及物性视角下自闭症主题英文绘本的行为表征与认知建构——以My Brother CharlieThe Girl Who Thought in Pictures的对比为例
Behavioral Representation and Cognitive Construction of Autism in English Picture Books from the Transitivity Perspective—A Comparative Study of My Brother Charlie and The Girl Who Thought in Pictures
摘要: 文章基于系统功能语言学的及物性理论(Transitivity),对两部关于自闭症主题的英文绘本My Brother Charlie (MBC)和The Girl Who Thought in Pictures (GWTP)进行了对比分析。研究采用混合研究方法,建立了“行为”与“认知”两个子语料库,统计了不同过程类型(Process Types)的分布。研究发现,MBC主要通过物质过程描绘自闭症儿童的外部行为,并借助关系过程和心理过程将其融入家庭互动中,体现“关系理解型”逻辑;而GWTP则侧重于通过心理过程和隐喻性的关系过程,将自闭症的认知特征建构为独特优势,体现“天赋赋能型”逻辑。文章旨在揭示绘本如何通过语言机制构建自闭症的意义,并为相关绘本的创作与教育应用提供参考。
Abstract: Based on the transitivity theory of Systemic Functional Linguistics, this article conducts a comparative analysis of two English picture books on autism—My Brother Charlie (MBC) and The Girl Who Thought in Pictures (GWTP). Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study establishes two sub-corpora focusing on “behavior” and “cognition,” respectively, and examines the distribution of different process types. Findings indicate that MBC primarily depicts the external behaviors of autistic children through material processes, integrating their inner worlds into family interactions through relational processes and mental processes, reflecting a “relationship-understanding” logic. In contrast, GWTP focuses on using mental processes and metaphorical relational processes to construct autism cognition as a distinctive strength, embodying a “talent-empowering” logic. The study aims to uncover how these picture books construct the meaning of autism through linguistic mechanisms and provide insights for the creation and educational application of related picture books.
文章引用:徐佳欣. 及物性视角下自闭症主题英文绘本的行为表征与认知建构——以My Brother CharlieThe Girl Who Thought in Pictures的对比为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(3): 181-188. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.143211

参考文献

[1] 陈顺森, 白学军, 张日昇. 自闭症谱系障碍的症状、诊断与干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(1): 60-72.
[2] 蔡蓓瑛, 孔克勤. 自闭症儿童行为评定与社会认知发展的研究[J]. 心理科学, 2000(3): 269-274, 380.
[3] 苏佳佳, 叶浩生. 神经多样性视域下的自闭症谱系障碍[J]. 心理学探新, 2025, 45(5): 404-410.
[4] 余晖. 神经多样性视角下的“天赋”问题再审视[J]. 南京社会科学, 2025(9): 114-124.
[5] Royce, T.D. (2006) Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In: Royce, T.D. and Bowcher, W.L., Eds., New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, Lawrence Erlbaum, 81-95.
[6] 韩俊丽. 浅谈自闭症儿童绘本教学的有效策略[J]. 教育现代化, 2020, 7(22): 74-76.
[7] 王涵新. 系统功能视角下儿童绘本中家庭关系的多模态分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2023.
[8] 王蔷, 敖娜仁图雅. 中小学英语绘本教学的途径与方法[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2017, 37(4): 68-73.
[9] 熊淑萍, 李文炜, 王坚. 自闭症儿童康复路径国内外研究现状[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1902-1908.
[10] (2025) M.A.K. Halliday 100th Anniversary Memorial Symposia. WORD, 71, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 黄国文, 张珍真. 韩礼德与系统功能语言学——写在韩礼德诞辰100周年之际[J]. 中国外语, 2025, 22(4): 105-112.
[12] 陈一龙. 韩礼德系统功能语言学三分范式识解[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 47(6): 188-192.
[13] Davies, C.E. (2007) M.A.K. Halliday, Revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Functions of Language, 14, 303-315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 胡壮麟. 系统功能语言学的认知观[J]. 外语学刊, 2014(3): 44-50.
[15] 张韧. 及物系统的及物性及其话语功能[J]. 四川外语学院学报, 1992(1): 64-68.
[16] 李曙光, 郝颖. 论斯金纳行为主义与乔姆斯基心智主义范式的冲突与互补——基于自闭症儿童语言干预效用的考量[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2015(5): 111-120.
[17] 胡壮麟. 后韩礼德时代功能语言学的发展趋势[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021(1): 44-53, 2.