高校教师人工智能胜任力及其定量评价
Artificial Intelligence Competency of Higher Education Faculty and Its Quantitative Evaluation
摘要: 以推动高校教师发展为目的,提出高校教师AI胜任力定量评价指标体系,体系涵盖教学、科研、教研等教育教学场景和掌握力、扩展力、卓越力递增能力结构,采用熵权TOPSIS法对参与问卷调查的受访者评估胜任力,并运用t-test与ANOVA比较不同人口统计学变量间胜任力的差异性。研究结果表明:1) 高校教师人工智能胜任力整体上处于中度略微偏上水平,结构上呈现出低厚顶尖的金字塔结构。2) 相较于掌握力和拓展力,卓越力是高校教师人工智能胜任力的关键影响因素。3) 高校教师人工智能胜任力在教龄、职称上表现出显著差异性,低职称、小教龄群体表现出更高的胜任力。在量化分析的基础上,从促进技术熟练到教学以及教科研深入融合等方面提出提升建议。
Abstract: To advance the professional development of higher education faculty, this study proposes a quantitative evaluation framework for AI competency. The framework encompasses educational scenarios including teaching, research, and pedagogical activities, structured around progressively enhanced competencies: Mastery Ability, Expansion Capability, and Excellence Power. Entropy-weighted TOPSIS analysis was employed to assess competency among survey respondents, while t-tests and ANOVA were used to compare competency differences across demographic variables. The findings reveal: 1) Higher education faculty AI competency generally resides at a moderately high level, exhibiting a pyramid structure characterized by a low base and narrow top. 2) Compared to mastery ability and expansion capability, excellence power is the key determinant of university faculty AI competency. 3) Significant differences in AI competency were observed across teaching experience and professional title, with lower-title and less-experienced groups demonstrating higher competency. Based on quantitative analysis, improvement recommendations were proposed, ranging from enhancing technical proficiency to deepening the integration of teaching, research, and educational practice.
文章引用:涂现峰. 高校教师人工智能胜任力及其定量评价[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(3): 56-62. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.163451

参考文献

[1] 王一岩, 吴国政, 郑永和. 生成式人工智能赋能教育信息科学与技术研究: 新机遇、新趋势、新议题[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2024, 36(6): 46-54.
[2] 赵磊磊, 嬴萍丽, 付天祎. 数智化时代教师技术焦虑的现象学观照[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2024(2): 102-113.
[3] 范建丽, 张新平. 大数据 + 智能时代的教师数智胜任力模型研究[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2022, 40(4): 65-74.
[4] 谭诚. 嬗变与提升: “双一流”建设视野下高校教师核心胜任力建构的理路与进路[J]. 江苏高教, 2024(4): 63-71.
[5] Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J. (2006) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 吕立杰, 荆鹏. 以教师教育现代化培养卓越教师, 助力人才强国[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(4): 12-15+18.
[7] 聂力. 大学数学教学质量现状及提高对策[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2014, 16(6): 122-124.
[8] 缪静敏, 沈苑, 汪琼. 生成式人工智能如何改变教学?——来自高校教师的实践叙事[J]. 中国远程教育, 2025, 45(5): 75-91.
[9] 黄宗媛, 吴臻, 蒋晓芸. 大学数学一流课程建设与实践[J]. 中国大学教学, 2021(3): 27-31+2.
[10] 牛端. 高校教师科研与教学关系的实证研究[J]. 大学教育科学, 2018(4): 51-57+126.
[11] 钟海燕, 刘举. 在科研与教学之间: 试论高校青年教师的学术困境[J]. 当代教育科学, 2014(15): 28-31.
[12] Younis, B. (2025) The Artificial Intelligence Literacy (AIL) Scale for Teachers: A Tool for Enhancing AI Education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 41, 37-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Zhao, L.L., Wu, X.F. and Luo, H. (2022) Developing AI Literacy for Primary and Middle School Teachers in China: Based on a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Sustainability, 14, Article 14549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Ayanwale, M.A., Adelana, O.P., Molefi, R.R., Adeeko, O. and Ishola, A.M. (2024) Examining Artificial Intelligence Literacy among Pre-Service Teachers for Future Classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 江长斌, 徐紫琪, 王宏宇, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的高校师德师风类网络舆情风险评估预警研究[J]. 情报科学, 2024, 42(6): 113-120.