信息不对称困境下二手电商消费者权益保护的法律路径研究
Research on the Legal Paths for Protecting Consumers’ Rights and Interests in Second-Hand E-Commerce under the Dilemma of Information Asymmetry
摘要: 数字经济与循环经济的深度融合推动二手电商市场迅猛发展,但交易的虚拟性、商品的非标准化及主体身份的复杂性,加剧了买卖双方的信息不对称困境,导致消费者知情权、公平交易权、求偿权等权益受侵害问题频发。本文以信息不对称理论与消费者权益保护理论为依托,结合二手电商交易的实践特征,系统剖析信息不对称在交易各环节的表现形态及其引发的法律风险,包括商品质量信息不透明、经营者身份认定模糊、平台监管责任虚化、纠纷解决机制低效等。通过梳理我国现行《消费者权益保护法》《电子商务法》等相关规范在二手电商领域的适用困境,借鉴现有研究成果与司法实践经验,从立法完善、监管强化、平台责任细化、权利救济优化四个维度,构建针对性的法律保护路径。研究提出,应明确二手商品信息披露标准与经营者认定规则,建立分层分类的平台监管机制,完善举证责任分配与在线纠纷解决制度,以破解信息不对称带来的权益保护难题,促进二手电商市场的规范化发展与数字消费生态的良性构建。
Abstract: The in-depth integration of the digital economy and the circular economy has driven the rapid development of the second-hand e-commerce market. However, the virtual nature of transactions, the non-standardization of commodities, and the complexity of subject identities have exacerbated the information asymmetry dilemma between buyers and sellers, leading to frequent infringements on consumers’ rights and interests such as the right to know, the right to fair trade, and the right to claim compensation. Based on the information asymmetry theory and the consumer rights protection theory, this paper combines the practical characteristics of second-hand e-commerce transactions to systematically analyze the manifestations of information asymmetry in various links of transactions and the resulting legal risks, including opaque commodity quality information, vague identification of operator identities, weakened platform supervision responsibilities, and inefficient dispute resolution mechanisms. By sorting out the application dilemmas of China’s current relevant norms such as the Consumer Rights and Interests Protection Law and the E-Commerce Law in the field of second-hand e-commerce, and drawing on existing research results and judicial practice experience, this paper constructs targeted legal protection paths from four dimensions: legislative improvement, supervision strengthening, platform responsibility refinement, and right relief optimization. The research proposes that it is necessary to clarify the information disclosure standards for second-hand commodities and the identification rules for operators, establish a hierarchical and classified platform supervision mechanism, and improve the burden of proof allocation and online dispute resolution system, so as to solve the problem of rights and interests protection caused by information asymmetry, and promote the standardized development of the second-hand e-commerce market and the sound construction of the digital consumption ecosystem.
文章引用:李震洋. 信息不对称困境下二手电商消费者权益保护的法律路径研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(3): 53-61. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.153247

参考文献

[1] 莫蕙源. 闲置物品平台交易的消费者权益保护研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2023.
[2] 张子琪. 闲置物品网络交易中消费者权益保护的法律问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2022.
[3] 轩岩. C2C闲置物品交易中的消费者权益保护问题与对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西宁: 青海师范大学, 2024.
[4] 陈盼. 二手商品网络平台交易中消费者权益保护问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 包头: 内蒙古科技大学, 2025.
[5] 王怡然. 电商购物中消费者权益的经济法保护研究[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2025(10): 74-76.
[6] 吕来明, 陈天舒. 二手物品网络交易平台的运行机制及义务承担规则[J]. 商业经济研究, 2021(24): 111-114.
[7] 石沁灵. 二手车买卖合同欺诈的司法认定[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 自贡: 四川轻化工大学, 2023.
[8] 马淑萍, 吕富生. 健全我国数字经济下的消费者权益保护制度[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2022, 36(7): 1-7.
[9] Akerlof, G.A. (1970) The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhao, M., Wang, S. and Xia, T. (2025) The Social Welfare Effect of E-Commerce Product Reputation Information Asymmetry from the Perspective of Network Externality. PLOS ONE, 20, e0313852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Wang, L. and Chen, H. (2023) Platform Externality, Asymmetric Information, and Counterfeit Governance in E-Commerce. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 50, 123-145.
[12] Tandon, A., et al. (2024) Tackling Consumer Information Asymmetry and Perceived Uncertainty for Online Second-Hand Luxury Items. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103.
[13] European Commission (2025) Protecting EU Consumers: More Than Half of Second-Hand Online Traders Fail to Meet EU Consumer Laws. European Commission.
[14] CCPC (Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, Ireland) (2025) European Sweep of Websites Selling Second-Hand Goods Finds More than Half Potentially Breaking Consumer Law.
[15] Liang, X., Li, G., Ma, J. and Jiang, G. (2024) How Do Signaling and Reputation Function as Critical Clues to E-Commerce Platform Governance? Evidence from Chinese Rice Transaction Data. Electronic Commerce Research, 25, 3637-3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Youn, S., Hwang, J. and Ju, N. (2025) Blockchain Transparency in Reducing Second-Hand Luxury Shopping Uncertainty and the Role of Price Consciousness. Fashion and Textiles, 12, Article No. 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] OECD (2022) The Role of Online Marketplaces in Enhancing Consumer Protection. OECD Going Digital Policy Note.
[18] 张少峰. 互联网二手交易领域惩罚性赔偿的适用及其规制[J]. 哈尔滨学院学报, 2021, 42(7): 61-64.
[19] 侯佳蕙. 网络购物消费者反悔权规则的适用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020.
[20] 罗光锐. 二手闲置物品网络交易平台提供者的侵权责任认定问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州民族大学, 2019.
[21] 康静怡. 《电子商务法》对消费者知情权的保护——围绕《电子商务法》第十七条展开[J]. 人民法治, 2018(20): 32-35.
[22] 李建红, 罗晓萌, 史伟扬. 信息不对称下第三方电商平台质量监管机制——基于双边市场理论[J]. 系统管理学报, 2023, 32(4): 853-864.
[23] 陈玉书. 我国跨境电商B2B交易欺诈成因分析及对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2019.
[24] 程啸. 侵权责任法教程[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2022: 512-518.
[25] 张新宝. 互联网上的侵权问题研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社: 2003: 453.
[26] 王小璇. 论我国C2C闲置物品交易中的消费者权益保护[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北经贸大学, 2020.