泰安土壤湿度变化及其与气温和降水的线性相关和非线性因果分析
Soil Moisture Dynamics in Tai’an: Linear Correlation and Nonlinear Causality Analysis with Temperature and Precipitation
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2026.152030, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 邹 潇, 朱 霞, 陈洪儒, 邹俊丽, 徐 祎:泰安农业气象试验站,山东 泰安;孙丽莉:五大连池市气象局,黑龙江 黑河
关键词: 土壤湿度气温降水相关性非线性因果Soil Moisture Temperature Precipitation Correlation Nonlinear Causality
摘要: 基于泰安市各县市2015~2024年气象观测站的气温、降水数据和土壤水分观测数据,结合Mann-Kendall非参数检验法和Sen斜率估计法量化土壤湿度的时空变化趋势及其显著性;通过Pearson相关分析揭示气温、降水与土壤湿度的线性统计关联;利用基于核的格兰杰因果方法(KGC)量化气温与降水对土壤湿度的非线性驱动作用。结果表明:(1) 土壤湿度分异:新泰呈显著上升趋势,而东平、宁阳呈显著下降趋势,趋势持续性可能导致未来水分亏缺风险加剧;5~6月为土壤湿度低值期,此期为区域土壤水分保持的关键风险期;(2) 降水为全域关键驱动因子,与土壤湿度显著正相关(新泰站最强),KGC检验证实其非线性因果影响;(3) 气温调控具有区域异质性:除新泰外,其余站点气温与土壤湿度显著负相关;泰安与肥城两站点同时受降水和气温非线性因果影响;(4) 区域特殊性:新泰存在气温非线性因果影响但统计关联不显著,提示内部复杂机制;东平–宁阳带缺乏气温独立因果贡献,土壤干旱风险主要由降水亏缺主导,气温起依附性放大作用。本研究为区域水资源管理及干旱风险防控提供依据,后续需融合人类活动深化驱动解析。
Abstract: Based on the temperature, precipitation data and soil moisture observation data from meteorological observation stations across counties of Tai’an City from 2015 to 2024, this study employed the Mann-Kendall non-parametric test combined with Theil-Sen estimator to quantify spatiotemporal trends. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to assess linear statistical associations between temperature/precipitation and soil moisture. The Kernel Granger Causality (KGC) was further introduced to quantify nonlinear causal effects of temperature and precipitation on soil moisture. Results demonstrated that: (1) Soil moisture differentiation: Xintai demonstrates a statistically significant increasing trend, while Dongping and Ningyang show a significant decreasing trend, and the continuity of the trend may lead to an increased risk of water deficit in the future; The period from May to June marks a low soil moisture phase, representing a critical risk period for maintaining regional soil water retention. (2) Precipitation as a key driver across the domain is significantly and positively correlated with soil moisture (strongest in Xintai), and KGC confirms its non-linear causal effect; (3) Temperature regulation exhibits regional heterogeneity: Significant negative correlations exist between temperature and soil moisture at all sites except Xintai. Both Tai’an and Feicheng are subject to nonlinear causal effects from precipitation and temperature. (4) Regional specificity: In Xintai, significant nonlinear causal effects of temperature were detected despite statistically insignificant correlations, suggesting complex internal regulatory mechanisms; Dongping and Ningyang lack independent causal contributions from temperature, where soil drought risk is predominantly driven by precipitation deficits, with temperature acting as an amplifying factor. This study provides a scientific basis for regional water resource management and drought risk mitigation. Future research should advance causal attribution by integrating anthropogenic drivers.
文章引用:邹潇, 朱霞, 孙丽莉, 陈洪儒, 邹俊丽, 徐祎. 泰安土壤湿度变化及其与气温和降水的线性相关和非线性因果分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2026, 15(2): 251-260. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2026.152030

参考文献

[1] 王丹, 南瑞, 韩俊杰, 等. 黑龙江省土壤湿度及其对气温和降水的敏感性分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2012, 28(2): 49-53.
[2] 王信增, 焦峰, 刘源鑫, 等. 不同空间尺度土壤水分与环境因素的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(2): 319-323.
[3] 刘立文, 段永红, 赵涛. 山西省土壤湿度时空分布及气候因素的耦合[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(11): 4250-4255.
[4] 董金义, 罗敏, 孟凡浩, 等. 蒙古高原土壤水分时空格局演变特征分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(2): 110-121.
[5] 严啟蕾, 高琳, 曹强, 等. 安徽省浅层土壤湿度时空分布及与气温和降水的相关性[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024(16): 104-109.
[6] 王信增, 焦峰. 基于有序聚类法的土壤水分剖面划分[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(2): 191-196+201.
[7] 张霞, 段亚雯, 段建平, 等. 基于蒸散发构建的日干旱指数及其对区域干旱事件的表征分析[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2022, 52(3): 540-558.
[8] Yuan, X., Ma, F., Wang, L., Zheng, Z., Ma, Z., Ye, A., et al. (2016) An Experimental Seasonal Hydrological Forecasting System over the Yellow River Basin Part 1: Understanding the Role of Initial Hydrological Conditions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20, 2437-2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 吴东丽, 李琪, 薛红喜, 等. 山东省土壤水分时空分布规律及分区[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2019, 35(3): 639-645.
[10] 王征. 陕西省土壤湿度时空变化特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 城市勘测, 2023(5): 71-76.
[11] 李轩, 过志峰, 吴门新, 等. 华北地区土壤水分的时空变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4203-4211.
[12] 符淙斌, 董文杰, 温刚, 等. 全球变化的区域响应和适应[J]. 气象学报, 2003(2): 245-250.
[13] 孙凤华, 杨素英, 陈鹏狮. 东北地区44年的气候暖干化趋势分析及可能影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005(7): 751-755+762.
[14] 徐勇峰, 郭俨辉, 季淮, 等. 洪泽湖湿地杨树林土壤水分变化及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(1): 20-28.
[15] 黄勇, 邱旭敏, 黄国贵. 淮河流域表层土壤湿度时空特征及其与地面降水的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(4): 561-569.
[16] Nemani, R.R., Keeling, C.D., Hashimoto, H., Jolly, W.M., Piper, S.C., Tucker, C.J., et al. (2003) Climate-driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999. Science, 300, 1560-1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 白晓英, 马筛艳, 梁奇琛, 等. 咸阳30年土壤湿度变化特征及影响因子分析[J]. 陕西气象, 2024(2): 50-53.
[18] Pavlidis, E.G., Paya, I. and Peel, D.A. (2015) Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Real Exchange Rate-Consumption Relation. Economics Letters, 132, 13-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 刘宏伟, 余钟波, 崔广柏. 湿润地区土壤水分对降雨的响应模式研究[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 40(7): 822-829.
[20] 杜俊杉, 马英, 胡晓农, 等. 基于双稳定同位素和MixSIAR模型的冬小麦根系吸水来源研究[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6611-6622.
[21] Tang, Y. and Zhang, X. (2024) A Three-Dimensional Sampling Design Based on the Coefficient of Variation Method for Soil Environmental Damage Investigation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196, Article No. 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Shan, N., Shi, Z., Yang, X., Gao, J. and Cai, D. (2015) Spatiotemporal Trends of Reference Evapotranspiration and Its Driving Factors in the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Project Region, China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 200, 322-333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Sen, P.K. (1968) Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall’s Tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 1379-1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Theil, H. (1950) A Rank-Invariant Method of Linear and Polynomial Regression Analysis. Indagationes mathematicae, 12, Article 173.
[25] 曹洁萍, 迟道才, 武立强, 等. Mann-Kendall检验方法在降水趋势分析中的应用研究[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2008(5): 35-37+40.
[26] Ohlson, J.A. and Kim, S. (2014) Linear Valuation without OLS: The Theil-Sen Estimation Approach. Review of Accounting Studies, 20, 395-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Shawe-Taylor, J. and Cristianini, N. (2004). Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef
[28] Marinazzo, D., Pellicoro, M. and Stramaglia, S. (2008) Kernel Method for Nonlinear Granger Causality. Physical Review Letters, 100, Article 144103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Marinazzo, D., Pellicoro, M. and Stramaglia, S. (2008) Kernel-Granger Causality and the Analysis of Dynamical Networks. Physical Review E, 77, Article 056215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] 丁旭, 赖欣, 范广洲. 中国不同气候区土壤湿度特征及其气候响应[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2016, 36(4): 28-35.