数字化视角下我国科技创新效率研究——基于三阶段DEA模型
Efficiency of Technological Innovation in China from a Digital Perspective—Based on Three-Stage DEA Model
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.152217, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 安 静*, 李沛航, 李 晨:南京邮电大学管理学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 数字化数字资本科技创新效率三阶段DEADigital Digital Capital Efficiency of Technology Innovation Three-Stage DEA
摘要: 中国的数字化转型对实现“高质量”发展至关重要。技术创新能够催生新兴产业、新型模式和经济增长点,从而推动中国数字化进程。因此,提升中国科技创新效率至关重要。伴随以数据驱动平台和软件解决方案为特征的数字化进程,数字资本在评估区域科技创新中发挥关键作用。本研究采用三阶段DEA (Three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis)方法,将数字资本纳入对中国31个省(直辖市、自治区) 2022年创新效率的评估体系。研究发现,规模优化是中国各省(直辖市、自治区)提升创新效率的首要内部因素。环境因素、管理效率及随机干扰同样影响创新效率,可能导致调整前的评估结果被高估。总体而言,这些因素凸显了中国多数省(直辖市、自治区)数字基础设施的稳健性,为数字资本积累奠定坚实基础,进而提升科技创新效率。
Abstract: China’s digital transformation is pivotal for achieving “high-quality” development. Technological innovation can catalyze the emergence of new industries, models, and economic drivers, thus to propel China’s digital evolution. Therefore, improving the efficiency of China’s technological innovation is of utmost importance. Aligned with digital progress, characterized by data-driven platforms and software solutions, digital capital plays a crucial role in assessing regional innovation in science and technology. This study integrates digital capital into the evaluation of innovation efficiency in 31 Chinese provinces (municipalities, autonomous regions) in 2022 using a three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The findings argue that scale optimization is the primary internal factor for enhancing innovation efficiency in Chinese provinces (municipalities, autonomous regions). Environmental factors, management inefficiency, and random disturbances also influence innovation efficiency, potentially leading to over-estimations before adjustments. Overall, these factors under-score the robust digital infrastructure in most Chinese provinces (municipalities, autonomous regions), providing a solid foundation for digital capital and enhancing technological innovation efficiency.
文章引用:安静, 李沛航, 李晨. 数字化视角下我国科技创新效率研究——基于三阶段DEA模型[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(2): 781-791. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.152217

参考文献

[1] Buesa, M., Heijs, J. and Baumert, T. (2010) The Determinants of Regional Innovation in Europe: A Combined Factorial and Regression Knowledge Production Function Approach. Research Policy, 39, 722-735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Fritsch, M. and Slavtchev, V. (2009) How Does Industry Specialization Affect the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems? The Annals of Regional Science, 45, 87-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Yalçın, E.C. (2021) Efficiency Measurement of Digitalization on EU Countries: A Study Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 10, 323-333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Dong, H., Bae, K.H. and Zhang, M. (2022) A Study on Technological Innovation Efficiency of Listed Companies in China’s Digital Cultural Industry. Journal of Korea Contents Association, 22, 369-379.
[5] Kryzhko, D., Rudskaya, I., Skhvediani, A. and Alamshoev, A. (2020). Evaluation of Technical Efficiency of Regional Innovation System on the Basis of DEA Modeling. Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy: SPBPU IDE-2020, St. Petersburg, 22-23 October 2020, 1-6.[CrossRef
[6] Xu, Y., Hu, J. and Wu, L. (2023) Efficiency Evaluation of China’s Provincial Digital Economy Based on a DEA Cross-Efficiency Model. Mathematics, 11, Article No. 3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Wang, X. and Zang, M. (2019) Evaluation on Technology Innovation Efficiency of Big Data Enterprises Based on DEA. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 9, 145-148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Rudskaya, I., Kryzhko, D., Shvediani, A. and Missler-Behr, M. (2022) Regional Open Innovation Systems in a Transition Economy: A Two-Stage DEA Model to Estimate Effectiveness. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, Article No. 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] He, J., Lau, W.T. and Liu, Y. (2023) Innovative Production Efficiency in Chinese High-Tech Industries during the 13th Five-Year Plan Considering Environmental Factors: Evidence from a Three-Stage DEA Model. Green and Low-Carbon Economy, 2, 37-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Guan, J.C., Yam, R.C.M., Mok, C.K. and Ma, N. (2006) A Study of the Relationship between Competitiveness and Technological Innovation Capability Based on DEA Models. European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 971-986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Feng, M. and Li, X. (2020) Evaluating the Efficiency of Industrial Environmental Regulation in China: A Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, Article ID: 118535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Graves, S.B. and Langowitz, N.S. (1996) R&D Productivity: A Global Multi-Industry Comparison. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53, 125-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 袁永仪, 袁勤俭. 数字资本视角下我国省域科技创新效率研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(9): 114-123+173.
[14] 吴翌琳, 王天琪. 数字经济的统计界定和产业分类研究[J]. 统计研究, 2021, 38(6): 18-29.
[15] Dian, J., Song, T. and Li, S. (2024) Facilitating or Inhibiting? Spatial Effects of the Digital Economy Affecting Urban Green Technology Innovation. Energy Economics, 129, Article ID: 107223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Qin, Y., Zhang, P., Deng, X. and Liao, G. (2023) Innovation Efficiency Evaluation of Industrial Technology Research Institute Based on Three-Stage DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 224, Article ID: 120004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Xu, X. and Zhou, Y. (2021) Efficiency Evaluation of Green Innovation in Chinese Eight Comprehensive Economic Areas Based on Three-Stage Malmquist Index. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30, 2863-2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef