多维度协同护理对ICU脑出血患者肺部感染 预防及整体预后的影响
The Impact of Multidimensional Collaborative Care on the Prevention of Pulmonary Infection and Overall Prognosis in ICU Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage
摘要: 目的:构建并验证一套多维度协同护理方案在预防重症监护室(ICU)脑出血患者肺部感染及改善其整体预后中的综合效果。方法:采用前瞻性研究方法,选取2023年1月至2024年4月我院ICU收治的64例脑出血患者,随机分为对照组与观察组,各32例。对照组实施常规护理,观察组实施整合了风险评估、结构化集束干预、系统质量控制及早期康复促进的多维度协同护理方案。比较两组患者肺部感染发生率、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间,并采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、日常生活活动能力量表(ADL)及简明健康状况调查表(SF-36)评估患者神经功能、日常生活能力及生活质量。结果:干预后,观察组患者肺部感染发生率(0% vs. 15.63%)及总并发症发生率(6.25% vs. 34.38%)均显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组机械通气时间[(7.30 ± 1.25) d vs. (15.10 ± 1.18) d]及ICU住院时间[(16.23 ± 1.25) d vs. (23.10 ± 3.09) d]均显著短于对照组(P < 0.05)。同时,观察组NIHSS评分显著低于对照组,ADL及SF-36各维度评分均显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:多维度协同护理方案能够通过系统性的风险管控与结构化干预,有效构建肺部感染防线,显著降低感染风险,并协同促进神经功能与生活质量的全面改善,临床价值显著。
Abstract: Objective: To construct and validate the comprehensive effect of a multidimensional collaborative care program in preventing pulmonary infection and improving overall prognosis in patients with cerebral hemorrhage in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A prospective study was conducted, selecting 64 patients with cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital’s ICU from January 2023 to April 2024. These patients were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 32 cases in each group. The control group received conventional care, while the observation group underwent a multidimensional collaborative care program that integrated risk assessment, structured bundle interventions, systematic quality control, and early rehabilitation promotion. The incidence of pulmonary infection, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) were used to assess patients’ neurological function, activities of daily living, and quality of life. Results: After intervention, the incidence of pulmonary infection (0% vs. 15.63%) and total complication rate (6.25% vs. 34.38%) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The duration of mechanical ventilation [(7.30 ± 1.25) days vs. (15.10 ± 1.18) days] and ICU length of stay [(16.23 ± 1.25) days vs. (23.10 ± 3.09) days] in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Simultaneously, the NIHSS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, while the scores for each dimension of ADL and SF-36 were significantly higher, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The multidimensional collaborative care program can effectively establish a defense line against pulmonary infection through systematic risk management and structured interventions, significantly reducing the risk of infection and synergistically promoting comprehensive improvements in neurological function and quality of life, demonstrating significant clinical value.
文章引用:姚泽冲, 钟文珠, 黄健仪, 何雁洪. 多维度协同护理对ICU脑出血患者肺部感染 预防及整体预后的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 697-705. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.163838

参考文献

[1] 辛丛华, 孙凌峰. 脑出血患者术后并发肺部重症感染的相关影响因素分析[J]. 反射疗法与康复医学, 2024, 5(21): 92-95.
[2] 张兴玲, 黄琳瑜, 张杰, 等. 高血压脑出血患者术后合并肺部感染危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2024, 45(6): 109-115.
[3] 胡卓雅. 老年高血压脑出血患者院内肺部感染的危险因素[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2025, 23(27): 7-9.
[4] 齐佳瑞, 张雯, 刘芳芳. 高血压脑出血术后肺部感染的危险因素Meta分析[J]. 中国科技论文在线精品论文, 2024, 17(3): 68-73.
[5] 徐林聪. 高血压脑出血术后并发肺部感染的危险因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 新乡: 新乡医学院, 2017.
[6] 刘艳丽, 孟淑艳, 张绍佳. 脑出血合并肺部感染患者病原感染特征及危险因素调查[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2025, 20(9): 90-93, 98.
[7] 肖芸, 敖红丽. 某院急性脑出血患者继发肺部感染的病原菌分布与耐药性分析[J]. 抗感染药学, 2024, 21(9): 90-93.
[8] 梁芹, 熊丹丹, 刘冬莲. 重症监护室脑出血预防肺部感染实施护理干预的效果研究[J]. 中国医药指南, 2022, 20(31): 140-142.
[9] 张小蕾, 刘宁宁. 基于规范路径的集束化护理对机械通气脑出血手术患者术后康复情况及肺部感染的影响研究[J]. 新疆中医药, 2025, 43(1): 85-88.
[10] 刘娟. 新型规范路径集束化护理干预策略对脑出血后气管切开患者肺部感染发生率的影响[J]. 慢性病学杂志, 2021, 22(7): 55-57.
[11] 崔丹丹, 钱坤, 方晶晶. 探讨预见性护理模式在重症监护室脑出血患者中的应用效果及对降低肺部感染发生率的影响[J]. 中外医疗, 2024, 43(35): 159-162, 176.
[12] 董艳茹. PDCA循环联合精细化管理在脑出血患者防误吸中的有效性观察[J]. 黑龙江中医药, 2024, 53(6): 158-160.
[13] 舒红仙, 刘艳, 李鹏英. 失效模式与效应分析模式预防脑出血患者呼吸机相关肺炎的应用分析[J]. 包头医学, 2025, 49(2): 117-120.
[14] 刘必成, 刘惠芳, 黄子祥, 等. 基于“信息-动机-行为技巧”的干预模式对老年脑梗死患者FMA评分、Barthel指数、自我护理能力的影响分析[J]. 延边大学医学学报, 2025, 48(12): 156-188.
[15] 侯自明, 刘东远, 杨俊. 等. 高流量湿化氧疗联合气管切开在老年脑出血病人中的应用效果及肺部感染的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(7): 31-36.
[16] 李晨红, 姜晨黎, 王金慧, 等. 脑出血患者微创颅内血肿清除术后肺部感染的影响因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(5): 58-64.
[17] 景珊, 商临萍. 呼吸机相关性肺炎集束化护理策略及优化[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(63): 55-56.
[18] 吴娱. 老年高血压脑出血术后肺部感染患者集束化护理的临床效果[J]. 现代养生, 2023, 23(3): 44-46.
[19] 杨娟, 王永华, 蒋玲俐. 脑出血患者肺部感染风险预测模型的研究进展[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(24): 149-153.
[20] 廖明兴. 重症脑出血患者ICU内肺部感染原因分析[J]. 医药前沿, 2024, 14(18): 121-123.