遗传预测的强直性脊柱炎与肾恶性肿瘤风险的因果关联:一项基于FinnGen的两样本孟德尔随机化研究
Causal Association between Genetically Predicted Ankylosing Spondylitis and the Risk of Malignant Neoplasm of the Kidney: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study Based on FinnGen
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.163797, PDF,   
作者: 李德域:黑龙江中医药大学研究生院,黑龙江 哈尔滨;宋寒冰*:黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院骨伤三科,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 强直性脊柱炎肾恶性肿瘤孟德尔随机化遗传预测FinnGenAnkylosing Spondylitis Ankylosing Spondylitis Malignant Kidney Neoplasm Mendelian Randomization Genetic Prediction FinnGen
摘要: 目的:探讨遗传预测的强直性脊柱炎(ankylosing spondylitis, AS)与肾恶性肿瘤(不含肾盂)风险之间的潜在因果关系。方法:采用两样本孟德尔随机化(Mendelian randomization, MR)设计,暴露为FinnGen数据库的强直性脊柱炎(GWAS ID:finn-b-M13_ANKYLOSPON;病例数1462,对照数164,682,总样本量166,144),结局为肾恶性肿瘤(不含肾盂) (GWAS ID:finn-b-C3_KIDNEY_NOTRENALPELVIS;病例数971,对照数217,821,总样本量218,792)。以全基因组显著性阈值P < 5 × 108筛选AS相关工具变量,并进行LD去相关(r2 = 0.001,窗口10,000 kb)。结局侧允许使用LD代理SNP (r2 ≥ 0.8)以提高匹配率。等位基因协调采用action = 2,并进行Steiger方向性过滤。主要分析采用逆方差加权法(IVW, multiplicative random effects),并辅以加权中位数法(weighted median)及MR-Egger回归验证稳健性。通过Cochran’s Q检验评估异质性,MR-Egger截距检验与MR-PRESSO评估水平多效性,并采用留一法(leave-one-out)检验单个SNP对结果的影响。工具变量强度以F统计量评估。结果:共纳入11个工具变量,均通过协调与方向性过滤。工具变量强度良好(F统计量最小值32.90,均值约308.60)。IVW结果显示,遗传预测的AS与肾恶性肿瘤风险升高显著相关(β = 0.0394, SE = 0.0145, P = 0.0066; OR = 1.040, 95%CI: 1.011~1.070)。加权中位数与MR-Egger结果方向一致且同样达到统计学显著(weighted median: OR = 1.047, 95%CI: 1.004~1.093, P = 0.0319; MR-Egger: OR = 1.068, 95%CI: 1.009~1.130, P = 0.0495)。敏感性分析未提示异质性(Q检验P = 0.777)、方向性水平多效性(MR-Egger截距P = 0.277)或离群工具变量(MR-PRESSO global P = 0.862, outlier = 0)。留一法提示剔除任一单个SNP后总体效应方向保持一致。结论:遗传预测的强直性脊柱炎与肾恶性肿瘤(不含肾盂)风险升高存在统计学相关性,提示AS可能是肾癌风险增加的潜在因果因素之一。仍需在其他人群与独立数据集中进一步验证,并结合机制研究阐明其生物学基础。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the potential causal association between genetically predicted ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and the risk of malignant neoplasm of the kidney (except renal pelvis). Methods: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed using FinnGen summary statistics: AS (finn-b-M13_ANKYLOSPON; 1462 cases and 164,682 controls) and kidney cancer excluding renal pelvis (finn-b-C3_KIDNEY_NOTRENALPELVIS; 971 cases and 217,821 controls). Instrumental SNPs were selected at P < 5 × 10−8 and clumped (r2 = 0.001, 10,000 kb); outcome-side proxies were allowed (r2 ≥ 0.8). Alleles were harmonized (action = 2) and Steiger filtering was applied. IVW multiplicative random-effects was the primary method, with weighted median and MR-Egger as sensitivity analyses; Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test. Horizontal pleiotropy was evaluated using the MR-Egger intercept test and the MR-PRESSO method. A leave-one-out analysis was performed to assess the influence of individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the overall estimate. Instrument strength was evaluated using the F statistic. Results: A total of 11 instrumental variables were included, all of which passed harmonization and directional filtering. The instruments demonstrated strong strength (minimum F statistic = 32.90; mean F statistic ≈ 308.60). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) analysis showed that genetically predicted AS was significantly associated with an increased risk of malignant kidney neoplasm (β = 0.0394, SE = 0.0145, P = 0.0066; OR = 1.040, 95% CI: 1.011~1.070). The weighted median and MR-Egger methods yielded consistent effect directions and also reached statistical significance (weighted median: OR = 1.047, 95% CI: 1.004~1.093, P = 0.0319; MR-Egger: OR = 1.068, 95% CI: 1.009~1.130, P = 0.0495). Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of heterogeneity (Cochran’s Q test, P = 0.777), directional horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept, P = 0.277), or outlier instruments (MR-PRESSO global test, P = 0.862; outliers = 0). The leave-one-out analysis demonstrated that the overall effect estimate remained stable after sequential removal of each SNP. Conclusion: Genetically predicted ankylosing spondylitis was statistically associated with an increased risk of malignant kidney neoplasm (excluding renal pelvis cancer), suggesting that AS may be a potential causal risk factor for renal cancer. Further validation in independent populations and datasets is warranted, and mechanistic studies are needed to elucidate the underlying biological pathways.
文章引用:李德域, 宋寒冰. 遗传预测的强直性脊柱炎与肾恶性肿瘤风险的因果关联:一项基于FinnGen的两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 341-349. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.163797

参考文献

[1] 牛涛, 周逢海. 炎症与肿瘤微环境[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2023, 48(12): 1899-1913.
[2] 高兰, 樊勇, 张卓莉. 强直性脊柱炎合并恶性肿瘤31例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 962-965.
[3] Davey Smith, G. and Ebrahim, S. (2003) ‘Mendelian Randomization’: Can Genetic Epidemiology Contribute to Understanding Environmental Determinants of Disease? International Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 廖华远, 蒋优, 郭嘉忱, 等. 孟德尔随机化分析骨质疏松症、骨密度与骨坏死的因果关系[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2025, 31(12): 1772-1780.
[5] 孙鹤立. 基于校正横向多效性的孟德尔随机化方法及其在疾病因果推断中的应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西医科大学, 2021.
[6] Kurki, M.I., Karjalainen, J., Palta, P., et al. (2022) FinnGen: Unique Genetic Insights from Combining Isolated Population and National Health Register Data. medRxiv.
[7] 俞洋, 孟丹, 仇奕文, 等. 两样本孟德尔随机化法分析1型糖尿病对结直肠癌的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2024, 44(6): 755-761.
[8] Zeng, F.Y., Shen, P., Guo, W.J., He, G.L., et al. (2024) Exploring the Causal Relationship between Coagulation Function and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus through Mendelian Randomization Analysis. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 57, 580-587.
[9] Hemani, G., Tilling, K. and Davey Smith, G. (2017) Orienting the Causal Relationship between Imprecisely Measured Traits Using GWAS Summary Data. PLOS Genetics, 13, e1007081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G. and Burgess, S. (2015) Mendelian Randomization with Invalid Instruments: Effect Estimation and Bias Detection through Egger Regression. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44, 512-525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P.C. and Burgess, S. (2016) Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genetic Epidemiology, 40, 304-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Verbanck, M., Chen, C., Neale, B. and Do, R. (2018) Detection of Widespread Horizontal Pleiotropy in Causal Relationships Inferred from Mendelian Randomization between Complex Traits and Diseases. Nature Genetics, 50, 693-698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Skrivankova, V.W., Richmond, R.C., Woolf, B.A.R., Davies, N.M., Swanson, S.A., VanderWeele, T.J., et al. (2021) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomisation (STROBE-MR): Explanation and Elaboration. BMJ, 375, n2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]