辩论式教学在《人工智能导论》课程中的融合实践
A Practical Integration of Debate-Based Teaching in the “Introduction to Artificial Intelligence” Course
摘要: 《人工智能导论》课程作为通识基础课,其讲授易侧重于深度学习,机器学习等算法原理及AIGC工具的使用上,而忽略学生对技术所带来影响的深层思考。为破除该教学瓶颈,本研究结合课程特征,设计并实施以“人工智能的利与弊?”为主题的全班辩论式教学活动,并构建了三层技术关联性框架,将学生学习到的算法知识有机融合到辩论环节中。此外,本研究还设计学生自评、同学互评与教师评价相结合的多维度评价体系。实践表明,该教学方法不仅能让学生自发回顾课堂所学、清晰算法流程还能激发学生对技术带来的影响产生多角度思考。该研究对新工科背景下相似课程教学设计与实践具有一定指导意义。
Abstract: As a foundational general education course, “Introduction to Artificial Intelligence” tends to prioritize the principles of algorithms such as deep learning and machine learning, as well as the operation of AIGC tools, while often neglecting students’ in-depth reflection on the implications of AI technology. To address this pedagogical bottleneck, this study, aligned with the course’s characteristics, designed and implemented a class-wide debate-based teaching activity themed “The Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence?”. Concurrently, a three-tiered technology relevance framework was constructed to organically integrate students’ acquired algorithmic knowledge into the debate sessions. Furthermore, a multi-dimensional assessment system was developed, incorporating student self-evaluation, peer review, and instructor assessment. Practical implementation indicates that this teaching approach not only prompts students to independently revisit classroom learning content and clarify algorithmic workflows but also stimulates their multi-perspective thinking on the impacts of AI technology. This research holds certain significance for the instructional design and practice of analogous courses in the context of emerging engineering education.
文章引用:李晓婉, 吴芃, 豆增发, 张顺利, 黄雅文, 张怀聪. 辩论式教学在《人工智能导论》课程中的融合实践[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(3): 40-46. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.163449

参考文献

[1] 李航. 统计学习方法[M]. 第2版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2019.
[2] 何婧. 人工智能背景下《数值分析》教学改革的思考[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(8): 827-831.
[3] Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014) Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Jonassen, D.H. and Kim, B. (2009) Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Design Justifications and Guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 439-457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Asterhan, C.S.C. and Schwarz, B.B. (2016) Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories. Educational Psychologist, 51, 164-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Sun, C., Zhang, R., Lu, Y., Cui, Y., Deng, Z., Cao, D., et al. (2024) Toward Ensuring Safety for Autonomous Driving Perception: Standardization Progress, Research Advances, and Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25, 3286-3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Shakya, A.K., Pillai, G. and Chakrabarty, S. (2023) Reinforcement Learning Algorithms: A Brief Survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 231, Article ID: 120495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chauhan, V.K., Dahiya, K. and Sharma, A. (2018) Problem Formulations and Solvers in Linear SVM: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52, 803-855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y. and Choi, A. (2022) A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields. Electronics, 11, Article No. 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 杨宗凯, 王俊, 吴砥, 等. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对教育的影响探析及应对策略[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 26-35.
[11] Tang, C., Abbatematteo, B., Hu, J., Chandra, R., Martín-Martín, R. and Stone, P. (2025) Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: A Survey of Real-World Successes. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 8, 153-188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 刘春荣. “辩论式教学”在思想政治理论课教学中的探索与应用[J]. 思想政治教育研究, 2010, 26(5): 75-77.
[13] 申继亮, 刘加霞, 继亮申, 等. 论教师的教学反思[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2004, 22(3): 44.