基于iWrite平台的应用型高校英语智能写作教学模式建构研究
Research on the Construction of an English Intelligent Writing Teaching Model for Applied Colleges Based on the iWrite Platform
摘要: 针对应用型高校英语写作教学中长期存在的师生比失衡、反馈滞后及学用分离等问题,本研究旨在探索智能技术赋能教学改革的新路径。本研究以文秋芳教授的产出导向法为理论框架,依托iWrite英语写作教学与评阅平台的智能诊断与AIGC功能,构建了一套线上线下融合、人机协同互补的智能写作教学模式,确立了人机互补、过程聚焦的设计原则,重构了教学流程,即课前通过职场场景驱动与机器即时初评,扫清语言表层障碍;课中基于数据分析进行精准促成,并通过同伴互评与教师高阶指导提升文章深度;课后实施包含机器、同伴及教师的多元评价与档案反思。同时,针对技术伦理风险,本模式建立了全过程监控与分层指导机制。本教学模式有助于实现机器纠错与教师育人的优势互补,能在一定程度上缓解写作教学费时低效的困境,对提升应用型人才的英语应用能力与职业素养具有一定的实践意义。
Abstract: To address persistent challenges in English writing instruction at application-oriented universities—such as an imbalanced teacher-student ratio, delayed feedback, and the disconnect between learning and use—this study explores a new pathway for pedagogical reform empowered by intelligent technology. Grounded in Wen Qiufang’s Production-Oriented Approach (POA) and supported by the iWrite English writing instruction and assessment platform, particularly its intelligent diagnostic tools and AIGC functions, the study constructs a blended, human-machine collaborative teaching model that integrates online and offline learning. The model follows the principles of human-machine complementarity and process-focused design and restructures instruction into three stages: before class, workplace scenarios are used to drive production and immediate automated pre-assessment helps remove surface-level linguistic barriers; in class, data-informed enabling is conducted to provide targeted scaffolding, and peer review together with teachers’ higher-order guidance is employed to deepen students’ writing; after class, a multidimensional evaluation system integrating machine-, peer-, and teacher-generated feedback is implemented, accompanied by learning-archive reflection. Meanwhile, to mitigate potential ethical risks associated with AIGC, the model establishes a whole-process monitoring mechanism and stratified guidance strategies. Overall, this model helps integrate the strengths of automated error correction and teacher-led educational guidance, and to some extent alleviates the time-consuming and low-efficiency dilemma in writing instruction, offering practical value for enhancing application-oriented students’ English communicative competence and professional literacy.
文章引用:刘文斌, 龚琪峰. 基于iWrite平台的应用型高校英语智能写作教学模式建构研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(3): 307-314. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.163486

参考文献

[1] 杨连瑞. ChatGPT大语言模型背景下的二语习得[J]. 现代外语, 2024, 47(4): 578-585.
[2] 孙成志, 刘文宇. 人工智能赋能外语教学的应用与未来展望[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2025(5): 77-87, 147.
[3] 于捷. 高校英语线上线下混合式教学模式[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2023, 45(S2): 258-260.
[4] 文秋芳. 构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015, 47(4): 547-558, 640.
[5] 许川根. 基于生成式人工智能的外语学习者人机协同写作投入研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2025(2): 61-73, 147.
[6] 刘应亮, 刘胜蓝, 杨进才. 社会文化活动理论视域下人机协同教学及应用探索——以iWrite协同英语写作教学为例[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(11): 108-116.
[7] Qian, L., Zhao, Y. and Cheng, Y. (2020) Evaluating China’s Automated Essay Scoring System iWrite. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58, 771-790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 魏爽, 李璐遥. 人工智能辅助二语写作反馈研究——以ChatGPT为例[J]. 中国外语, 2023, 20(3): 33-40.
[9] Tan, X., Wang, C. and Xu, W. (2025) To Disclose or Not to Disclose: Exploring the Risk of Being Transparent about GenAI Use in Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 张聪, 孟怡雯. 英语学习者对教师与GenAI写作反馈的投入差异研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2025(6): 52-64, 146.
[11] 陈茉, 吕明臣. ChatGPT环境下的大学英语写作教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2024(1): 161-168.
[12] 任伟, 刘远博, 解月. 英语写作教学中ChatGPT与教师反馈的对比研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2024(4): 30-38, 60.