基于雨型分类的山洪小流域洪水预报研究
Research on Flood Forecasting in Small Mountainous Watersheds Based on Rainfall Patterns
DOI: 10.12677/jwrr.2026.151001, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 蔡亦婷, 黎小东, 余 媛:四川大学水利水电学院,四川 成都;覃光华*:四川大学水利水电学院,四川 成都;四川大学山区河流保护与治理全国重点实验室,四川 成都
关键词: 山洪小流域降雨雨型时间分布特征洪水预报新安江模型Small Mountainous Watershed Rainfall Pattern Temporal Distribution Characteristics Flood Forecasting Xin’anjiang Model
摘要: 洪水的形成受到多重因素共同作用,其中降雨作为主要驱动因子,其时间分布特征对洪水过程具有重要影响。对降雨进行雨型分类,并针对不同雨型进行差异化的预报,是提高水文模型预测精度的一种可行且有效的技术路径。本文以四川省山洪小流域清溪河为研究对象,引入无量纲曲线刻画降雨事件的时间分布,基于聚类分析对流域的不同降雨类型进行辨识,并进一步研究了降雨的时间分布特征对洪水响应及水文模型模拟能力的影响。结果表明,清溪河流域的主要降雨类型有三种,其中时程分布相对均匀的雨型最为常见。不同雨型在洪水响应方面表现出显著差异:降雨集中且峰值出现较早的雨型更易诱发单峰洪水,而分布均匀的雨型则倾向于形成多峰洪水。基于新安江模型对三类雨型对应的洪水过程进行模拟,所得平均纳什效率系数分别为0.75、0.77和0.81,表明模型对降雨过程均匀的雨型模拟效果最佳,而对短时强降雨类型的模拟精度相对较低。本研究揭示了流域降雨时间分布对洪水形成的影响规律,可为山洪小流域的洪水预报提供技术参考。
Abstract: The formation of floods is influenced by multiple factors, among which rainfall events, as the primary driving force, play a decisive role, with their temporal distribution being a particularly critical factor. Classifying rainfall into different patterns and adopting differentiated forecasting strategies is a feasible and effective approach to improving the accuracy of hydrological model predictions. This study took the Qingxi River Basin, a small mountainous watershed in Sichuan Province, as the research area. Dimensionless mass curves were introduced to characterize the temporal distribution of rainfall events, and cluster analysis was employed to identify different rainfall types within the basin. Furthermore, the impacts of rainfall temporal distribution on flood response and hydrological model performance were investigated. The results indicate that three main rainfall types are identified in the Qingxi River Basin, among which the relatively uniform temporal distribution is the most common. Significant differences are observed in flood responses under different rainfall types: rainfall with concentrated distribution and earlier peak occurrence tends to generate single-peak floods, while uniformly distributed rainfall is more likely to result in multi-peak floods. Flood simulations of the three rainfall types using the Xin’anjiang Model yield average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients of 0.75, 0.77, and 0.81, respectively, suggesting that simulations perform best for uniformly distributed rainfall, but less accurately for short-duration and high-intensity rainfall events. This study reveals the crucial role of the temporal distribution of rainfall in shaping flood processes and provides valuable technical references for flood forecasting in small mountainous watersheds.
文章引用:蔡亦婷, 覃光华, 黎小东, 余媛. 基于雨型分类的山洪小流域洪水预报研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2026, 15(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12677/jwrr.2026.151001

参考文献

[1] 国家防汛抗旱总指挥部, 中华人民共和国水利水利部水文局. 中国水旱灾害公报2022 [M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2022.
[2] KEIFER, G. J., CHU, H. H. Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design. Journal of the Hydraulics Division ASCE, 1957, 83(4): 1-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] HUFF, F. A. Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms. Water Resource Research, 1967, 3(4): 1007-1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] YEN, B. C., CHOW, V. T. Design hyetographs for small drainage structures. Journal of the Hydraulies Division ASCE, 1980, 106(6): 1055-1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] LI, J., DENG, C., LI, H., et al. Hydrological environmental responses of LID and approach for rainfall pattern selection in precipitation data-lacked region. Water Resources Management, 2018, 32: 3271-3284.[CrossRef
[6] TANG, G. P., HUANG, J. S. and SHENG, D. C. Stability analysis of unsaturated soil slopes under random rainfall patterns. Engineering Geology, 2018, 245(1): 322-332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] OPPEL, H., FISCHER, S. A new unsupervised learning method to assess clusters of temporal distribution of rainfall and their coherence with flood types. Water Resources Research, 2020, 56(5): e2019WR026511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 毛北平, 张玉洁, 刘四海. 降雨时程分布对山洪灾害预警影响初步研究[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(24): 11-14.
[9] 沈天元, 马细霞, 张李川, 等. 基于不同雨型的裴河小流域山洪灾害临界雨量分析[J]. 水文, 2018, 38(6): 37-41.
[10] 高长松, 肖洋, 许栋, 等. 暴雨雨型对城市排水管网和地表洪涝过程的联合影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(4): 60-70.
[11] 梁峰铭, 谭超, 黄锋华, 等. 基于K-means聚类的降雨时空特征提取对水文模型预测结果的影响[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2026, 57(1): 192-204.
[12] 霍雨, 廖卫红, 刘岩, 等. 暴雨移植在密云水库洪水预报调度中的应用研究[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报(中英文), 2025, 23(6): 669-678+688.
[13] 付晓娣, 阚光远, 刘荣华, 等. 基于机器学习的雨型分类研究: 以淠河流域为例[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2024, 55(2): 101-111.
[14] 李致家, 黄鹏年, 姚成, 等. 灵活架构水文模型在不同产流区的应用[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(1): 28-35.
[15] HUANG, Y., BÁRDOSSY, A. and ZHANG, K. Sensitivity of hydrological models to temporal and spatial resolutions of rainfall data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2019, 23(6): 2647-2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef