MBBR工艺对低浓度飞机除冰废水的处理效果研究
Study on the Treatment Effect of MBBR Process on Low-Concentration Aircraft Deicing Wastewater
DOI: 10.12677/ije.2026.151023, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 崔晓宇*, 万晓红#:中国水利水电科学研究院,水生态环境研究所,北京;张 涛, 代学民:河北建筑工程学院市政与环境工程系,河北 张家口
关键词: 飞机除冰废水MBBR悬浮生物载体CODcrAircraft Deicing Wastewater MBBR Suspended Biological Carriers CODcr
摘要: 为解决南方低浓度飞机除冰废水的治理难题,针对现有方法能耗或成本偏高的局限,本研究开展MBBR工艺小试与中试试验。小试采用Kaldnes K5填料,经三阶段驯化,控制溶解氧(DO)浓度2~4 mg/L、填料填充比40%,化学需氧量(COD)平均去除率达82.6%,总氮(TN)去除率多数时段超90%;中试采用薯片填料与“缺氧池 + 好氧池”工艺,处理实际废水时COD去除率稳定在78.88%~82.50%,验证了规模放大可行性。该工艺依托分层生物膜与三相流化优势实现高效处理,为工程化应用提供数据支撑。
Abstract: To solve the treatment problem of low-concentration aircraft deicing wastewater in southern China and address the limitations of high energy consumption or cost of existing methods, this study conducted lab-scale and pilot-scale experiments on the MBBR (Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor) process. For the lab-scale test, Kaldnes K5 carriers were used, and after three-stage acclimation, the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was controlled at 2~4 mg/L with a carrier filling ratio of 40%. The average chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate reached 82.6%, and the total nitrogen (TN) removal rate exceeded 90% in most periods. For the pilot-scale test, potato chip-shaped carriers and the “anoxic tank + aerobic tank” process were adopted. When treating actual wastewater, the COD removal rate remained stable at 78.88%~82.50%, verifying the feasibility of scale-up. Relying on the advantages of layered biofilm and three-phase fluidization, the process achieves efficient treatment, providing data support for engineering application.
文章引用:崔晓宇, 张涛, 万晓红, 代学民. MBBR工艺对低浓度飞机除冰废水的处理效果研究[J]. 世界生态学, 2026, 15(1): 220-227. https://doi.org/10.12677/ije.2026.151023

参考文献

[1] 国务院. 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划纲要[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2025.
[2] Corsi, S.R., et al. (2022) A Discrete-Event Simulation Tool for Airport Deicing Activities: Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. Simulation, 98, 501-517.
[3] 路海锋, 崔伟. 北京大兴国际机场除冰废水处理及再生系统设计应用[J]. 给水排水, 2022, 58(S2): 273-276.
[4] 魏芳, 庞宗宇, 赵强. Fenton氧化法在飞机除冰废水处理中的研究进展[J]. 自然科学, 2022, 10(5): 728-741.
[5] Darlington, C. and Kennedy, K.J. (1998) Biodegradation of Aircraft Deicing Fluid in an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Reactor. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 33, 339-351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Lehto, J., Heikkinen, J., Kyllönen, H., Hakala, J. and Suomalainen, M. (2021) Purification of Spent Deicing Fluid by Membrane Techniques. Water Science and Technology, 84, 2014-2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Wang, F., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y. and Zhang, J. (2024) Performance of Traditional and Emerging Water-Treatment Technologies in the Removal of Tetracycline Antibiotics. Catalysts, 14, Article No. 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 国家环境保护局. 污水综合排放标准: GB 8978-1996 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1996.
[9] Madan, S., Madan, R. and Hussain, A. (2022) Advancement in Biological Wastewater Treatment Using Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR): A Review. Applied Water Science, 12, Article No. 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[11] Majid, A. and Mahna, M. (2019) Application of Lab-Scale MBBR to Treat Industrial Wastewater Using K3 Carriers: Effects of HRT, High COD Influent, and Temperature. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 20, 35-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kawan, J.A., et al. (2016) A Review on Sewage Treatment and Polishing Using Moving Bed Bioreactor (MBBR). Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 11, 1098-1120.
[13] Leyva-Díaz, J.C., González-Martínez, A., Muñío, M.M. and Poyatos, J.M. (2015) Two-Step Nitrification in a Pure Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor-Membrane Bioreactor for Wastewater Treatment: Nitrifying and Denitrifying Microbial Populations and Kinetic Modeling. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 99, 10333-10343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Kermani, M., et al. (2009) Biological Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater Using Moving Bed Biofilm Process. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 19-27.