网络虚拟财产的继承问题探析
An Analysis of the Inheritance of Online Virtual Property
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2026.123078, PDF,   
作者: 王 语:西南民族大学法学院,四川 成都
关键词: 网络虚拟财产继承Online Virtual Property Inheritance
摘要: 互联网技术拉近虚拟财产与日常生活的距离,网络用户老龄化使得虚拟财产继承日益成为人们的关注焦点。我国《民法典》将网络虚拟财产确立为民法保护对象,但虚拟财产保护和继承的具体规则处于缺失状态,使得实践中具体案件缺少法律遵循。本文系统分析网络虚拟财产继承存在的问题:规范缺失使得继承主体、客体和程序不明确;网络服务协议对继承权利进行限制和排除,并有针对性的提出合理建议。本文认为,虚拟财产具有继承必要性,立法须回应社会需要,通过具体规则明确继承主体、客体和程序。根据服务商提请注意义务等的履行情况和公平原则确定网络服务协议的内容和条款效力,以规范不当限制用户权利的网络服务协议。
Abstract: Internet technology has shortened the distance between virtual property and daily life, and the aging of Internet users has made the inheritance of virtual property increasingly the focus of people’s attention. Chinese “Civil Code” establishes online virtual property as the object of civil law protection, but the specific rules of virtual property protection and inheritance are in a state of lack, which makes specific cases lack legal compliance in practice. This paper systematically analyzes the issues surrounding the inheritance of online virtual property: the lack of norms makes the subject, object and procedure of inheritance unclear; the network service agreement restricts and excludes inheritance rights, and reasonable suggestions are made in a targeted manner. This paper believes that virtual property has the necessity of inheritance, and legislation must respond to social needs, and specify the subject, object and procedure of inheritance through specific rules. According to the performance of the service provider’s duty of attention and the principle of fairness, the content and terms of the network service agreement are determined to regulate the network service agreement that improperly restricts the rights of users.
文章引用:王语. 网络虚拟财产的继承问题探析[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(3): 46-56. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.123078

参考文献

[1] 戴昱. 论数字遗产继承的相关法律问题[J]. 法律适用, 2012(5): 87-90.
[2] 梅夏英. 《民法典》对信息数据的保护及其解读[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 43(6): 26-31.
[3] 杨勤法, 季洁. 数字遗产的法秩序反思——以通信、社交账户的继承为视角[J]. 科技与法律, 2019(2): 74-80.
[4] 梅夏英, 许可. 虚拟财产继承的理论与立法问题[J]. 法学家, 2013(6): 81-92.
[5] 姜淑明, 彭利民. 我国数字遗产继承的具体路径研究[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 35(3): 67-74.
[6] 王琦. 网络时代的数字遗产∙通信秘密∙人格权——以社交、通信网络账户的继承为焦点[J]. 财经法学, 2018(6): 84-101.
[7] 张融. 关涉隐私利益的网络虚拟财产继承问题探讨[J]. 科学与社会, 2018, 8(2): 59-73.
[8] 陈奇伟, 刘伊纳. 数字遗产分类定性与继承研究[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015, 46(5): 78-84.
[9] 程啸. 论死者个人信息的保护[J]. 法学评论, 2021, 39(5): 13-23.
[10] 张挺. 一身专属性理论视角下的数字遗产继承[J]. 法学, 2023(2): 120-134.
[11] 黄忠. 隐私是阻碍网络虚拟财产继承的理由吗[J]. 财经法学, 2019(4): 50-63.
[12] 李岩. 虚拟财产继承立法问题[J]. 法学, 2013(3): 81-91.
[13] 马一德. 网络虚拟财产继承问题探析[J]. 法商研究, 2013(5): 75-83.