间层辐照消融模式与逐层辐照消融模式在HIFU治疗子宫肌瘤中的有效性对比:一项回顾性研究
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Inter-Slice Sonication Ablation Pattern and Slice-by-Slice Sonication Pattern in HIFU Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Retrospective Comparative Study
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.163756, PDF,   
作者: 康智鸿:重庆医科大学第二临床学院,重庆;周 崑*:重庆医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤治疗临床中心,重庆
关键词: HIFUEEF子宫肌瘤间层辐照消融模式逐层辐照消融模式能效因子消融率HIFU EEF Uterine Fibroids Inter-Slice Sonication Ablation Pattern Slice-by-Slice Sonication Ablation Pattern Energy Efficiency Factor Ablation Ratio
摘要: 目的:对比间层辐照消融模式与逐层辐照消融模式在高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗子宫肌瘤中的有效性及安全性,探讨新模式的临床应用价值。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,纳入2019年1月至2024年5月227例单发子宫肌瘤患者(最大直径2.5~10 cm),按治疗方式分为间层辐照组(n = 73)和逐层辐照组(n = 154)。逐层辐照组采用“点–面–体”逐层消融,间层辐照组仅选取三个等分切面消融。主要评价指标为术后MRI评估的消融率(非灌注体积比)及能效因子(EEF);次要指标包括治疗时间、平均功率及术后短期并发症(疼痛、皮肤水肿等)。采用非参数秩和检验、卡方检验进行统计分析,并基于肌瘤位置(前壁/后壁)进行亚组分析。结果:间层辐照消融组的消融率(76.38% ± 1.67%)显著高于逐层辐照消融组(73.06% ± 0.82%, P = 0.007),且治疗时间显著缩短(388.84 ± 23.61 s vs. 544.83 ± 24.78 s, P = 0.002);但两组间平均功率(333.73 ± 51.54 W vs. 336.79 ± 41.21 W, P = 0.824)及能效因子(EEF: 5.28 ± 0.95 vs. 3.99 ± 0.32, P = 0.275)无统计学差异。安全性方面,两组术后短期并发症(疼痛、皮肤水肿、阴道溢液及神经症状)发生率均无统计学差异(P > 0.05),且所有并发症严重程度均为CTCAE 1~2级。结论:间层辐照消融模式在保证安全性的前提下,显著缩短HIFU治疗时间并提高消融效率。其机制可能与声能量重分布及“损伤–损伤”效应增强有关,为优化子宫肌瘤HIFU治疗提供了新方向。
Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the Inter-Slice Sonication Ablation Pattern versus the Slice-by-Slice Sonication Ablation Pattern in High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of uterine fibroids, assessing the clinical value of the novel pattern. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 227 patients with solitary uterine fibroids (maximum diameter 2.5~10 cm) treated between January 2019 and May 2024. Patients were divided into the Inter-Slice Sonication group (n = 73) and the Slice-by-Slice Sonication group (n = 154). The Slice-by-Slice Sonication group received standard “point-by-point” layered ablation; the Inter-Slice Sonication group underwent ablation targeting only three equally spaced planes within the fibroid. Primary outcomes were ablation ratio (non-perfused volume ratio assessed by postoperative MRI) and Energy Efficiency Factor (EEF). Secondary outcomes included treatment time, average power, and short-term postoperative complications (pain, skin edema, etc.). Statistical analysis employed the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test, and subgroup analysis was conducted based on the location of the fibroid (anterior wall/posterior wall). Results: The Inter-Slice Sonication group demonstrated a significantly higher ablation ratio (76.38% ± 1.67%) compared to the Slice-by-Slice Sonication group (73.06% ± 0.82%; P = 0.007) and significantly shorter treatment time (388.84 ± 23.61 s vs. 544.83 ± 24.78 s; P = 0.002). No significant differences existed in average power (333.73 ± 51.54 W vs. 336.79 ± 41.21 W; P = 0.824) or EEF (5.28 ± 0.95 vs. 3.99 ± 0.32; P = 0.275). Both groups exhibited comparable incidence rates of short-term postoperative complications (pain, skin edema, vaginal discharge, neurological symptoms; all P > 0.05). All complications were mild (CTCAE grade 1~2). Conclusion: The Inter-Slice Sonication Ablation Pattern significantly reduces HIFU treatment time and improves ablation efficiency while maintaining safety. This efficacy may arise from enhanced ultrasound energy redistribution and “damage-damage” interference effects, offering a promising new approach for optimizing HIFU fibroid treatment.
文章引用:康智鸿, 周崑. 间层辐照消融模式与逐层辐照消融模式在HIFU治疗子宫肌瘤中的有效性对比:一项回顾性研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.163756

参考文献

[1] De Maio, A., Alfieri, G., Mattone, M., Ghanouni, P. and Napoli, A. (2024) High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Surgery for Tumor Ablation: A Review of Current Applications. Radiology: Imaging Cancer, 6, e230074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Kwas, K., Nowakowska, A., Fornalczyk, A., Krzycka, M., Nowak, A., Wilczyński, J., et al. (2021) Impact of Contraception on Uterine Fibroids. Medicina, 57, Article 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Lee, D.W., Gibson, T.B., Carls, G.S., Ozminkowski, R.J., Wang, S. and Stewart, E.A. (2009) Uterine Fibroid Treatment Patterns in a Population of Insured Women. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 566-574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Kyeong, H., Choi, J., Na, Y. and Kim, H. (2023) Effects of Long-Term Intermittent Pharmacological Therapy with Ulipristal Acetate on Reducing the Volume of Uterine Fibroids and Relieving Symptoms. Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology, 75, 236-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Chen, Y., Yi, J., Lin, S., Xie, X., Liu, X. and Guo, S. (2025) Reproductive Outcomes of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation and Myomectomy for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 50, 104436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Wang, Y., Gong, C., He, M., Lin, Z., Xu, F., Peng, S., et al. (2023) Therapeutic Dose and Long-Term Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Different Types of Uterine Fibroids Based on Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 40, Article ID: 2194594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Park, M.J., Kim, Y., Rhim, H. and Lim, H.K. (2014) Safety and Therapeutic Efficacy of Complete or Near-Complete Ablation of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroid Tumors by MR Imaging-Guided High-Intensity Focused US Therapy. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 25, 231-239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Stewart, E.A., Gostout, B., Rabinovici, J., Kim, H.S., Regan, L. and Tempany, C.M.C. (2007) Sustained Relief of Leiomyoma Symptoms by Using Focused Ultrasound Surgery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 110, 279-287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Shen, L., Huang, X., Liu, Y., Bai, S., Wang, F. and Yang, Q. (2025) Multi-Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Combined with Imaging Features Predicts the Difficulty of HIFU Treatment of Uterine Fibroids. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Su, Z., Liu, S., Wang, J., Jin, F., Peng, Y. and Wen, J. (2025) Retrospective Cohort Study on the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Non-Invasive Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas and Adenomyosis. Abdominal Radiology, 50, 4995-5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] deSouza, N.M., Gedroyc, W., Rivens, I. and ter Haar, G. (2022) Tissue Specific Considerations in Implementing High Intensity Focussed Ultrasound under Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article 1037959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Ali, M.M., Raphael Mpehle, C., Olusola, E., Ratshabedi, P.K., Ragab Shehata, A., Ashraf Youssef, M., et al. (2024) A Systematic Review of the Side Effects of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 37, 947-956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kuemmerli, C., Sijberden, J.P., Cipriani, F., Osei-Bordom, D., Aghayan, D., Lanari, J., et al. (2024) Is Prolonged Operative Time Associated with Postoperative Complications in Liver Surgery? An International Multicentre Cohort Study of 5424 Patients. Surgical Endoscopy, 38, 7118-7130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Shi, L., Zhang, R., Tao, S., Yuan, X., Zhang, J., Wang, B., et al. (2023) Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation in Women with Multiple Uterine Fibroids: An Exploratory Study. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 49, 2378-2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Xue, H., Wu, S., Xiao, K., Ding, G. and Chen, S. (2024) Sonographic Features of Uterine Fibroids That Predict the Ablation Rate and Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. Frontiers in Oncology, 14, Article 1451626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]