCUS项目现状分析及展望[J]. 安全、健康和环境, 2022, 22(4): 1-4+21.
[11] 王建秀, 吴远斌, 于海鹏. 二氧化碳封存技术研究进展[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(1): 81-90.
[12] 戴靠山, 陈亘, 宋学行, 潘永东. 二氧化碳地质封存工程安全研究现状及地脉动法监测可行性初步分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2012, 28(5): 159-169.
[13] 李光, 刘建军, 刘强, 纪佑军. 二氧化碳地质封存研究进展综述[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2016, 3(4): 41-48.
[14] 马劲风, 杨杨, 蔡博峰, 曹丽斌, 周颖, 李琦. 不同类型二氧化碳地质封存项目的环境监测问题与监测范围[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(2): 10-14.
[15] 刘枫. 二氧化碳地质封存环境监测现状及建议[J]. 农家参谋, 2017(13): 219.
[16] 李琦, 刘桂臻, 张建, 贾莉, 刘海丽. 二氧化碳地质封存环境监测现状及建议[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(6): 718-727.
[17] 郝艳军, 杨顶辉. 二氧化碳地质封存的数值模拟和地震监测研究[C]//中国地球物理学会. 中国地球物理2012. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2012: 551.
[18] 蔡博峰. 二氧化碳地质封存项目及环境监测[J]. 低碳世界, 2013(1): 38-41.
[19] 杨扬, 马劲风, 李琳. CO2地质封存四维多分量地震监测技术进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(10): 1119-1126.
[20] 白云云, 师洋阳, 卢美娟, 梁颖. 双碳目标下CO2地质封存泄露途径及监测方法研究进展[J]. 榆林学院学报, 2021, 31(6): 43-46.
[21] 金显杭, 方佳伟, 王永胜, 冯良兴, 刘昕, 张卫东. 咸水层. CO2地质封存泄漏监测的示踪剂优选[J]. 天然气化工(C1化学与化工), 2020, 45(5): 72-76.
[22] 赵海英, 陈沅忠, 李彦鹏, 刘国军, 李陶, 夏淑君, 范含周. CO2地质封存时移垂直地震监测技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(8): 3095-3102.
[23] 朱鹏飞. 基于深度学习的覆岩变形分布式光纤监测数据推测[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2021.
[24] 赵丽芝, 唐福建. 分布式光纤裂缝监测实验与数值分析[J]. 中国测试, 2022, 48(12): 7-14.
[25] Daley, T.M., Myer, L.R., Peterson, J.E., Majer, E.L. and Hoversten, G.M. (2008) Time-Lapse Crosswell Seismic and VSP Monitoring of Injected CO2 in a Brine Aquifer. Environmental Geology, 54, 1657-1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Hopp, C., Guglielmi, Y., Rinaldi, A.P., Soom, F., Wenning, Q., Cook, P., et al. (2022) The Effect of Fault Architecture on Slip Behavior in Shale Revealed by Distributed Fiber Optic Strain Sensing. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127, e2021JB022432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Sidenko, E., Tertyshnikov, K., Gurevich, B. and Pevzner, R. (2022) DAS Signature of Reservoir Pressure Changes Caused by a CO2 Injection: Experience from the CO2-CRC Otway Project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 119, Article 103735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Zhang, Y., Lei, X., Hashimoto, T. and Xue, Z. (2021) Toward Retrieving Distributed Aquifer Hydraulic Parameters from Distributed Strain Sensing. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, e2020JB020056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Liu, Y.Z., Wu, K., Jin, G., Moridis, G.J., Kerr, E., Scofield, R., et al. (2020) Strain and Strain-Rate Responses Measured by LF-DAS and Corresponding Features for Fracture-Hit Detection during Multiple-Fracture Propagation in Unconventional Reservoirs. Proceedings of the 8th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Online, 20-22 July 2020, 1134-1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Shi, B., Zhang, D., Zhu, H., Zhang, C., Gu, K., Sang, H., et al. (2021) DFOS Applications to Geo-Engineering Monitoring. Photonic Sensors, 11, 158-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Habel, W.R. and Krebber, K. (2011) Fiber-Optic Sensor Applications in Civil and Geotechnical Engineering. Photonic Sensors, 1, 268-280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Ugueto, G.A., Wojtaszek, M., Mondal, S., Guzik, A., Jurick, D. and Jin, G. (2021) New Fracture Diagnostic Tool for Unconventionals: High-Resolution Distributed Strain Sensing via Rayleigh Frequency Shift during Production in Hydraulic Fracture Test 2. Proceedings of the 9th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, 26-28 July 2021, URTeC, D021S031R002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Liu, Y.Z., Jin, G. and Wu, K. (2021) New Insights on Characteristics of the Near-Wellbore Fractured Zone from Simulated High-Resolution Distributed Strain Sensing Data. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 25, 99-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Jin, G., Ugueto, G., Wojtaszek, M., Guzik, A., Jurick, D. and Kishida, K. (2021) Novel Near-Wellbore Fracture Diagnosis for Unconventional Wells Using High-Resolution Distributed Strain Sensing during Production. SPE Journal, 26, 3255-3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] 韦世明, 郝亚龙, 隋微波, 等. 不同倾角水力裂缝扩展的邻井光纤监测信号特征研究[J]. 石油科学通报, 2024, 9(5): 764-776.
[36] 陈铭, 郭天魁, 翁定为, 等. 基于裂缝前缘邻井光纤应变的压裂裂缝参数解释方法[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1282-1295+1308.
[37] You, S.H., Liao, Q., Yue, Y., Tian, S., Li, G. and Patil, S. (2025) Enhancing Fracture Geometry Monitoring in Hydraulic Fracturing Using Radial Basis Functions and Distributed Acoustic Sensing. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 16, 260-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef