拼购模式下农产品供应链数字化赋能的机理解构与优化路径——以拼多多电商助农实践为例
Mechanism Deconstruction and Optimization Path of Digital Empowerment for Agricultural Supply Chains under Group-Buying Model—A Case Study of Pinduoduo’s E-Commerce Agricultural Assistance
摘要: 数字经济正在从底层逻辑上重塑农业生产与流通的既有范式,以拼多多为代表的社交电商模式如何突破传统农产品供应链产销脱节的结构性矛盾,已成为驱动产业可持续发展的关键命题。本研究立足于利益相关者与三重底线理论视域,构建了包含政府引导、平台运营与社会反馈三维度的结构方程模型。研究采用线上滚雪球抽样法,面向全国范围内深度参与“多多农园”及“百亿补贴”项目的农户与商家获取204份有效数据,利用SPSS与AMOS软件进行信效度检验与路径分析。实证结果显示,政府支持、平台运营与社会绩效之间已形成显著的正向协同效应,政府政策引导与社会公众诉求是启动供应链转型的核心驱动力,且拼多多“拼购 + 产地直发”模式带来的运营绩效提升能够显著促进社会与环境绩效的改善(β = 0.787),验证了数字化技术在实现“经济效益与社会责任双赢”方面的有效性。因子分析进一步揭示,当前制约供应链韧性的核心瓶颈在于冷链履约成本高,企业、复合型数智人才匮乏以及绿色信任机制的缺位。未来的助农模式需从单纯的技术叠加转向系统性的生态重构,通过打造“云–网–端”一体化数智基建、建立产教融合的利益联结机制以及完善绿色数据治理体系,实现经济价值与社会生态价值的动态平衡。
Abstract: The digital economy is profoundly reshaping the underlying logic of agricultural production and circulation. A critical proposition for driving sustainable industrial development is determining how the social e-commerce model, represented by Pinduoduo, breaks through the structural contradiction of the disconnect between production and marketing in traditional agricultural supply chains. Methodology: Grounded in Stakeholder Theory and the Triple Bottom Line framework, this study constructs a three-dimensional structural equation model (SEM) encompassing government guidance, platform operation, and social feedback. Utilizing an online snowball sampling method, the study obtained 204 valid responses from farmers and merchants deeply involved in Pinduoduo’s “Duo Duo Farm” and “10 Billion Subsidy” projects nationwide. Reliability and validity testing, along with path analysis, were conducted using SPSS and AMOS software. Results: Empirical results demonstrate a significant positive synergistic effect among government support, platform operation, and social performance. Government policy guidance and social public demand serve as the core driving forces initiating supply chain transformation. Notably, the operational performance enhancement driven by Pinduoduo’s “Group-Buying + Origin-Direct” model significantly promotes social and environmental performance (β = 0.787), validating the efficacy of digital technology in achieving a “win-win” for economic benefits and social responsibility. Conclusion: Factor analysis further reveals that high cold-chain fulfillment costs, a shortage of interdisciplinary digital talents, and the absence of a green trust mechanism are the primary bottlenecks restricting supply chain resilience. Future agricultural assistance models must shift from mere technological addition to systemic ecological reconstruction. This involves building an integrated “Cloud-Net-End” digital infrastructure, establishing an industry-education integration mechanism for interest linkage, and perfecting the green data governance system to achieve a dynamic balance between economic value and socio-ecological value.
文章引用:高施宇. 拼购模式下农产品供应链数字化赋能的机理解构与优化路径——以拼多多电商助农实践为例[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(3): 487-494. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.153298

参考文献

[1] 吕成成, 种道清, 刘向东. 农产品供应链组织模式的创新研究[J]. 生产力研究, 2021(12): 56-61.
[2] 李正军, 赵凤, 宾厚. “互联网+”农产品供应链模式优化研究[J]. 吉林工商学院学报, 2019, 35(1): 37-41.
[3] 隋博文, 庄丽娟. 跨境农产品供应链的形成机制、类型特点及整合策略——基于广西-东盟的实践[J]. 对外经贸实务, 2015(6): 50-53.
[4] Jeurissen, R. (2000) John Elkington, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 229-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 贾生华, 陈宏辉. 利益相关者的界定方法述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2002, 24(5): 13-18.
[6] Krajaysri, W. (2010) Effective Supply Chain Management Strategy for Food Products: An Insight to Linked Partnerships. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 1, 62-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 周礼南, 周根贵, 綦方中, 等. 考虑消费者有机产品偏好的生鲜农产品供应链均衡研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(2): 360-371.
[8] 李斌, 林庆欢, 施志权, 等. 宁波破解“菜贱伤农”的做法与建议[J]. 新农村, 2024(5): 10-11.
[9] 冯小龙, 刘永华. 基地直供生鲜农产品供应链遇到的问题与对策[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2023, 36(1): 85-90.
[10] 曾亿武, 马长江, 李丽莉, 等. 直播电商与农产品上行价值重构: 机理与实现路径[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(2): 108-117.
[11] 刘耀东. 供应链的可持续性发展不是“伪命题” [J]. 中国商人, 2023(9): 62-63.
[12] 肖红军, 阳镇. 可持续性商业模式创新: 研究回顾与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(9): 3-18.