亲密伴侣暴力中的忍耐：性别、情景与未来结果考虑的影响
Tolerance in Intimate Partner Violence: The Influence of Gender, Scenario, and Consideration of Future Consequences
摘要: 本研究采用实验情景法，考察了观察者性别、受害者性别、暴力类型、生育情况以及性别角色态度与未来结果考虑对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)情景中忍耐的影响。对500名参与者的数据分析发现：1) 男性观察者、受害者性别为男性、暴力类型为精神暴力以及个体“考虑未来”倾向越高，其对IPV的忍耐水平也越高；2) 生育状况调节了“考虑当下”对忍耐的影响：仅在已生育情境下，高考虑当下的个体忍耐水平更低；3) 各变量对忍耐的影响主要表现为独立主效应。研究结果从性别社会化与认知动机双视角，揭示了公众对IPV容忍态度的心理机制，特别指出现实中针对男性受害者和精神暴力的容忍度更高，为开展有针对性的反暴力公众教育提供了实证依据。
Abstract: This study employed an experimental vignette methodology to examine the effects of observer gender, victim gender, type of violence, parental status, gender role attitudes, and consideration of future consequences (CFC) on tolerance toward intimate partner violence (IPV). The analysis of data from 500 participants revealed that: 1) male observers, male victims, psychological violence (vs. physical violence), and a stronger “consideration of future consequences” were each associated with higher levels of IPV tolerance; 2) parental status moderated the effect of “consideration of immediate consequences” (CIC) on tolerance—specifically, higher CIC predicted lower tolerance only among participants with children; and 3) the effects of these predictors were primarily manifested as independent main effects. Interpreted through the dual lenses of gender socialization and cognitive motivation, these findings shed light on the psychological mechanisms underlying public tolerance of IPV. They particularly underscore the heightened tolerance observed toward male victims and psychological violence in real-world contexts, providing empirical evidence to inform targeted public education campaigns against violence.
文章引用：唐蔓 (2026). 亲密伴侣暴力中的忍耐：性别、情景与未来结果考虑的影响. 心理学进展, 16(3), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.163126

参考文献

[1] 冯嘉溪, 王毅辰, 张登浩(2020). 未来结果考虑量表在我国成年人中的信效度检验. 心理研究, 13(6), 521-527.
[2] 刘斯漫, 刘柯廷, 李田田, 卢莉(2015). 大学生正念对主观幸福感的影响: 情绪调节及心理弹性的中介作用. 心理科学, 38(4), 889-895.
[3] 沙莲香(1989). 中国民族性(一). 中国人民大学出版社.
[4] 吴梦玲(2017). 中国双薪夫妇的平等性别角色态度与婚姻质量的关系. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[5] 张玮, 洪炜, 崔轶, 苏英(2014). 亲密伴侣暴力中的性别差异研究. 中国性科学, (9), 96-99.
[6] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[7] Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications.
[8] Anderson, M. A., Gillig, P. M., Sitaker, M., McCloskey, K., Malloy, K., & Grigsby, N. (2003). “Why Doesn’t She Just Leave?”: A Descriptive Study of Victim Reported Impediments to Her Safety. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 151-155.[CrossRef] 
[9] Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 57, 289-300.[CrossRef] 
[10] Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital Conflict and Child Adjustment: An Emotional Security Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387-411.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against Wives: A Case against the Patriarchy. Free Press.
[12] Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). The Relation between Gender and Emotion in Different Cultures. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and Emotion (pp. 71-94). Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[13] Follingstad, D. R., DeHart, D. D., & Green, E. P. (2004). Psychologists’ Judgments of Psychologically Aggressive Actions When Perpetrated by a Husband versus a Wife. Violence and Victims, 19, 435-452.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. Anchor Books.
[15] Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2006). Acceptability of Domestic Violence against Women in the European Union: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 123-129.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
[17] Ho, M. Y., Liang, S., & Hook, J. N. (2023). Development and Validation of the Forbearance Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105, 779-788.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2, 1-26.[CrossRef] 
[19] Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[20] Johnson, I. M. (1992). Economic, Situational, and Psychological Correlates of the Decision-Making Process of Battered Women. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 73, 168-176.[CrossRef] 
[21] Moore, M., & Dahlen, E. R. (2008). Forgiveness and Consideration of Future Consequences in Aggressive Driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1661-1666.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Nomaguchi, K., & Milkie, M. A. (2020). Parenthood and Well-Being: A Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82, 198-223.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Peters, J. (2008). Measuring Myths about Domestic Violence: Development and Initial Validation of the Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16, 1-21.[CrossRef] 
[24] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and Satisfaction in Romantic Associations: A Test of the Investment Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.[CrossRef] 
[26] Seelau, E. P., Seelau, S. M., & Poorman, P. B. (2003). Gender and Role-Based Perceptions of Domestic Abuse: Does Sexual Orientation Matter? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 199-214.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Sorenson, S. B., & Thomas, K. A. (2009). Views of Intimate Partner Violence in Same-and Opposite-Sex Relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 337-352.[CrossRef] 
[28] Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The Consideration of Future Consequences: Weighing Immediate and Distant Outcomes of Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.[CrossRef] 
[29] Straus, M., Kantor, G., & Moore, D. (1997). Change in Cultural Norms Approving Marital Violence from 1968 to 1994. In G. Kaufman Kantor, & J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of the Darkness: Contemporary Perspectives on Family Violence (pp. 3-16). SAGE Publications, Inc.[CrossRef] 
[30] Suzuki, A. (1994). Construction of a Short-Form of the Scale of Egalitarian Sex Role Attitudes (SESRA-S). The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 65, 34-41.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Tie, L., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Judgments and Attributions of Intimate Partner Violence in China: The Role of Directionality, Gender Stereotypicality, and Ambivalent Sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38, 10485-10513.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Westview Press.
[33] Tung, R., Reiter, M. A., Linke, A., Kohli, J. S., Kinnear, M. K., Müller, R. et al. (2021). Functional Connectivity within an Anxiety Network and Associations with Anxiety Symptom Severity in Middle-Aged Adults with and without Autism. Autism Research, 14, 2100-2112.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] WHO (2021). Violence against Women Prevalence Estimates, 2018. World Health Organization.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256
[35] Yamawaki, N., Ochoa-Shipp, M., Pulsipher, C., Harlos, A., & Swindler, S. (2012). Perceptions of Domestic Violence: The Effects of Domestic Violence Myths, Victim’s Relationship with her Abuser, and the Decision to Return to Her Abuser. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3195-3212.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Yang, T., Poon, A. W. C., & Breckenridge, J. (2019). Estimating the Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in China’s Mainland: Insights and Challenges. Journal of Family Violence, 34, 93-105.[CrossRef]