小学儿童诚信概念的垂直隐喻发展:认知表征与行为外化的差异
The Vertical Metaphor Development of Integrity in Primary School Children: Differences between Cognitive Representation and Behavioral Externalization
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.163114, PDF,   
作者: 张承宇, 陈永涌*:青海师范大学教育学院,青海 西宁
关键词: 小学儿童垂直隐喻诚信具身认知Primary School Children Vertical Metaphor Integrity Embodied Cognition
摘要: 本研究从认知表征与社会行为两个维度出发,考察小学儿童诚信概念的垂直隐喻发展。实验一采用迫选范式,结果显示,小学二年级儿童已初步建立“上–诚信、下–不诚信”的空间隐喻联结,且该联结随年级逐步增强。实验二采用图片启动范式,在学业情境中检验空间隐喻对诚信行为的影响。结果发现,垂直启动对诚信行为的整体作用较弱,且未表现出稳定的年龄效应。综合两项实验结果,研究提示小学儿童诚信发展可能呈现出“认知先行、行为滞后”的特征,并尝试提出“表征–价值–控制”的三链条解释性框架。本研究为理解诚信概念的具身认知基础及其行为外化的边界条件提供了经验材料,并对教育情境中如何在不同动机水平下促进儿童诚信行为具有一定的启示意义。
Abstract: This study examined the vertical metaphor development of integrity in primary school children from the perspectives of cognitive representation and social behavior. Experiment 1 employed a forced-choice paradigm and found that children in Grade 2 had already established an “up-integrity, down-dishonest” spatial metaphor, which gradually strengthened across grades. Experiment 2 used a picture-priming paradigm to test the effect of vertical spatial cues on integrity behavior in an academic context. The results indicated that the overall effect of vertical priming on integrity behavior was weak and did not exhibit a stable age-related pattern. Taken together, the findings suggest that the development of integrity in elementary school children may be characterized by “an asynchrony between cognitive representation and behavioral expression, such that cognitive representations precede behavioral enactment”. On the basis of these results, the present study tentatively proposes a “representation-value-control” interpretive framework to account for the relationship between integrity-related representations and behavior. The findings provide empirical evidence for the embodied cognitive basis of the integrity concept and help delineate the boundary conditions under which such representations are translated into behavior, offering implications for promoting integrity-related behavior in educational settings under varying motivational conditions.
文章引用:张承宇, 陈永涌 (2026). 小学儿童诚信概念的垂直隐喻发展:认知表征与行为外化的差异. 心理学进展, 16(3), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.163114

参考文献

[1] 翟冬雪, 鲁雅乔, 鲁忠义(2016). 儿童道德概念垂直空间隐喻的认知发展. 心理科学, 39(5), 1171-1176.
[2] 贺晓玲, 陈俊, 刘灵, 张甜(2021). 3-5岁幼儿职业声望垂直空间、大小双重隐喻发展. 心理发展与教育, 37(4), 457-464.
[3] Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right-and Left-Handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Casey, B. J., Giedd, J. N., & Thomas, K. M. (2000). Structural and Functional Brain Development and Its Relation to Cognitive Development. Biological Psychology, 54, 241-257.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Cheng, L., Guan, Y., Zhang, T., Zhan, L., Liu, Y., Wang, P. et al. (2024). An Empirical Study on the Development of Metaphorical Comprehension of Chinese Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1254129.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Galvan, A., Hare, T. A., Parra, C. E., Penn, J., Voss, H., Glover, G. et al. (2006). Earlier Development of the Accumbens Relative to Orbitofrontal Cortex Might Underlie Risk-Taking Behavior in Adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6885-6892.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Gellel, A., Deguara, J., & Formosa, J. (2024). Supporting Young Children’s Metaphorical Engagement through a Symbol Literacy Approach. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 22, 471-487.[CrossRef
[9] Kanngiesser, P., Sunderarajan, J., & Woike, J. K. (2021). Keeping Them Honest: Promises Reduce Cheating in Adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34, 183-198.[CrossRef
[10] Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and Social Exclusion: Morality, Prejudice, and Group Identity. Wiley.[CrossRef
[11] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press.
[12] Leng, J., & Wu, J. (2019). Integrity Perceptions and Behavior Triggered by the Hand-over-Chest Gesture: A Semiotic Perspective. Language and Semiotic Studies, 5, 20-47.[CrossRef
[13] Pohl, J., & Miklashevsky, A. (2025). Vertical and Horizontal Space-Valence Associations: A Meta-Analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 170, Article 106054.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Santana, A. N. de, Roazzi, A., & Nobre, A. P. M. C. (2025). Game-Based Cognitive Training and Its Impact on Executive Functions and Math Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 256, Article 106257.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Scattolin, M., Panasiti, M. S., Villa, R., & Aglioti, S. M. (2022). Reduced Ownership over a Virtual Body Modulates Dishonesty. iScience, 25, Article 104320.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Siegler, R. S., Eisenberg, N., DeLoache, J. S., Saffran, J. R., & Gershoff, E. T. (2022). How Children Develop (7th ed.). Worth Publishers.
[17] Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2013). I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them. PLOS ONE, 8, e59510.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person-Situation Perspective. Review of General Psychology, 19, 249-277.[CrossRef
[19] Zelazo, P. D. (2020). Executive Function and Psychopathology: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 431-454.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and Cool Executive Function in Childhood and Adolescence: Development and Plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 354-360.[CrossRef
[21] Zou, X., Xie, B., Peng, W., Ji, M., Qin, D., & Yuan, J. (2025). The Effect of Emotional Information on Chinese Word Segmentation Is Influenced by Word Locations. Acta Psychologica, 258, Article 105238.[CrossRef] [PubMed]