高校校园交通安全风险评估及治理研究——以山东科技大学为例
Research on Traffic Safety Risk Assessment and Management in University Campuses—A Case Study of Shandong University of Science and Technology
摘要: 为推动校园交通安全治理向数据驱动、精准施策转型,以校园多功能叠加区为研究对象,综合采用安全检查表法和问卷调查法,识别出人车混行、停车资源失衡等六类核心风险,并从物理、管理、行为、文化四方面剖析风险生成机制。建立AHP-熵权法组合评价模型,评价C区餐厅前十字路口区域交通安全风险,并揭示“空间–时间–行为–管理”多维事故致因,进而提出“空间重构、时间错峰、行为引导、动态管控”四位一体的精细化治理方案。研究形成的“识别–评价–致因–治理”框架与组合模型,可为高校类似区域的风险管控提供理论与实践参考。
Abstract: To advance campus traffic safety governance toward data-driven, precision-targeted measures, this study examines multifunctional overlapping zones on campuses. By integrating safety checklist methods and questionnaire surveys, six core risks were identified—including mixed pedestrian-vehicle traffic and parking resource imbalance—and their generation mechanisms analyzed across physical, managerial, behavioral, and cultural dimensions. An AHP-Entropy Weighting combined evaluation model was established to assess traffic safety risks at the crossroads near Zone C’s cafeteria. This revealed multidimensional accident causes spanning “space - time - behavior - management,” leading to a four-pronged precision governance solution: spatial restructuring, time-shifting, behavioral guidance, and dynamic control. The resulting “identification - evaluation - causation - governance” framework and composite model provide theoretical and practical references for risk management in similar university zones.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
曾峥. 高校校内道路交通管理问题及其法律对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2021.
|
|
[2]
|
邓昂, 杨捷. 基于AHP-熵权法-博弈论法的低压居民用电故障危险度综合评价[J]. 科技与创新, 2025(19): 21-24.
|
|
[3]
|
马永荣. 高校校园交通安全管理的困境与优化路径[J]. 现代职业安全, 2024(9): 46-48.
|
|
[4]
|
成俊杰, 白晋龙, 郑立新. 新形势下高校校园交通安全管理的模式探究[J]. 科技风, 2020(7): 262-263.
|
|
[5]
|
聂旭明. 高校校园交通安全管理的模式探究——以杭州电子科技大学下沙校区为例[J]. 高校后勤研究, 2025(4): 35-36+40.
|