多元协同治理视角下的社区治理:在地实践及优化路径——以云南省W社工站为例
Community Governance under the Framework of Multi-Party Collaborative Governance: Local Practices and Optimization Paths—A Case Study of the W Social Work Station in Yunnan Province
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.153207, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 吴依莉:广西科技大学人文艺术与设计学院,广西 柳州;张发钦:广西科技大学马克思主义学院,广西 柳州
关键词: 多元主体协同治理社区治理乡镇社工站治理共同体Multilateral Collaborative Governance Community Governance Township Social Work Stations Governance Community
摘要: 当前,我国基层社区治理在推进国家治理体系与治理能力现代化背景下面临多重挑战,尤其民族地区因文化多元等因素,治理复杂性凸显。多元主体协同治理理论强调多元主体通过合作、协商实现共利益,为社区治理提供重要理论支撑。本文以云南省W社工站为例,运用文献研究法、实地调查法,从多元主体协同治理视角出发,分析乡镇社工站参与社区治理的内容、困境,最终提出深化协同合作、强化联动合作、完善赋能合作的优化路径。本文为民族地区社区治理现代化提供理论参考与实践借鉴。
Abstract: At present, the community governance at the grassroots level in China is confronted with multiple challenges under the background of promoting the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. Particularly in ethnic minority areas, the complexity of governance is highlighted due to factors such as cultural diversity. The theory of multi-subject collaborative governance emphasizes that multiple subjects achieve common interests through cooperation and consultation, providing an important theoretical support for community governance. Taking the W Social Work Station in Yunnan Province as an example, this paper uses the methods of literature research and field investigation, and from the perspective of multi-subject collaborative governance, analyzes the content and difficulties of the participation of township social work stations in community governance, and ultimately proposes optimization paths such as deepening collaborative cooperation, strengthening linkage cooperation, and improving empowerment cooperation. This paper provides theoretical references and practical references for the modernization of community governance in ethnic minority areas.
文章引用:吴依莉, 张发钦. 多元协同治理视角下的社区治理:在地实践及优化路径——以云南省W社工站为例[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(3): 128-137. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.153207

参考文献

[1] 陈寒非. 中国乡村治理法治化的实践路径研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2023: 308.
[2] 中共中央 国务院关于加强和完善城乡社区治理的意见[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-06/12/content_5201910.htm, 2017-06-12.
[3] 王红艳. 社会治理共同体理念的理论内涵与原创性贡献[N]. 人民日报, 2025-07-08(009).
[4] 梁利华. 治理共同体的生成: 多民族互嵌式社区的治理创新研究[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 43(6): 111-120.
[5] 龚今慧. 乡镇(街道)社会工作服务站建设发展的专业优势研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2021.
[6] 杨明伟, 卢妹玫. 社区治理理论指导下乡镇(街道)社工站的建设路径[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2023, 14(11): 152-155.
[7] 王强. 社区治理平台的实践困境研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2023.
[8] 刘舒. 乡村振兴背景下社区社会组织培育的困境与对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 保定: 河北大学, 2023.
[9] 陈雅沁. 社会工作参与农村社区协同治理的实践研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2022.
[10] 卢雪. 发展性社会工作视角下街道社工站建设路径探索[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西宁: 青海师范大学, 2023.
[11] 赫尔曼·哈肯. 协同学: 大自然构成的奥秘[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2005.
[12] 熊光清. 多中心协同治理何以重要[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(5): 11-18.
[13] 费孝通. 中华民族的多元一体格局[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1989(4): 3-21.
[14] 黄登良, 彭芳, 罗贤宇. 协同治理视角下森林"四库"联动的基本逻辑、现实挑战与路径选择[J/OL]. 世界林业研究: 1-8.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2080.S.20251219.1640.003, 2025-12-26.
[15] 罗西瑙. 没有政府的治理[M]. 张胜军, 刘小林, 等, 译. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 2001: 4-5.
[16] 格里∙斯托克, 华夏风. 作为理论的治理: 五个论点[J]. 国际社会科学杂志(中文版), 1999(1): 19-30.
[17] 风笑天. 社会学研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2001.
[18] 风笑天. 社会研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2022: 293.
[19] Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2007) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Provan, K.G. and Kenis, P. (2007) Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W.D. (2005) Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Agranoff, R. (2007) Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations. Georgetown University Press.
[23] Fung, A. (2015) Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, 75, 513-522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kania, J. and Kramer, M. (2011) Impacto Colectivo. Revista de Innovación Social de Stanford, 9, 36-41.